General Content Flashcards
What are the 4 definitions for abnormality?
- Statistical Infrequency
- Deviation from social norms
- Failure to function adequately
- Deviation from ideal mental health
Outline statistical infrequency including an example
- According to the statistical infrequency definition, a behaviour is seen as abnormal if it is statistically uncommon or not seen very often in society
- Therefore abnormality is determined by looking at the distribution of a particular behaviour within society
- For example:
- the average IQ is approx 100 and 65% of the population have an IQ in the region of 85 to 115
- 95% of the population have an IQ in the region of 70 to 130
- However, a small % (approx 5%) have an IQ below 70 or above 130 and these people are statistically uncommon and would be classified as abnormal
- A normal distribution curve can be used to represent the proportions of the population who share a particular characteristic
Evaluation of Statistical Infrequency
Limitation; Labelling
- Labelling an individual as abnormal can be unhelpful
- This is especially true of someone with a low IQ since they will be able to live happily without distress to themselves or others
- Such a label may contribute to poor self-image
- This means that being labelled as statistically infrequent could cause the person more distress than the condition itself
Evaluation of Statistical Infrequency
Limitation: Some abnormal traits could be desirable
- Some statistically infrequent behaviours labelled as abnormal could be desirable traits
- For example:
- Having an high IQ is very unusual yet it is hugely celebrated
- Conversely, depression is experienced by many but not desirable
- Therefore it needs to identify those behaviours which are both infrequent and undesirable to avoid this pitfall
Outline what is meant by deviation from social norms including an example
- A social norm is an unwritten rule about what is acceptable within a particular society
- Therefore, a person would be seen as abnormal if their thinking or behaviour violates these unwritten rules
- For example:
- Someone walking around the streets of London naked would be seen as abnormal
- But the same behaviour in remote african tribes would be considered perfectly normal as part of their culture
Evaluation of deviation from social norms
Cultural Relativism
- One issue is the idea of cultural relativism
- Social norms differ between cultures and what is considered normal in one culture may be abnormal in another
- For example, in approx 75 countries homosexuality is still illegal and therefore considered abnormal. However in the rest of the world it’s considered normal
- The result of this is that there is no global standard and therefore abnormality isn’t standardised
Evaluation of deviation from social norms
Incomplete explanation
- How far an individual deviates from a social norm is mediated by the degree of severity and the context
- For example, when someone breaks a social norm once this may not be deviant behaviour, but the persistent repetition of such behaviour could be evidence of psychological disturbance
- Likewise, someone walking topless on a beach would be normal but doing that in the office would be viewed as abnormal
- As a consequence this definition fails to offer a complete explanation in its own right since it is related to degree and context
Outline what is meant by failure to function (ffa) adequately- use an example
- According to the FFA definition of abnormality, a person is considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life and live independently in society
- To be classified as abnormal, a person’s behaviour should cause personal suffering and distress because of their failure to cope
- However, they may also cause distress to others who observe them
- For example: someone with depression may struggle to get out of bed and go to work or they may find it difficult to communicate with others
- They would be considered abnormal as their depression is causing an inability to cope with everyday life while also causing distress to family + friends
- Rosenhan and Seligman=
- They proposed signs used to determine if someone isn’t coping:
1) No longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules eg maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space
2) Experiences of severe personal distress
3) Behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to either themselves or others
Evaluate Failure to Function Adequately
Considers Personal Experiences
- 1 strength is that it considers the subjective personal experiences of the patient
- This definition considers the thoughts and feelings of the person experiencing the issue
- It doesn’t simply make a judgement without taking the personal viewpoint of the sufferer into consideration
- Suggesting that FFA definition is a useful model for assessing psychopathological behaviour
Evaluate Failure to Function Adequately
Confusion with Deviation from Social Norms
- Often there’s confusion with distinguishing between failure to function adequately and deviation from social norms
- Sometimes a behaviour which appears to be a failure to function adequately, such as not being able to go to work, may in fact also be a deviation from the social norm
- That person may be choosing to live an alternative lifestyle out of the common system for that society
- It’s therefore difficult to ascertain if this behaviour should be considered maladaptive
Outline what is meant by deviation from ideal mental health
- Jahoda suggested that abnormal behaviour should be defined by the absence of particular characteristics (eg behaviours which move away from ideal mental health)
- Similar to the approach taken by the medical profession for measures of physical health such as having high blood pressure within the normal range
- She proposed 6 principles for ideal mental health:
1) Positive view of yourself (high self-esteem) with a strong sense of identity
2) Being capable of personal growth and self-actualisation
3) Being independent of others and self-regulating
4) Having an accurate view of reality
5) Being able to integrate and resist stress
6) Being able to master your environment (love, friendships, work +leisure time) - If an individual doesn’t show one of these criteria they would be classified as abnormal
Evaluation of deviation from Ideal mental health
Unrealistic criteria
- 1 weakness is the unrealistic criteria Jahoda proposed
- There are times when everyone will experience stress and negativity, eg grieving
- However, according to this definition, these people would be classified as abnormal irrespective of the circumstances which are outside of their control
- With the high standards set by these criteria, how many need to be absent for diagnosis to occur must be questioned
Evaluation of deviation from Ideal mental health
Cultural relativism
- An issue is cultural relativism
- Some of Jahoda’s criteria could be considered Western origin
- For example, her emphasis on personal growth and development may be considered overly self-centred in other countries who favour community over individualism
- Likewise, Independence within collectivist cultures isn’t fostered thus making the definition cultural bound
What is a phobia?
An anxiety disorder which causes an irrational fear of a particular object or situation
And the extent of the fear is out of all proportion to any real danger presented by the phobic stimuli
What are the 3 categories of a phobia?
- Simple phobias
- Social phobias
- Agoraphobia
What is a simple phobia?
- The most common type
- This is where a person fears a specific object in the environment such as the fear of dogs
What is a social phobia?
- Social phobias involve feelings of anxiety in social situations such as giving a speech in public
- Sufferers feel like they are being judged, which leads to feelings of inadequacy
What is agoraphobia?
- It is a fear of open or public spaces
- Sufferers may experience panic attacks and anxiety, which make them feel vulnerable in open spaces
What are the 3 types of characteristics of phobias?
Behavioural, emotional and cognitive
Outline 2 behavioural characteristics of phobias
- Behavioural characteristics can be divided into 3:
1) Key behaviour is avoidance= if a person with a phobia is presented with the object or situation they fear their immediate response is to avoid it - However people aren’t always able to avoid their fears and sometimes they come face-to-face with an object/situation they fear
2) This results in Panic=causing high levels of stress and anxiety
3) Sometimes the fear is so intense the person ‘freezes’= which is part of the fight or flight response- and is an adaptive response to make a predator think that their prey is dead
Outline emotional characteristics of phobias
- The key emotional characteristics are excessive and unreasonable fear, anxiety and panic
- An excessive emotional response is triggered by the presence or anticipation of a specific object/ situation
- Emotional responses are unreasonable and disproportionate to the danger posed by the stimulus
Outline cognitive characteristics of phobias
- Cognitive characteristics are also divided into 2: selective attention and irrational beliefs
- Selective attention: If a person with a phobia is presented with an object they fear, they will find it difficult to direct their attention elsewhere causing them to become fixated on the object
- Irrational beliefs: a persons phobia is defined by their irrational thinking towards the object or situation such as people with arachnophobia may believe all spiders are deadly even though there are no deadly ones in the UK
What is the two process model?
Mowrer proposed the model to explain how phobias are learned through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning
Describe the role of classical conditioning in the 2 process model
- It is a process of learning by associating 2 stimuli together to condition a response
- The process of classical conditioning can explain how we associate something we do not fear (neutral stimulus), for example a lift with something which triggers a fear response (unconditioned response), for example being trapped
- After association has formed the lift (now a conditioned stimulus) causes a response of fear (conditioned response)
- Consequently we develop a phobia of the lift following a single incident of being trapped
Outline the key study by Watson and Raynor. Refer to aims, method, results and findings
(may not need for AO1, and could instead use it for AO3)
- aim= See whether a fear response could be learned through classical conditioning
- method= ppt was an 11 month old called ‘Little Albert’
- Before experiment Albert showed no response to various objects including a white rat
- To examine if they could induce a fear response they struck a metal bar with a hammer behind Albert’s head, causing a loud noise every time he went to reach for the white rat
- They did this x3
- Results= thereafter he began to cry every time he saw the white rat
- Conclusion= Showed that a fear response could be induced through the process of classical conditioning
- Albert also developed a fear towards similar objects including Santa’s beard
- Albert had generalised his fear to other white furry objects
Describe the role of operant conditioning in the 2 process model
- According to Mowrer, our phobias are maintained through operant conditioning and they are negatively reinforced
- This is where a behaviour is strengthened because an unpleasant consequence is removed
- EG, if a person with a phobia of lifts always takes the stairs, then they are consequently avoiding their phobia= negative reinforcement
- Makes the person more likely to repeat this behaviour (avoidance) in the future and maintain their phobia
Evaluation of the 2-process model
Research evidence
- Research evidence supports the behavioural explanation
- Watson and Rayner demonstrated the process of classical conditioning in the formation of a phobia in Little Albert, who was conditioned to fear white rats
- This supports the idea that classical conditioning is involved in acquiring phobias and that generalisation can occur
- However, since this is a case study, it is difficult to generalise the findings to other children or even adults due to the unique nature of the investigation
Evaluation of the 2-process model
Application to Therapy
- A strength is its application to therapy
- Behaviourists ideas have been used to develop treatments, including systematic desensitisation and flooding
- Systematic desensitisation helps people unlearn their fears, using the principles of classical conditioning while flooding prevents people from avoiding their phobias and stop negative reinforcement from taking place
- Consequently these therapies have been successfully used to treat people with phobias providing further support for the effectiveness of the behaviourist explanation
Evaluation of the 2-process model
Elements are ignored
- Behaviourist explanation for the development of phobias ignored the role of cognition
- Phobias may develop as a result of irrational thinking, not just learning
- For example, sufferers of claustrophobia may think; ‘L am going to be trapped in this lift and suffocate’, which is an irrational thought that is not taken into consideration in the behaviourist explanation
- Furthermore, the cognitive approach has also led to the development of CBT which is said to be more effective than the behaviourist treatments
Evaluation of the 2-process model
Importance of evolutionary factors
- There’s a claim that the behaviourist approach may not provide a complete explanation of phobias
- For example, Bounton highlights that evolutionary factors could play a role in phobias, especially if the avoidance of a particular stimulus could have caused pain or death to our ancestors
- Evolutionary perspectives suggest phobias are not learned but are innate as such phobias acted as survival mechanisms for our ancestors
- This innate predisposition to certain phobias is called biological preparedness (Seligman) and casts doubts on the 2-process model since it suggests that there is more to phobias than learning
Name 2 behavioural therapies for phobias
- systematic desensitisation
- flooding