General Questions Flashcards
Link these question types with the relevant study types
1 - aetiology
2 - how to diagnose
3 - effectiveness
4 - patient experience
5 - demographic/incidence
A - qualitative studies
B - RCTs
C - case control/cohort
D - descriptive studies
E - diagnostic test accuracy studies
1 - C
2 - E
3 - B
4 - A
5 - D
What are the 4 A’s? (And what do they mean?)
A - assess (PICOS)
A - access (NICE, evidence summaries, SRs, primary studies, expert opinion)
A - appraise (CASP)
A - apply/act (skills, cost, accessibility, plausibility)
When might the best evidence still not provide certainty about management to a patient?
- Many studies are based on population data; what my be applicable to the population may not be for an individual pt
- Multiple options available (patient’s wants & needs come first wrt potential side effects)
- ‘Best evidence’ may still not be applicable to pt (excluded groups)
- May still not be enough evidence to use certain treatments
What is the GRADE tool?
? DM lecture
Generalisability/external validity
PICO relevant to your local context?
P - patients similar in demographic/characteristics/stage of disease
I - feasibility/cost of intervention, alternatives available & effect clinically significant?
C - is the comparator the baseline treatment in my healthcare setting?
O - were all important outcomes considered?
(Benefits, harms, PROs & PROMs)
- implications for practice (would you recommend + justify why)
When asked to explore a study further, what questions could you ask?
DTA - cost of test, patient experience of using test, HCP experience
Explaining a box and whisker plot
Box = summary/point estimate for that single study - may be mean difference
Whisker = CI (precision)
Explaining where it lies in a forest plot:
- size of effect (point estimate, where lies on x-axis)
- direction of effect (position relative to line of no effect, positive/negative & significance of this)
- weight of study (size of box, given as percentage in next column)
- precision (95% CI, describe what effect the intervention could confer)
- significance of effect (whether the CI overlaps with line of no effect)
Meta-analysis/forest plot - explain the diamond at the bottom of each sub-plot
Vertical axis - point pooled estimate of studies above
Horizontal axis - CI pooled estimate
(Comment on size, direction, precision & significance of pooled estimate)
What is I2?
A quantitative measure of heterogeneity.
Heterogeneity - a measure of variation in effect sizes across included studies in a meta-analysis that is not accountable to chance
What factors may increase heterogeneity between studies?
Clinical:
Population
- types/stage of disease, severity, spread
- stage of treatment/previous intervention
- age of participants (also ethnicity, race, sex etc)
- type of treatment & where available
- motivation of people taking part (could also be affected by demographic)
Intervention
- type of intervention (ie. - definitions for ‘moderate exercise’)
- dose (duration, intensity, who delivers/self-administered?)
- support available & degree of follow up
- ease of access/some degree of healthy reproducer/ptpt effect?
Outcome
- variation in outcome measure/tools used - detection bias
Methodological:
Study design
- variation in quality of studies
- variation in study protocol (ie - levels of confounding, bias and recruitment strategies)
What is the null hypothesis (H0)
No statistically significant difference between the two groups/arms
What is evidence based practice?
The combination of:
- the best available evidence
- the doctor’s own clinical expertise
- patient’s ICE & preferences
When conducting a literature search, what must you check for at each step?
- quality
- relevance
- currency
What are evidence summaries?
Summarises existing evidence using SRs & identifies gaps in the evidence
How do clinical guidelines differ from evidence summaries?
- conduct de novo SRs
- comprehensive review of 1ry & 2ry sources & economic analysis
- addresses entire disease pathway, searches driven by need for info not restricted by quality of evidence
- use GRADE to evaluate confidence in evidence
- engage stakeholders
- develop recommendations for clinical practice