General Defences (Consent, Self-Defence, Duress) Flashcards
What crimes can consent be used as a defence to?
Assault and battery, not s47, s20 or s18 unless an exception applies, never murder
What case shows organized sport as an exception?
R v Barnes
When would a foul in sports be considered a crime?
When it is outside of what is expected in the sport, and is sufficiently grave to be categorized as criminal
True or false, surgery and tattoos and piercings are all accepted exceptions
True
What is meant by branding and which case shows this is accepted?
Burning or scratching markings into the skin of another, R v Wilson
What is meant by horseplay and which case showed this was accepted?
Play fighting or messing around, R v Aitken
True or false, a mistaken belief of consent is not valid, V must give consent personally
False, if there is a genuine mistake and the D thought the V had consented it is still a defence, R v Jones, this still applies if drunken, Richardson & Irwin
What is meant by consent must be valid and informed?
D must know what they are consenting to, e.g. in Tabassum the women thought the man was a doctor, this was not true
What is meant by the Gillick competent?
Defines that children cannot consent as they do not have a sufficient understanding of what is being proposed, e.g. getting tattoos in Burrell and Harmer
Can consent be implied?
Yes, Wilson & Pringle, consent is implied in the everyday jostling’s of life
Where is self-defence contained?
s76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 as amended by the Crime & Courts Act 2013
What must the defendant believe that force is in the circumstances?
- Believe it was necessary, to fend off an imminent attack
- s76(3) CJAI, does not matter if a mistaken belief
- s76(6) CJAI, not required for the D to attempt retreat
What must force be in the circumstances?
- Reasonable, not reasonable if disproportionate under s76(6) CJAI
- s76(7) CJAI, not expected to stop and think, expected they have reacted instinctively
What is Duress by Threats?
-Where D has MR and AR, however a full defence if they can show if they did not commit it, they would be subject to serious injury or death
What must there be between the threat and the crime and what case shows this?
- Causal link, must be threatened to commit a specific offence
- R v Cole