Biases Flashcards

1
Q

Selection Bias

A

Error due to systematic differences in characteristics between those selected:
1. INTO THE STUDY & NOT
2. INTO ONE ARM & NOT THE OTHER

This means these groups cannot be validly compared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of Selection Bias (6)

A
  1. Sampling
  2. Allocation
  3. Spectrum
  4. Participation
  5. Attrition (loss to follow-up)
  6. Healthy Worker Effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sampling Bias

A

When individuals don’t have EQUAL chance to be selected into the STUDY because of characteristics (interchangeable with selection bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Allocation Bias

A

RCTs - selection for treatment arms affected by characteristics

(Avoided by randomisation & ITTA to sustain that randomisation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Spectrum Bias

A

DTA - systematic error when specific groups are inappropriately excluded (‘difficult to diagnose’) making the test appear more accurate than it actually is in practice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Participation Bias

A

See also:response/responder bias

Systematic error due to different characteristics btw those who CHOOSE whether to participate/in which arm they CHOOSE to participate in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Attrition Bias (LTF)

A

Systematic error due to differences in characteristics of those who were LTF vs those who COMPLETED the study.

Even though this may be representative of characteristics of non-compliance in practice, the ptpts must be followed up or representation of outcomes will be affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Healthy Worker Effect

A

When the study population is reaped from a working population (ie - nurses in a trust) this poses a defect in the representation of morbidity and mortality as workers are more likely to not be severely ill or chronically disabled, and hence exhibit lower overall death rates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Measurement Bias

A

See also: information/observation bias

Systematic error in the way data is gathered between groups = differential quality/accuracy btw groups = difficult to compare them

NB: source either measured or measurer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of Measurement Bias (10)

A
  1. Interviewer
  2. Recall
  3. Recording
  4. Social Acceptability
  5. Detection
  6. Performance
  7. Reporting
  8. Verification
  9. Review
  10. Reflexive stance of researcher
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interviewer Bias

A

Error when the interviewer consciously/subconsciously gathers DTA differently between cases & controls.

Prevented by BLINDING.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Recall Bias

A

Systematic error when ptpts have different accuracy/completeness of recall of exposure/event depending on case/control status.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recording Bias

A

Cases recorded in more detail than controls (medical notes; questionnaires)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social Acceptability Bias

A

Selective suppression/revealing of relevant info so the most socially acceptable answer is given. (Compliance, smoking, illicit drug use etc)

To avoid: use anonymised questionnaire rather than interviewer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Detection Bias

A

Systematic differences btw groups wrt how outcomes are determined (method of assessment/diagnosis/verification)

Avoid by: BLINDING (outcome assessors - esp when subjective measures)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Performance Bias

A

(RCTs) - Systematic differences btw care provided/exposures outside of intervention (amount of attention, ancillary treatment, diagnostic investigations)

Avoid by: BLINDING participants & study personnel

17
Q

Reporting Bias

A

(SR) - Systematic differences btw groups in what’s reported/unreported

(SR - significant differences more likely to be reported)

18
Q

Verification Bias

A

DTA - systematic error when not all ptpts receive BOTH:

. INDEX TEST
. REFERENCE STANDARD

(most likely when index test = -ve)

19
Q

Review Bias

A

DTA - interpretation of index test is NOT INDEPENDENT of the reference standard & vv

(could make index look more accurate than it actually is)

To avoid: BLINDING of study personnel

20
Q

Reflexive stance of researcher

A

QUAL - relationships with ptpts &interpretation of data affected by researchers’ personal biases ( background, professional role, personality)

21
Q

What can the consequences of confounding be?

A
  • imply aberrant/false/spurious association
  • exaggerate association
  • mask association
22
Q

What is confounding?

A

Additional factors that may give rise to the outcomes & be confused for a causality relationship btw exposure & outcome when not adjusted for

True confounders are related to BOTH Exposure & Outcome

23
Q

How do you adjust for confounding?

A

Stratification/standardisation of data

Regression models
- linear
- logistic
- cox
- poisson

24
Q

Rigour

A

The quality of being extremely thorough & careful (reducing the potential for bias at every opportunity)

25
Q

How can you reduce confounding?

A

Study design - observational
(matching, stratification)
- experimental
(stratified randomisation)
Analysis (by sub-group)
- logistic regression = adjusted estimates by confounders of interest

26
Q

Intention to treat analysis

A

Analysis of the participants in the arm to which they were randomised, regardless of whether they adhered to their prescribed intervention or completed the follow up, to maintain randomisation and eliminate performance and attrition bias.

27
Q

Misclassification bias

A

Exposed/cases classified as unexposed/controls (vv)