General (videos) Flashcards
BO currently use absorption costing. What must be considered when using ABC? Intro
We currently use absorption costing to allocate production overheads. ABC is more complex and will tend to require expenditure on computer equipment to enable the calcs to be carried out. Suitability may depend on whether the Modis pack production is carried out separately from the BPs currently produced. There are 5 criteria to assess to enable a useful judgement of suitability
What are the 5 criteria to assess suitability of ABC?
- Diverse range
- Small batches
- Different Methods
- Overhead cost proportion
- Complexity vs Volume
Explain what BO must consider when assessing the criteria of diverse range in ABC?
There are not a diverse range of BPs. There will be a small number of removeable packs. They are made using similar processess. ABC is more appropriate when the range is diverse.
Overhead costs are not significantly different from one BP to another. It is likely that each of the removeable packs will have a similar overhead cost
Explain what BO must consider when assessing the criteria of batch sizes in ABC?
Small batch sizes are appropriate for ABC. Batch production of BPs takes place. Within the 4 stages there is scope for activities where more than one part of a pack is produced. Sewing includes the cut fabric. the zippers and attaching the back section. Each activity can be identified. This enables the use of ABC
Explain what BO must consider when assessing the criteria of different methods in ABC?
The methods of production for the packs do not vary very much. Each pack will be produced using similar methods. The end results differ because of the different materials used. This does not support the view that ABC would be suitable
Explain what BO must consider when assessing the criteria of overhead production in ABC?
The overhead costs are low in proportion to total costs. For a BP they make up c.15% of the cost. The removable packs can be expected to be a similar proportion. Any additional equipment can be expected to add to overhead costs. The low overhead cost supports the view that ABC is not suitable
Explain what BO must consider when assessing the criteria of complexity vs volume in ABC?
When the overhead cost of a product is caused by the complexity of production, ABC is a better way to allocate the costs. When the no. of units produced is more significant, ABC is less beneficial. The labour proportion of the total cost of each BP reflects the labour time each requires. This does not support the use of ABC
The SMT is considering using ZBB for the development of new BPs. What are the ZBB process steps?
1.Identify activities
2. Decision packages
3. Mutually exclusive decision packages
4. Incremental decision packages
5. Ranked
The SMT is considering using ZBB for the development of new BPs. Explain the ‘identify activities’ step in ZBB
We would need to identify objects that generate cost. Each activity has an objective. The objective would be to design a BP which has the characteristics that are critical for customers
The SMT is considering using ZBB for the development of new BPs. Explain the ‘Decision packages’ step in ZBB
We would need to develop decision packages for alternative approaches for design. Each decision package would be an analysis and costing of different ways to achieve the objective
The SMT is considering using ZBB for the development of new BPs. Explain the ‘mutually exclusive decision packages’ step in ZBB
These involve either / or scenarios. We could have testing of prototypes using our own staff or give this role to a specialist research company. We would even ask known BPs users who have bought in the past
The SMT is considering using ZBB for the development of new BPs. Explain the ‘incremental decision packages’ step in ZBB
This can be developed for each option. The starting point would be testing by BO staff and asking for individual comments that represent the lowest cost. Then packages can be assed on such as arranging to meet the people concerned using a teams meeting or inviting them to a venue for a focus meeting in person
The SMT is considering using ZBB for the development of new BPs. Explain the ‘Ranked’ step in ZBB
The decision packages are analysed and costed. They are then reviewed and ranked on a cost benefit basis. The benefits of a person to person meeting would be the opp to develop a good rapport with people testing the BPs, The team could expand beyond a pre-planned set of questions. Relying on individuals comments will not generate discussion. Such info may not be useful
Discuss BOs variance analysis approach?
I suggest that BO uses standards that are subject to change more often than once a yr. Variance analysis using out of date standards is not good practice. Standards could be revised more often.
The price of RMs such as cotton fleece, could be volatile as they depend on nature
Why might more regular revisions of the standards be more suitable for BO?
Seasonal variations
Prices of materials –> inflation
Cost control
Implications - finance department - lumbered with extra work!
Judgement: does the greater accuracy of the control information produced outweigh the additional costs of the work required to review the standards?
Last week we completed the draft financial statements for june 24. We know that some BPs included in the inventory valuation were sub-standard. This would usually mean scrapping them. The SMT are considering selling the sub-standard BPs to a retailer specicialising in sub-standard goods. The retailer would buy at 50% of usual price, less a $5 per item handling fee. Explain how would be affected by IAS10.
IAS 10 splits events after the end of the reporting period into adjusting and non-adjusting events.
Adjusting events arise after the end of an accounting period that provide evidence of conditions existing at the end of the reporting period. The discovery that some BPs were sub-standard is an adjusting event.
These backpacks were included in the inventory at 30 June 24. We treated them as being saleable finished goods. The discovery of the faults shows this was incorrect. They should be included in the inventory at their NRV.
The financial statements have not yet been authorised and filed. We need to adjust the value of the inventory in respect of the sub-standard BPs. This will provide the correct carrying value of the inventory
Last week we completed the draft financial statements for june 24. We know that some BPs included in the inventory valuation were sub-standard. This would usually mean scrapping them. The SMT are considering selling the sub-standard BPs to a retailer specicialising in sub-standard goods. The retailer would buy at 50% of usual price, less a $5 per item handling fee. Explain how would be affected by IAS2.
IAS2 requires inventory to be valued in the financial statements at the lower of cost and NRV
The BPs have been included in the FS for the yr ended 30 June 24 at cost. This cost is the cost of all the costs incurred in bring them to their present location and condition. The NRV of the BPs is the estimated selling price less any estimated costs of completion and any costs to make the sale.
If the plan is to sell the sub-standard BPs through the retailer goes ahead, the NRV will be 50% of the normal retailer price less the handling fee per BP. If the SMT choose to scrap the sub-standard BPs the NRV will be 0.
The NRV of the faulty BPs is lower than cost. The inventory value in the FS should be written down to the NRV.
If the SMT decides to scrap them, it should be noted that any parts such as packaging that is salvaged and retained in inventory should be included in the FS at cost
What terms should be used for risk and uncertainty
Uncertainty - do not use the word risk
- Maximin - pessimistic
2.Maximax - Optimistic
3.Minimax regret - bad loser
Risk
1.Best outcome (irrespective of prop) = Risk seeker
2.Highest EV (ignores SD and coefficient) = Risk neutral
3. Lowest risk (the lowest coefficient of variation)= Risk adverse
BO have been approached by a dealer outside Europe wanting them to supply them with a large order of specialist BPs. To fufill the order, BO would need to employ staff on overtime rates. The client is willing to pay a premium price for availability.
How would the shadow price for labour help to identify whether this proposal will be profitable?
Do we know what the hourly rates are for labour? The standard cost for Uffico shows standard hourly rates of $22 ad $18
What might holdback the decision to accept the order? They are prepared to pay a premium, i.e. incorporate shadow prices
Using knowledge of BO, discuss benefits and issues of switch to JIT?
There are two types of JIT.
- Purchasing JIT - inventory that comes into production comes straight onto production line. No holding of raw materials.
- Production JIT - produce the products as we sell them e.g. Dell computers.
BO have 80 days of inventory sitting in accounts at 30 June 24. Is June a seasonal high point? Selling BPs to people coming out of uni ready to start work in July for instance so need a higher inventory holding amount at that time of yr
BO appear to produce at constant rate through year which provides website customers and retailers with the products when they order them
We don’t know BO approach to bulk discounts. We know about Balistic nylon and cotton fleece and they can’t but simply as when need so need some holding
How could BO use Porters generic strategies? Intro paragraph
BO sells a range of BPs sold to a high specification. This suggests BO aims to achieve competitive advantage through superior quality. To succeed with this approach a focused differentiation approach is used.
They currently focus on the market in HLand and to a lesser extent Europe.
This [unseen] issue would [support / compromise] a view that BO has adopted a focus differentiation strategy by ………
Back to Porters generic strategies - a Manager proposes competing by making budget priced backpacks. Application para
Intro paragraph followed by:
The proposed budget backpacks would compromise a view that BO has adopted a focus differentiation strategy. Why? By changing the emphasis from keeping quality high to be able to sell at a premium price compared to rivals. The low cost BP at a budget price is not compatible with customer perceptions