Geometric morphometrics Flashcards

1
Q

What is morphometrics?

A

Quantitative analysis of form that encompass size and shape
* Analyses performed on live organisms, museum samples and fossils

  • Test hypotheses about factors that influence organismal shape using multivariate statistics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does morphometrics analyze

A
  • Used to analyse:
  • The impact of mutations on shape
  • Developmental changes in form
  • Covariance between ecological factors and shape - Quantitative-genetic parameters of shape
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Morphometrics replacement

A

Done for centuries as initial classifications relied on morphological differentiation
(taxonomy)

NOW:
- Allozymes & RFLPs - Sequencing
- Microsatellites
- AFLPs
- SNPs
- Gene expressions profiles etc…
* Today, relatedness and taxonomic status determined using genetic methods, where much of the work confirms relationships established using morphometrics
* Genetics now used to infer relationships that were once based purely based on morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Morphometrics’ new role

A
  • Species can adapt to local environments
  • Morphological traits fit/correlate with environmental gradients
  • Clarify important speciation mechanisms such as trophic adaptation, predator avoidance, sexual selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Traditional Morphometrics methods

A

based on Distances between features and structural Counts (meristic data)
* Not standardised and often lack of common units
* Measurements not always homologous introducing additional variation and ambiguity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Limits in traditional morphometric methods

A

the information is not independent and is redundant (overlapping areas of measurement)

Limited in power as the geometry among distances and localized shape changes not considered e.g. eye position relative to dorsal fin insertion

Difficult to interpret and visualise what distance and count differences mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Geometric Morphometrics

A

Landmark based technique used to determine:
- Overall differences in morphology (similar to traditional techniques)
- Both overall and specific differences in shape among specimens
* Powerful method that captures both traditional information but also takes the geometric relationship among features into account
* The geometry among landmarks (LM) is never lost from the analyses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Geometric Morphometrics landmarks

A
  • Landmarks (LM): Points of correspondence on each object that match between and
    within populations of specimens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Landmark repeatability

A

LMs found on specimens easily by someone else
can typically be solved by providing LM aids or having pictures with the
LMs used on a typical specimen

Articulated structures such as fins, jaws, legs, or claws often not in a standardised orientation and can introduce errors in shape analyses unless corrected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Landmark coverage

A

Do the LM cover the area of interest well?
* Compromises can be made to characterise important features among specimens at
the sacrifice of choosing only partially Homologous LMs

Number of shape variables generated is 2K-4, where K is the # LM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Landmark coplanarity

A

For some 2D images there is potential for distortion due to projection of features in the 3rd dimension
* Such LMs are typically avoided but can be incorporated if consistently oriented by the imaging system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Knowledge of studied taxa

A

Studied fish in nutrient poor system
* High diversity of similar looking fishes all identified by traditional taxonomy as different species
* Repeating assessments was unsuccessful at recovering the same species
* GM techniques found clear differences in body shape and feeding morphology in these fish adapted to oligotrophic system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bookstein landmark typology

A

Landmarks used in most analyses are based on Bookstein LM descriptions

TYPE I = Junction of tissues or centres of convex structures
TYPE II = Min & max curvatures and apex(es)
TYPE III = Extreme points away from features & transpositions
* Types I and II are generally preferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LM related to Geometric morphometrics

A

Once placed, all LMs together consist of a single LM configuration /specimen

LM configurations are NOT shape variable because they still include non-shape components
* Only when non-shape components are removed are LM configurations treated as shape variable because only shape information remains in configuration’s geometry
* Achieved by superimposition methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Superimposition

A

What To Do:
1- Start off in Configuration Space( just your landmarks,)
2- Pass through Pre-Shape Space
3- Shape Space achieved by Removing the effects of orientation by minimising distances between Landmark Configurations in Multi-Dimensional Pre-Shape Space
4- Now you are in Multi-Dimensional Shape Space! (2K-4 dimensions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

GLS – Procrustes superimposition steps

A
  1. Pick and position biologically homologous landmarks on specimens
  2. Repeat over all specimens
  3. All specimens are transposed to common position by their centroids and rescaled to unit size achieving Pre-shape space\
  4. In pre-shape space the effects of orientation are also removed by minimising the Procrustes Distance between individual LM configurations, which get’s us into multi-dimensional (2K-4) shape space
  5. GLS minimises Procrustes distances between all LM configurations using least squares generating overall average LM configuration termed the “Consensus Configuration”
17
Q

Thin-plate spline

A
  • Compares each individual specimen’s LM configuration to that of the consensus generated from the GLS
  • The LM changes are expressed in directions orthogonal to the plane of the LMs
    demonstrates how areas between LMs change in target LM configurations
18
Q

Thin-plate spline steps

A
  1. Consensus configuration represents ‘Least Squared Average’ body shape over all specimens
  2. Thin-plate spline generates smooth interpolation functions expressing landmark changes along “tangential orthogonal” shape axis called Principal Axes or Warps (in red)
  3. This calculates change along each Principal Warp (in pink) needed to fit each specimen’s landmarks onto those of the consensus configuration which generates Partial Warps
  4. Each specimen characterized by its own set of Partial Warps which can be used in standard multivariate analyses to discriminate among specimens and specimen groups
19
Q

Some bad components of shape variation

A

*Shearing and Stretching changes that impact shape (uniform components/ affine shape changes) – often related to image quality can be corrected
* More Localized changes in shape (non-uniform components/ non- affine shape change) – these are most informative