General Defences (Consent, Self-Defence, Duress) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What crimes can consent be used as a defence to?

A

Assault and battery, not s47, s20 or s18 unless an exception applies, never murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case shows organized sport as an exception?

A

R v Barnes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When would a foul in sports be considered a crime?

A

When it is outside of what is expected in the sport, and is sufficiently grave to be categorized as criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

True or false, surgery and tattoos and piercings are all accepted exceptions

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by branding and which case shows this is accepted?

A

Burning or scratching markings into the skin of another, R v Wilson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant by horseplay and which case showed this was accepted?

A

Play fighting or messing around, R v Aitken

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

True or false, a mistaken belief of consent is not valid, V must give consent personally

A

False, if there is a genuine mistake and the D thought the V had consented it is still a defence, R v Jones, this still applies if drunken, Richardson & Irwin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by consent must be valid and informed?

A

D must know what they are consenting to, e.g. in Tabassum the women thought the man was a doctor, this was not true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is meant by the Gillick competent?

A

Defines that children cannot consent as they do not have a sufficient understanding of what is being proposed, e.g. getting tattoos in Burrell and Harmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can consent be implied?

A

Yes, Wilson & Pringle, consent is implied in the everyday jostling’s of life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where is self-defence contained?

A

s76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 as amended by the Crime & Courts Act 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What must the defendant believe that force is in the circumstances?

A
  • Believe it was necessary, to fend off an imminent attack
  • s76(3) CJAI, does not matter if a mistaken belief
  • s76(6) CJAI, not required for the D to attempt retreat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What must force be in the circumstances?

A
  • Reasonable, not reasonable if disproportionate under s76(6) CJAI
  • s76(7) CJAI, not expected to stop and think, expected they have reacted instinctively
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Duress by Threats?

A

-Where D has MR and AR, however a full defence if they can show if they did not commit it, they would be subject to serious injury or death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must there be between the threat and the crime and what case shows this?

A
  • Causal link, must be threatened to commit a specific offence
  • R v Cole
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What must the threat be of and who can this be made to?

A
  • Serious injury or death, towards the D, immediate family or someone they would reasonably regard themselves as responsible for
  • R v Valderrama-Vega
17
Q

What is the Graham test?

A
  • Did the D act because he reasonably believed he had good cause to fear serious injury or death
  • Would a sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the characteristics, respond in the same way
18
Q

What things can and can’t be considered when applying the Graham test?

A
  • Allows age, sex, disability, psychiatric order

- Doesn’t allow low IQ, intoxication, addictions

19
Q

What must the threat be if not immediate and what case shows this?

A

-Imminent, R v Hasan

20
Q

What is meant by self-induced duress?

A
  • If the D voluntarily places himself in a situation where he will be threatened to commit crime, he cannot rely on the defence
  • R v Sharp, member of a gang
21
Q

What is duress of circumstances and what case shows us this?

A
  • Threat does not come from a person but the circumstances the D finds himself in
  • R v Willer