Genes and Behaviours Flashcards

1
Q

Moscovitch and Wincour (1997)

A

object agnosia

CK sustained a head injury

motor, cognitive and memory deficits

normal facial recognition, but couldn’t recognise objects

Archimbaldo effect

also, inverted faces were harder to recognise - upright faces recognised holistically, but inverted faces were recognised part-based

therefore recognition of inverted and upright faces are not recognised in the same way

controls - 71%
CK - 14%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Butterworth and Dingle (2004)

A

prosopagnosia

recognises objects but not faces

life long difficulties recognising faces

identity, emotion, and gender

controls - 21/25
Edward - 3/25

greebles - similar to faces. introduced to 20 greebles and names

Edward performed as well as controls on learning the greebles and names

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

NcNeil and Warrington

A

WJ had profound prosopagnosia after a stroke - acquired

could identify his sheep more readily than people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

is recognition normally distributed or dichotomous?

A

it is normally distributed. not either a super recogniser or no facial recognition

it is a continuum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Russell and Duchain

A

focus on recognition

Cambridge faces - before they were famous test

people normally dislike TV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Zhu et al (2010)

A

MZ and DZ twins

facial recognition ability (FRA)

heritability = 28%

face inversion effect = 34.8%

composite face effect - align Tony Blair and George Bush = 31%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DeRenzi

A

fusiform face area (FFA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anti social personality disorder

A

no one is born a psychopath - look at reasons how or why someone becomes a psychopath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Frick

A

early behavioural warning signs of children at risk of psychopathology - callous unemotional traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Frick and Viding

A

low callous unemotional traits - aggressive when under threat, feel bad when hurting others, high levels of anxiety. hostile attribution bias, oversensitivity to perceived anger, maybe experienced family violence, vigilant to potential threats

high callous unemotional traits - proactive aggressive, lack of guilt, not worrying about hurting others, low levels of anxiety. problems recognising fear and distress, less responsive to punishment, normally good TOM, more likely to sympathise with those who have been through similar experiences. may predispose children to antisocial behaviour

hard to look at in children, as to some extent all lack empathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

origins of antisocial behaviour

A

genetics (A), shared environment (C) and non shared environment (E)

high callous = 1/5 E, 4/5 A
low callous = 1/3 A, 1/3 C, 1/3 E

there are risk genes for having a low unemotional trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Viding

A

low amygdala activation in those with high callous unemotional traits when looking at a fear inducing task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sebastian

A

low amygdala activity in those with high callous unemotional traits when looking at faces of people in distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

antisocial behaviour causes

A

should look at both social and biological factors that affect the onset of unemotional traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Waltham Forest

A

boys 11.6%
girls 8.6%

left handers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

historical handedness

A

palaeolithic 77% left handed, 23% right handed - blowing hand shapes onto the stone walls

Toth - early human stone tools

maybe biological in that case

17
Q

animals and handedness

A

mice - equal 50:50

18
Q

Plato and Aristotle

A

nurture vs. nature

19
Q

Foetal Handedness

A

Hepper et al - preferential thumb sucking. there at birth … it is genetic

20
Q

handedness in families

A

McManus and Bryden - Mendelian genetic model - autosomal genes

actually was disproven

21
Q

twins and handedness

A

can end up with different handedness - but identical genetics

Manhatton plot

about 40 genes affecting handedness

therefore there is no gene for handedness

75.3% vs. 75.4% for MZ and DZ twins

22
Q

cerebral lateralisation

A

Broca - Lebourgne, aphasia,
fMRI shows that face and emotional processing is in the right hemisphere, but what the Brocas area does is really unclear

23
Q

how do we know where language is located?

A

dichotic listening
stroke/ brain damage etc
fMRi is expensive, and slow, and there are ethical problems

24
Q

Knecht et al (2000)

A

middle cerebral arteries blood flows through into frontal lobe

blood flow better in left hemisphere compared to the right hemisphere
some people process language in the right side of the brain

which is the dominant side of brain tends to be the opposite of what your handedness is

25
Q

myths about left handers

A

usually more mathematical and musical

not more likely to be president despite belief

more over represented at either side of scale

26
Q

1991 cohort study

A

careers - only make sense in retrospect. long lasting. sometimes up to 7 years

looking at going into nursing - need similar entry qualifications. easy to study

27
Q

John Holland (1919-2008)

A
Hollands occupational typology  (RIASEC)
Realist
Investigative
Artistic
Social
Enterprising
Conventional 

people fit into one type

psychologists are usually weary, but it is good as people can fit into one type

measure by having a 5 point scale, and why jobs people may want to do. multidimensional scaling map

28
Q

how are careers chosen

A

random

Gottfredson - map of careers, prestige level, reflects education, are able to map multidimensionally, or just 2

prestige level x sex type

have a tolerable level, endup with a zone of acceptable careers -

we do not decide what we do want to do, but decide what we do not want to do

29
Q

when do we start to think about careers?

A

Rice (2012) - from childhood.

meet kids in primary school and follow them through to secondary school

age 15/16 typically

lots of gender differences

says that the choice of vocation is an expression of personality

able to correlate the big 5 with RIASEC - although neuroticism is important, it is not directly correlated with RIASEC

30
Q

Ackerman

A

used Hollwnds hexagonal structure and found correlations between interest themes and measures of personality and intellectual ability

31
Q

sex and gender

A

biological sex
sex is biological
gender is the socio cultural concept

McManus looked at people who wanted to be a surgeon

vast range between men and women, but not to do with if you a re a male or a female, but how you see the world - i.e. little to do with sex, more to do with gender

people who go into surgery tend to be more masculine compared to females who go into surgery

32
Q

how can you tell how much people enjoy their career?

A

OCB people are nicer at work

if you are in the right job for your personality, there is better satisfaction at work