Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Urban > General Urban > Flashcards

General Urban Flashcards

1
Q

Massey 2000

A

Urban is centrality, innovation, cult change, soc dimensions Crucible of new mixing and creating Achieve feats far beyond indiv capabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Glaeser 2011

A

Urban density = clear path to prosperity - feature feats far beyond individual capabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pile 1996

A

Clashing point for diverse subjectivities, identities etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Savage and Warde 1993

A

Cities aren’t contained with clear boundaries - porous boundaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Agnew 1994

A

Against territorial trap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Harvey 1997

A

Relational spaces and spatial temporalities - urban is a set of conflictual heterogeneity - processes producing spatio-temporalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lefebvre 1970

A

Amorphous homogeneity of the urban - new ontological reality - metamorphosis into single, converging system. Organising planet into a single, complex, urban system. Viral.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Merrifield 2013

A

New world spatial order of boundless metrop - planetary UBS. 75% pop’ll live in urban by 2050. Urban is shapeless, boundless, tensions - Burgess model engrained in urban - now surely irrelevant Totalizing UBS = ingredient of global relational networks - converge & annihilate space by time through GBS and planetary capitalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gleeson 2012

A

Urban age - city as machine, integrated body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Giddens 1990

A

Spatial = constructed from multiplicity of social relations across scales. Capitalist construction - time and space become distorted by global finan market through immense web of global connections - necessitate a ‘transnat’ urbanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Davis 2006

A

Due to expansive nature of UBS - could experience a ‘eutopic logic’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Amin and Thrift 2002

A

Footprints of the city

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lefebvre 2003

A

City exists as a historical concept/entity. What remains are generic cities - spatially based theory thus becomes hist concept of past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dear and Dahmann 2008

A

Fact maj of world’s pop now in cities doesn’t unconditionally constitute an ‘urban world’ Attempts at clarification by contextualising urban process by reducing them to fashionable concepts fails to capture complexity of local & global transformation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Harvey 2012

A

Cities of Revolution - reclaiming public space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Burgess Model 1929

A

Mapped movement of pop groups to diff areas - organic city - urban ‘evolution’. Societal ladder - concentric circles reps process of ‘urban succession’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

50s and 60s Model

A

Theorists need to understand cause of sifting - more about capitalism - the marxist critique of the previous models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Harvey 1973, Lefebvre 1970

A

Critical of spatial & T defs of the ‘urban’ and against ‘spatial fethishism’ Urbanism prod of cap rather than people sorting selves in direct competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Castell’s Alternative 1983

A

Role of city as location of collective consumption (housing, IFS, services) - social reprod of labour power. Urban social movements - cap created situ where workers together - when agitated -> resistance: city = space of contestation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Althusser 1967

A

^ing requirement for workers to be adequately housed, healthy and educated - neo-Marxist terms: to be reproduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Harvey 1978

A

Social justice and the city - argument: moved urban form and spatial org to urban process. Arg: social justice incompatible with capitalist forms of UBS - no solution to inequality - no way to fair capital society. Money goes into city to build stuff which allows money to be generated - then cap moves to another place - city grows further. Goeg landscape grows through capital devel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Dear 2000

A

Chicago school outdated - LA as symptomatic. LA as paradigmatic city. Post metropolis - decentering, complex, polycetrnic, agglomeration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Soja 2000

A

Postmodern urbanism - splintering urbanism - patchwork quilt of postmetrop & post-mod urbanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Skeates 1997

A

‘Cherry-Picked’ spaces - splintering urbanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Robinson 2006

A

Te Ordinary City - attend to diversity of cities

26
Q

Lake 1999

A

Critique of LA - taxonomy and analysing LA PM landscape, no less detached than concentric rings of Burgess Extent of offering a new ‘way of seeing’ = a misnomer

27
Q

Wirth 1938

A

Empirically justifiable to label LA as paradigmatic? Miami one step further - melting pot of cultural and biological hybridity - no authenticity - city with no core: engineered and manufactured environ - post-mod urbanism

28
Q

Beauregard 2003

A

Shouldn’t have prototypes for cities. Paradigmatic city = parochial

29
Q

Roy 2009

A

Southern turn in urban theories?

30
Q

Amin 2004

A

Trait geogs intertwined with pol econ of urbanizing landscapes - engages us towards ‘forms of movement, encouter & excange that confound idea of bounded world regions with immutable traits’ Trait geogs in correspondence with critique of a purely territorial ontology of cities. One which interprets themm to be coms that effortlessly lend themselves to territorially defined or spatially constrained pol arrangements and choices. Against the territorial trap.

31
Q

Urban is centrality, innovation, cult change, soc dimensions Crucible of new mixing and creating Achieve feats far beyond indiv capabilities

A

Massey 2000

32
Q

Urban density = clear path to prosperity - feature feats far beyond individual capabilities

A

Glaeser 2011

33
Q

Clashing point for diverse subjectivities, identities etc.

A

Pile 1996

34
Q

Cities aren’t contained with clear boundaries - porous boundaries

A

Savage and Warde 1993

35
Q

Against territorial trap

A

Agnew 1994

36
Q

Relational spaces and spatial temporalities - urban is a set of conflictual heterogeneity - processes producing spatio-temporalities

A

Harvey 1997

37
Q

Amorphous homogeneity of the urban - new ontological reality - metamorphosis into single, converging system. Organising planet into a single, complex, urban system. Viral.

A

Lefebvre 1970

38
Q

New world spatial order of boundless metrop - planetary UBS. 75% pop’ll live in urban by 2050. Urban is shapeless, boundless, tensions - Burgess model engrained in urban - now surely irrelevant Totalizing UBS = ingredient of global relational networks - converge & annihilate space by time through GBS and planetary capitalism.

A

Merrifield 2013

39
Q

Urban age - city as machine, integrated body

A

Gleeson 2012

40
Q

Spatial = constructed from multiplicity of social relations across scales. Capitalist construction - time and space become distorted by global finan market through immense web of global connections - necessitate a ‘transnat’ urbanism

A

Giddens 1990

41
Q

Due to expansive nature of UBS - could experience a ‘eutopic logic’

A

Davis 2006

42
Q

Footprints of the city

A

Amin and Thrift 2002

43
Q

City exists as a historical concept/entity. What remains are generic cities - spatially based theory thus becomes hist concept of past

A

Lefebvre 2003

44
Q

Fact maj of world’s pop now in cities doesn’t unconditionally constitute an ‘urban world’ Attempts at clarification by contextualising urban process by reducing them to fashionable concepts fails to capture complexity of local & global transformation.

A

Dear and Dahmann 2008

45
Q

Cities of Revolution - reclaiming public space

A

Harvey 2012

46
Q

Mapped movement of pop groups to diff areas - organic city - urban ‘evolution’. Societal ladder - concentric circles reps process of ‘urban succession’

A

Burgess Model 1929

47
Q

Theorists need to understand cause of sifting - more about capitalism - the marxist critique of the previous models

A

50s and 60s Model

48
Q

Critical of spatial & T defs of the ‘urban’ and against ‘spatial fethishism’ Urbanism prod of cap rather than people sorting selves in direct competition

A

Harvey 1973, Lefebvre 1970

49
Q

Role of city as location of collective consumption (housing, IFS, services) - social reprod of labour power. Urban social movements - cap created situ where workers together - when agitated -> resistance: city = space of contestation

A

Castell’s Alternative 1983

50
Q

^ing requirement for workers to be adequately housed, healthy and educated - neo-Marxist terms: to be reproduced

A

Althusser 1967

51
Q

Social justice and the city - argument: moved urban form and spatial org to urban process. Arg: social justice incompatible with capitalist forms of UBS - no solution to inequality - no way to fair capital society. Money goes into city to build stuff which allows money to be generated - then cap moves to another place - city grows further. Goeg landscape grows through capital devel

A

Harvey 1978

52
Q

Chicago school outdated - LA as symptomatic. LA as paradigmatic city. Post metropolis - decentering, complex, polycetrnic, agglomeration

A

Dear 2000

53
Q

Postmodern urbanism - splintering urbanism - patchwork quilt of postmetrop & post-mod urbanism

A

Soja 2000

54
Q

‘Cherry-Picked’ spaces - splintering urbanism

A

Skeates 1997

55
Q

Te Ordinary City - attend to diversity of cities

A

Robinson 2006

56
Q

Critique of LA - taxonomy and analysing LA PM landscape, no less detached than concentric rings of Burgess Extent of offering a new ‘way of seeing’ = a misnomer

A

Lake 1999

57
Q

Empirically justifiable to label LA as paradigmatic? Miami one step further - melting pot of cultural and biological hybridity - no authenticity - city with no core: engineered and manufactured environ - post-mod urbanism

A

Wirth 1938

58
Q

Shouldn’t have prototypes for cities. Paradigmatic city = parochial

A

Beauregard 2003

59
Q

Southern turn in urban theories?

A

Roy 2009

60
Q

Trait geogs intertwined with pol econ of urbanizing landscapes - engages us towards ‘forms of movement, encouter & excange that confound idea of bounded world regions with immutable traits’ Trait geogs in correspondence with critique of a purely territorial ontology of cities. One which interprets themm to be coms that effortlessly lend themselves to territorially defined or spatially constrained pol arrangements and choices. Against the territorial trap.

A

Amin 2004

Urban (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions