General Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Actus reas consist of two things:

A

a voluntary act and the resulting social harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

theory of punishment that’s goal is to “prevent future crimes”

A

utilitarianism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

belief that threat or imposition of punishment can deter crime and people will avoid criminal activity if the perceived punishment outweighs the criminal rewards

A

utilitarian theory of punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

theory of punishment that’s goal is to “punish in proportion to culpable wrong even if it doesn’t prevent future crime

A

retributive theory of punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

belief that punishment is justified when it is deserved, deserved when person freely violates society’s rules, punished even if it does not decrease future crimes

A

retributive theory of punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A person has to legal duty to:

A

act to prevent harm to another, even if they can do it as to risk to their self, and even if the person imperiled may lose their life in the absence of assistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Exceptions to omission:

A

Status relationship, contractual obligation, creation of risk, or voluntary assistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exception to omission by status relationship:

A

if the legal protector of another knowing such person to be in peril of life, willfully or negligently fails to make reasonable efforts to rescue them without jeopardizing their own life or lives of others if guilty of manslaughter if the omission is the reason the person dies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples of status relationships (relationships where people are obligated to act to prevent harm to another)

A

parents and children, married couples, masters and servants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contractual obligation (exception to omission):

A

one who has custody of a human, helpless from imprisonment, infancy, sickness, etc. is bound to help them with proper diligence and will be held guilty of manslaughter, if by culpable negligence, the helpless person dies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Examples of contractual obligation (exception to omission):

A

babysitters owes an implied contractual duty to protect; doctors have contractual duty to provide medical care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Creation of a risk (exception to omission)

A

person who wrongfully harms another or another’s property, or who wrongfully places a person or their property in risk of harm has a duty to aid injured person or endangered party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Voluntary assistance (exception to omission)

A

if you start helping someone in jeopardy, you have a duty to keep helping them, if a subsequent omission would put the victim in a worse position than if actor has not initiated help (applies even if actor did not originally have a legal duty)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

knowingly procured or received property possessed or that D failed to dispose of the object after they became aware of its presence

A

possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Not guilty of possession if contraband is:

A

planted on you and you don’t have sufficient time to terminate possession after learning of its presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

For possession, D has to be aware of the possession of the object but doesn’t need to be aware of:

A

it’s illegality or true nature

17
Q

When has a person acted with “mens rea” (broad definition)?

A

if they committed the actus reus of an offense with a “vicious will,” “evil mind,” “morally blameworthy” or “culpable” state of mind

18
Q

narrow definition of mens rea

A

if, but only if, a person commits the actus read of an offense with the particular mental state set out expressly in the definition of that offense (also called the “elemental” definition of mens rea)

19
Q

CL definition of intentionally

A

( 1 ) it was her conscious object to cause the result; or ( 2 ) if she knew that the harm was virtually certain to occur as the result of her conduct

20
Q

CL definition of knowingly (some offenses require proof that the actor had knowledge of an attendant circumstance)

A

(1) is aware of the fact; (2) correctly believes it exists; or (3) suspects that it exists and purposely avoids learning if her suspicion is correct (willful blindness)

21
Q

willful blindness (CL)

A

aware of high probability of the existence of the attendant circumstance AND (1) takes deliberate action to avoid confirming the fact OR (2) purposefully fails to investigate in order to avoid confirmation

22
Q

recklessly (CL)

A

actor disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk of which he was aware

23
Q

negligently (CL)

A

gross deviation from the reasonable person standard (occurs when B

24
Q

CL general intent

A

only mindset needed is to intend to voluntarily commit the social harm (ex. intent to enter into a house)

25
Q

CL specific intent

A

offenses explicitly contains one of the following mens rea elements:

  • intent to commit some act over and beyond the actus reds of the offense or
  • a special motive for committing the actus reus offense or
  • awareness of a particular attendant circumstance
26
Q

transferred intent (CL)

A

intent “follows the bullet”; if you shoot someone and unless the offense requires that D’s criminal intent be directed towards the actual victim

27
Q

CL malice (not in murder)

A

a person acts with “malice” if she intentionally or recklessly causes the social harm of an offense

28
Q

MPC mens rea requirement

A

Except as in 2.05, a person is not guilty of an offense unless he acted purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently, as the law may require, with respect to each material element of the offense

29
Q

MPC intent/purpose (CL “intentionally” is not used in MPC)

A

their conscious object to cause the result

30
Q

MPC “knowingly”

A

she is aware that the result is “practically certain” to result from her conduct or he is aware that the circumstance exists, or if he is aware “of a high probability of its existence, unless he actually believes that it does not exist”

31
Q

MPC “recklessly”

A

acts recklessly with respect to a material element of an offense when he consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from his conduct

32
Q

MPC “negligence”

A

should be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the material element exists or will result from his conduct

33
Q

Is there strict liability under MPC?

A

no

34
Q

CL mens rea for complicity

A

intentionally act to aid in the facilitation or commission of the offense AND act with a level of culpability required in the commission the offense or had knowledge that principal intended its commission at time of giving aid or encouragement

35
Q

In CL, you are liable as an accomplice if:

A

conduct assists in the commission of the offense

36
Q

MPC accomplice liability

A

person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by his own conduct or by the conduct of another person for which he is legally responsible or both

37
Q

Under the MPC, a person is an accomplice if:

A

With the purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of the offense:
(1)solicits other person to commit it OR (2) aids or agrees or attempts to aid such other person in planning it OR having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, fails to make proper effort to do so, OR his conduct is expressly declared by law to establish his complicity

38
Q

jury nullification

A

jury has power to acquit defendant even if it is proven that they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, if they feel that acquitting them would better serve the principles of justice

39
Q

a conviction upon circumstantial evidence alone cannot be sustained unless:

A

the circumstances are inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence