General Evidence Flashcards
The High Court has cautioned trial judges against using their discretionary powers under Part 3.11 of the Act to re-instate the common law rules of evidence.
Papakosmos [1999] HCA
Which section states that the EA 2008 applies to “proceedings in a Victorian Court”.
s 4 Evidence Act 2008
This Act applies to all proceedings in a Victorian court…
Which section of the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) provides the general rule that all witnesses are competent and compellable?
s 12 Evidence Act 2008
Which section of the Victorian Evidence Act provides for cross examination of an “unfavourable witnesses”?
s 38 Evidence Act 2008
What is the test and section for relevance under the UEA?
See s 55 Evidence Act 2008.
‘Could rationally affect (directly or indirectly) the assessment of the probability of the existence of a fact in issue…’
What is the test and section for the hearsay rule under the uniform evidence acts?
s 59 Evidence Act 2008
‘Evidence of a previous representation made by a person is not admissible to prove the existence of a fact that it can reasonably be supposed that the person intended to assert by the representation.’
If evidence is admissible for a non hearsay purpose, it is admissable for a hearsay purpose.
s 60 Evidence Act 2008
What is the section and pre-requisites for the “maker not available” exception to the hearsay rule in civil proceedings?
The hearsay rule does not apply in civil proceedings if the maker is not available (s 63) AND: - it is first hand hearsay (s 62); and - Section 67 notice is provided.
What is the section and “pre requisites” for the “maker available and will be called” exception to the hearsay rule?
Hearsay rule does not apply if the maker of the representation is to be called (s 64(3)) AND - it is first hand hearsay (s 62).
Which section means that the credibility rule does not apply if it could substantially affect the credibility of a witness in cross examination?
Section 103(1) Evidence Act 2008 (Vic)
If you are dealing with an unfavourable witness, what are the four steps required to deal with them?
- Examination in chief; 2. If they can’t remember, seek leave to refresh memory with statement: s 32 UEA 3. If they are still obstructive, cross examine under s 38 UEA. 4. If they are still obstructive and recant from earlier statement, tender a copy of statement (s 48, 103(1)). This then becomes weak, unsworn evidence of its truth (s 60).
Which section of the UEA provides that a witness that fails to comply with a subpoena can be arrested?
Section 194 Evidence Act 2008 (Vic)
Which section provides for the “opinion rule”?
Section 76 UEA
Which section allows a person to give an opinion based of their specialised training, study or experience?
Section 79 UEA
“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”
― Harlan Ellison (1934 - )
Prolific American writer of short stories, novellas, teleplays, essays, and criticism
Which section allows a lay opinion to be given when it is necessary for the witnesses’ evidence to be understood?
Section 78 UEA
Which section provides that an admission is inadmissable if it is influenced by violent, oppressive, inhuman or degrading conduct (VOID) conduct?
Section 84 UEA
Evidence may be so ambigious as to be irrelevant.
Lithgow City Council v Jackson [2011] HCA
Ambulance office - ? Fell 1.5 meters - unable to logically impact probability either way.
Evidence is to be weighed according to the proof that was within the power of one side to produce and power of the other to contradict.
Blatch v Archer (1774) per Lord Mansfield.
Sheriff - whether arrest of debtor lawful - son not called to give evidence of supervision.
Which jurisdictions have not adopted the Uniform Evidence Act?
Western Australia, South Australia, Queensland.
Which section of the UEA allows for the exclusion of improperly or illegally obtained evidence?
s 138 Evidence Act 2008 (Vic)
…not to be admitted unless the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighs…
Improperly obtained evidence is excluded on the basis of public policy - judicial approval cannot be given to illicit investigative procedures.
Bunning v Cross [1978] HCA
Driver clearly drunk - “preliminary test’ not administered - conviction upheld.