Documentary Evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the three steps in using a document in evidence?

A

Tendering, authenticating and admissibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does section 48 of the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) provide?

A

The means of tendering documents in court, including: a copy (1)(b)(I).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What section allows tendering of a summary of voluminous or complex documents?

A

s 50 Evidence Act 2008 Vic. In summarising the documents, the opinion rule is expressly stated not to apply: s 50(3).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which section abolishes the common law rule that the original document is required to be tendered?

A

s 51 Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) However, it has been academically noted that the original document rule might have renewed relevance in the context of electronic documents - should we be allowing lawyers to copy and paste summaries of cha room conversations into word documents?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is authentication?

A

An evidentiary basis that the jury could accept that the document is what it says it is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which section allows a court to inspect a document and draw any reasonable inference about it, including as to its authenticity or identity?

A

Section 58 Evidence Act 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case states that despite that authentication is still required under the UEA?

A

NAB v Rusu [1999] NSWSC per Bryson J Suggested that inference under s 58 insufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A party may serve a notice on the other party calling on them to admit the authenticity of documents.

A

O 35.05 Supreme Court Rules Vic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To pass the admissibility gateway, why are contractual documents and documents recording misleading and deceptive statements not subject to the hearsay rule under s 59?

A

Because the purpose of tendering those documents is not to prove the statements are true, only that they were made: Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] PC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The combination of which sections combine to make the sender information in an email admissible evidence of when the email was sent, and to whom?

A

Three stage process: 1. Evidence of time, sender and sendee is not hearsay and is therefore admissible evidence: s 71 2. Not only is it admissible evidence, but s 161 (Electronic Communications) makes it prima facie proof of time of delivery and sender and recipient. This interplays nicely with s 13 ETA governing the time of service of emails etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which section assists with authentication by presuming a copy of a document made with a machine is the same as the original?

A

Section 146 Evidence Act (Vic) Example It would not be necessary to call evidence to prove that a photocopier normally produced complete copies of documents and that it was working properly when it was used to photocopy a particular document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which section provides that documents older than 20 years produced from proper custody are prima facie authentic?

A

Section 152 Evidence Act 2008 (Vic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aside from when the author is available or unavailable, what are the four common means of circumventing the hearsay rule with documentary evidence?

A
  1. Business records: s69
  2. Admissions: s81
  3. Contemperaneous representations health, feelings, sensations, intention, knowledge or state of mind: s 66A (i.e. on smartphone)
  4. Copies of contracts etc: Subramaniam
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which section allows for “negative hearsay”?

A

s 69(4) Evidence Act 2008 (Vic)

Where a system of business records has been followed of making and keeping a record of all events of a particular kind, s 69(4) permits proof that such an act did not occur if no record of it has been kept in that system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly