General Flashcards

1
Q

what makes something a crime?

A

conduct which will incur a formal and solemn pronouncement of the moral condemnation of the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the five theories of punishment?

A

retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define the retribution theory of punishment

A

individual gets what he deserves, society gets revenge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define the deterrence theory of retribution

A

people will avoid crimes because they fear punishment suffered by others (speeding fines)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define the incapacitation theory of punishment

A

make it impossible for criminal to re-offend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define the education theory of punishment?

A

publicity of the behavior and its consequences (click it or ticket)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the three factors of proportionality?

A

gravity of offense, sentences imposed on other criminals in the same juris., sentences imposed on other criminals for crime in other juris.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the three standards of proof?

A

beyond a reasonable doubt, preponderance of the evidence, clear and convincing evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the two “malum” versions of statutory interpretation?

A

malum in se (bad in itself), malum prohibitum (bad according to rulemakers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the rule of lenity?

A

interpret statutes narrowly so that a defendant is not convicted for a crime about which they may not have been aware

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the five elements of a crime?

A

actus reus, mens rea, causation, attendant circumstances, concurrence of the elements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define an attendant circumstance

A

condition that must be present at the time of the actus reus that contributes to the determination that the act is a crime, without which the same act and intent would not be criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define actus reus

A

voluntary act that causes social harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what four things are NOT classified as voluntary acts?

A

reflexes/convulsions, bodily movements during unconsciousness/sleep, conduct during hypnosis, bodily movement not a product of effort of actor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

six times one has a duty to act

A

statute imposes duty to care, relationship, contractual duty (doctor), voluntarily assumed care, omission ollowing an act, creation of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what defines a specific intent crime?

A

intent to commit offense, with intent for a particular outcome to occur

17
Q

what defines a general intent crime?

A

must prove that the defendant engaged consciously in the conduct, but don’t have to prove that they intended any particular result

18
Q

what are the two MPC types of specific intent crimes?

A

purposefully and knowingly

19
Q

what are the two MPC types of general intent crimes?

A

recklessly and negligently

20
Q

define “purposefully” for MPC specific intent

A

conscious object to engage in the conduct, aware of such circumstances or believes/hopes they exist

21
Q

define “knowingly” for MPC specific intent

A

aware that it is practically certain his conduct will cause such a result

22
Q

define “recklessly” for MPC general intent

A

consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk, involving a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a law abiding person would observe

23
Q

define “negligently” for MPC general intent

A

should be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk and his behavior involves a gross deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would observe

24
Q

define “transferred intent”

A

if a defendant intended a harmful result to a particular person or object and in trying to carry out that intent, caused a similar harmful result to another, intent is transferred

25
Q

what is the mens rea of strict liability crimes?

A

no mens rea - doesn’t matter why you did it, just that you did it

26
Q

when is “mistake of fact” a defense for specific and general intent crimes for common law?

A

any mistake is a defense for specific intent, reasonable mistakes only as defense to general intent

27
Q

when is mistake of fact or law a valid defense under MPC?

A

mistake of fact or law is a valid defense for MPC

28
Q

what are the only three ways you can use “mistake of law” defense under common law?

A

mistakes that negate mens rea, authorized reliance doctrine, due process limitations

29
Q

explain the need for “causation” element of a crime

A

to be criminally liable, the defendant must cause the harm

30
Q

what are the two “types” of causation?

A

defendant’s conduct must be both the cause in fact and the proximate cause of the crime

31
Q

define “cause in fact” as related to causation

A

the harm would not have occurred BUT FOR the defendant’s actions

32
Q

define “proximate cause” as related to causation

A

if there are no intervening causes that would break the chain of causation

33
Q

define an “independent intervening cause”

A

is it a mere coincidence? if so, there’s no causation unless the event was foreseeable

34
Q

define a “dependent intervening cause”

A

is it a response? if so, there’s causation unless some other abnormal event occurs

35
Q

Define the ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ standard of proof

A

Govt must prove that the defendant committed the crime to such an extent that none of the jurors harbor a sufficient doubt

36
Q

define “obstructed cause” as related to causation

A

if a person shoots someone, but doesn’t kill, they’re not liable if someone later causes the victim’s death

37
Q

define “utilitarian theory” as related to theories of punishment

A

one justified primarily by preventing future harms

38
Q

define “willful blindness”

A

one may not intentionally close his eyes to what would otherwise be obvious to him