Gene expression of viral genomes: Translation strategies Flashcards

1
Q

Structure of eukaryotic mRNAs

A

5 ́cap: Binding of initiations factors
5 ́UTR: 50-100 bases
monocistronic: one ORF
3 ́UTR: PolyA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Structure of prokaryotic mRNA

A

no cap, but Shine-Dalgarno sequence polycistronic composition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

5’ cap structure -> Functions

A
  • marks the 5’-end of the first exon and aids in the splicing process
    (i) essential for nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of mRNAs through interaction with nuclear cap-binding proteins
    (ii) increases the efficiency of translation by targeting formation of the preinitiation complex (cytoplasmic cap-binding proteins)
    (iii) protects the transcript from 5’→3’ exoribonucleolytic activities
    (iv) Blocks recognition of viral RNAs by an antiviral defense mechanism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Enzymatic reactions required for mRNA 5’-capping

A
  • most eukaryotic mRNAs are capped at the 5’ end during nuclear processing
  • the terminal 5’ phosphate is first removed by a 5’ triphosphatase
  • Guanyltransferase transfers GMP from GTP to the 5’ end of the mRNA to add the GpppN cap structure
  • the 5’ terminal inverted G residue is the modified by methylation
  • many RNA viruses replicate in the cytoplasm and must use a viral dependent capping mechanism supplied by the RNA-dependent-RNA Polymerase
  • the Cap structure, m7GpppN, is most common in viral and mammalian mRNAs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Many viruses have capped genomic RNAs similar to eukaryotic host mRNAs

A
  • Cap structures of viral mRNAs are made in a variety of ways:
    1) de novo synthesis by cellular enzymes (Adenoviridae, Hepadnaviridae, Herpesviridae, Papillomaviridae, Parvoviridae, Retroviridae, Polyomaviridae)
    2) synthesis by viral enzymes (Reoviridae, Rhabdoviridae, Togaviridae, Poxviridae)
    3) acquisition of preformed 5’cap structures from cellular pre-mRNAs or mRNAs (Bunyaviridae, Arenaviridae, orthomyxoviridae)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Unconventional viral capping pathways

A
  • Covalent enzyme-pNp-RNA intermediate with the nacent viral RNA
  • Transfer of GDP to the RNA 5‘ end
  • First 2‘O-methylation, followed by methylation at the guanine-N7 position
  • Covalent enzyme- m7G- Intermediate
  • Transfer of m7G to the RNA 5‘ end
  • No 2‘O- methylation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3’ processing of mRNA in eukaryotes

A

(1) An enzyme complex recognizes the polyadenylation signal (AAUAAA) and a less well conserved G-U rich sequence located 20-40 nucleotides downstream.
(2) An endonuclease cleaves the primary transcript 10-30 nucleotides downstream of the AAUAAA signal.
(3) A series of 80-250 A residues are added to the 3’-end of the cleaved transcript by polyadenylate polymerase.
Like the 5‘ cap-structure the 3’ poly (A) tail was first identified in a viral mRNA (reovirus mRNA)
Functions:
(1) stabilizes the mRNA
(2) increases the efficiency of translation
There are examples of mRNAs without a poly (A) tail

viral
- reoviral mRNA
- arenaviral mRNA
- flaviviral mRNA
- Pestiviral mRNA
- Hepaciviral mRNA

cellular
- histone mRNA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Viral strategies of translation

A

Animal viruses are completely dependent on the host cell machinery for translation of their mRNAs

Special feature of viral translation:
Many viruses use translation strategies to maximize the coding capacity of their genomes of limited size
- functional polycistronic mRNAs
- readthrough of stop codons
- polyproteins

Virus infection often results in modification of the host‘s translational machinery to translate selectively the viral mRNAs
-> „host cell shut-off“

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Genetic Economy: one primary transcript - multiple translation products

A
  • Polyprotein Processing

Initiation at different start codons
*Reinitiation
*Leaky scanning
*Internal ribosomal entry
*Ribosomal shunting

Changing the translational reading frame
*Splicing
*Ribosomal frameshifting
*RNA editing

  • Translational read through of stop codons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Initiation

A

*Rate limiting step
*Requires hydrolysis of ATP and GTP
*Results in formation of a complex containing the mRNA, the ribosome and the initiator Met- tRNAi
A. 5’ end (Cap) dependent initiation
* The initiation complex binds to the 5’ cap structure and scans in a 5’ to 3’ direction until initiating AUG is encountered
B. Internal ribosome entry
* Initiation complex binds upstream of initiation codon (EMCV IRES, Poliovirus IRES or directly at the start codon (BVDV/HCV IRES; CrPV-IRES)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5’ end (cap) dependent initiation

A
  • The first step is the recognition of the 5’ cap by eIF4F, which consists of three proteins, eIF4E, eIF4G and eIF4A.
  • The cap binding protein eIF4E binds to the 5’ cap
  • The N-terminus of eIF4G binds eIF4E and the C-terminus binds eIF4A
  • The 40S subunit binds to eIF4G via eIF3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cap-dependent initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotes

A

An initiation complex forms at the cap with the 40S ribosomal subunit and other translation initiation factors.
The 40S complex then scans down the 5’ untranslated region to the first AUG codon.
A GTP hydrolysis step by eIF5 triggers GDP binding of eIF2 and release of initiation proteins.
The 60S subunit joins the complex and the 80S ribosome initiates translate the ORF.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elongation

A

Ribosome selects aminoacylated tRNA
eEF1a and GTP are bound to aminoacylated tRNA
Ribosome catalyzes formation of a peptide bond
Translocation is dependent on eEF2 and GTP hydrolysis
Many ribosomes may translate mRNAs simultaneously on the same strand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Termination

A

*Translation is terminated at one of three stop codons (UAA, UAG & UGA).
* Termination codon at the A site is recognized by the release factor instead of a tRNA
* The release factor binds the termination codon
* The peptide chain is then released followed by dissociation of the tRNA and the ribosome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Closed loop model

A
  • The 5’ end dependent initiation is stimulated by the poly(A) binding protein Pabp1p, which interacts with eIF4G
  • This interaction circularizes the mRNA and facilitates formation of the initiation complex
  • Mechanism to ensure that only intact mRNA is translated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Direct effects on cellular translation factors during virus infection

A
  • rotavirus NSP3 protein disrupts the PABP–eIF4G association
  • Enteroviral, apthoviral, caliciviral, and retroviral proteases cleave the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP)
  • Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), influenza virus, and adenovirus (Ad) decrease eIF4E phosphorylation
  • Ad 100K protein displaces the kinase Mnk1, resulting in the accumulation of unphosphorylated eIF4E late in infection, stimulating selective late viral mRNA translation
  • Cleavage of eIF4G by viral proteases, separating its (amino- terminal) eIF4E-interacting domain from its eIF4A- and eIF3- binding segment
  • enterovirus 71 infection induces host micro-RNA (miRNA) miR-141 expression: reduction of eIF4E abundance
  • Measles, rabies viruses impair cap-dependent translation via virus-encoded eIF3-interacting proteins
17
Q

Inhibition of translation

A
  • missing 5‘cap-structure
    -strong RNA secondary structure in 5 ́NTR
    (mRNAs with less or no secondary structure have a lower need for eIF4A helicase activity- for example during Alfalfa mosaic virus segment 4 translation)
  • long 5 ́NTR
  • upstream AUG and open reading frames
  • poor sequence context of the AUG codon (Kozak rule)
    optimal: GCCACCAUGG
    (only 5% of eukaryotic mRNAs have optimal sequence context around the initiator AUG- translatability contributes to appropriate protein levels in the cell)
18
Q

Inhibition of host cell protein synthesis in Poliovirus infected Cells

A
  • Complete shut off of cap-dependent translation of host cell mRNAs in cell infected with Poliovirus
  • Poliovirus genomic RNA is efficiently translated under these conditions

molecular basis:
cleavage of eIF4G by Poliovirus encoded protease 2A

cap-independent translation of Poliovirus RNA
- IRES-mediated
- efficient translation after eIF4G cleavage
- use of the C-terminal cleavage product

19
Q

Translation of Poliovirus ORF (PV)

A
  • (+)-strand-RNA,
  • no cap, 5‘ end linked to VPg protein
  • long 5‘NTR
  • extensive secondary structure of the 5‘end of the viral RNA - 7 AUG codons located in the 5‘NTR

In Poliovirus-infected cells:
- Efficient translation of PV RNA despite the inhibition of host cell translation by the virus (eIF4G cleavage)
Conclusion:
- 5‘-end-dependent initiation of translation with scanning to the initiator AUG are highly unlikely

  • ORF B translation is dependent of (functional) IRES element upstream of ORF B -> circular RNA to demonstrate internal initiation of translation
20
Q

IRES-mediated translation

A

IRES-mediated translation also makes use of general eukaryotic translation initiation factors
viral IRES elements can be separated in 4 different groups
- each IRES type has different requirements for translation initiation factors

21
Q

The IRES groups also diverge in relation to the position of the authentic initiator AUG codon

A
  • cardiovirus-aphthovirus IRES group and HAV: initiation of translation from the AUG codon at the immediate 3’ boundary of the IRES
  • enteroviruses and rhinoviruses: initiate translation from an AUG codon located approx. 40 and 160 nt downstream from the 3’ IRES boundary – Scanning!!
  • HCV: actual site of translation initiation resides approx. 40 nt upstream to the 3’ IRES boundary
22
Q

Methionine-independent initiation of translation

A
  • can assemble 80S ribosomes without any eIFs or Met-tRNAi
  • RNA mimics tRNAi
  • The turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) contains a tRNA-like structural element that recruits ribosomes and places the translation factors proximal to the 5’ initiation site.
23
Q

IRES-types in viruses

A

Typ II/EMCV (translations initiation factors: eIF4G-Ct, eIF4A, eIF3, eIF2/ assess. factors: PTB)
Typ III/HCV (eIF3, eIF2/PTB, PCBP2, La protein)
Typ IV/CrPV (none/protein 25 of small ribosomal subunit (RPS25), common to all IRES elements)

Conclusion:
- certain IRES elements are active in their tissue/cell-type of choice
- tissue-specific and selective gene expression

24
Q

Viral IRESes

A
  • Picornaviruses
  • Flaviviruses (hepatitis C virus<)
  • Pestiviruses (bovine viral diarrhea virus, classical swine fever virus)
  • Retroviruses (SIV, MMLV, HTLV, FLV)
  • Insect picorna-like viruses (cricket paralysis virus, Plautia stall intestine virus)
25
Q

Cellular IRESes

A
  • BiP
  • c-Myc
  • Antennapaedia
  • Ornithine decarboxylase
  • Fibroblast growth factor
  • Vascular endothelial growth factor
  • protein kinase p58PITSLRE
26
Q

Mechanism of Cellular IRES-Directed Translation Initiation: Involvement of Canonical Initiation Factors

A
  • Cap-dependent initiation is believed to require all canonical initiation factors and involve circularization of the mRNA via interaction of PABP with eIF4G.
  • Cellular IRES-mediated translation generally does not require the cap-binding protein eIF4E and/or intact eIF4G, but may involve circularization of the mRNA
  • The requirement for canonical initiation factors and ITAFs can vary between different IRES-containing mRNAs.
27
Q

Recruitment of 40S ribosome subunits to viral mRNAs: structural features and initiation factor targets

A
  • Calicivirus VPg interacts with eIF4E or eIF3 to mediate ribosome recruitment to viral mRNAs;
  • Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) VPg binds eEF1A and concentrates it in membrane-associated viral replication sites
  • Both class I and class II IRESs interact with the carboxy-terminal half of eIF4G
  • Infection of viruses with class I IRES does involve eIF4G cleavage
  • Infection of viruses with class II IRES does not involve eIF4G cleavage (EMCV)
  • HAV IRES is unusual because it uses intact eIF4F. The eIF4E cap- binding slot is unoccupied, rendering HAV IRES initiation cap- independent.
  • Class III IRES function uses eIF3 and eIF2 to recruit 40S ribosmal subunit
  • class IV IRESs of the Dicistroviridae, including CrPV, recruit 40S subunits, assemble 80S ribosomes, and direct initiation in the absence of any eIFs and even of the initiator Met-tRNAi, requiring only eEFs for polypeptide chain formation
  • Plant viruses contain cis-acting cap-independent translational elements (CITEs) in their 3’ UTRs that interact with the 5’ UTR, bind translation factors, and place them proximal to the 5’ initiation site.
28
Q

Application of bicistronic expression vectors in biomedical research

A
  • Coupled expression of two genes driven by one promoter e.g.: Gene + Resistance gene (NeoR)
    Gene + Marker (FLAG)
  • Selection of second-site mutations to study protein-protein interaction during virus replication
29
Q

Polyprotein processing

A
  • Strategy for producing multiple proteins from a single mRNA
  • resulting polyprotein is proteolytically processed
    Advantage:
  • gene expression can be controlled by the rate and extent of polyprotein processing
  • alternative utilization of cleavage sites can produce proteins with different activity
30
Q

Viral translation strategies
-> Polyprotein synthesis

A

Picornaviruses: entire (+) sense RNA genome is translated into a single large polyprotein. Processing is carried out by two virus encoded proteases 2Apro and 3Cpro.

Flaviviruses: RNA genome is translated into a polyprotein precursor processed by viral proteases and by host signal peptidases.

Potyvirus group of plant viruses: Potato virus Y and tobacco etch virus contain a (+) sense genome RNA of around 10,000 bases which has a single open reading frame. This polyprotein is processed by viral encoded proteases.

31
Q

Pestiviral genome organization
-> Hallmarks

A
  • Degree of NS2-3 cleavage is strain-specific; determined biotype
  • NS3 is essential for replication
  • uncleaved NS2-3 essential for virion assembly
  • NS2 autoprotease is activated by a cellular chaperon DNAJC14/Jiv
32
Q

HCV Polyprotein processing by cellular and viral proteases

A
  • HCV encodes a polyprotein which is processed by cellular and viral proteases
  • Cleavage between NS2 and NS3 is catalyzed by an autoprotease in NS2
  • Uncleaved NS2-3 can not be detected in cell culture and is not essential for viron morphogenesis
  • The remainder of the cleavage sites in the HCV NS region are processed by a serine protease in NS3 and its cofactor NS4A
33
Q

Comparison of genome organization of the genera Pesti- and Hepacivirus (HCV)

A

order of cleavage events is different :
for Pestiviruses: precursor protein 4AB and 5AB
in the case of HCV: stable precursor protein 4B-5A, but little 4AB and 5AB

34
Q

NS2-3 cleavage is a prerequisite for functional viral replicase assembly by free NS3

A

Proposed NS2 dimer-NS3pro pre-cleavage complex + hydrophobic NS3 surface patch stimulates NS2-NS3 cleavage by the NS2 protease
-> NS2-3 cleavage ->
assembly of the viral replication complex (RC) on the surface of NS3 involving L127
-> assembled RCs allow for NS5A hyperphosphorylation
-> RNA Replication

35
Q

FMDV 2A
Autoproteolysis or disrupted peptide synthesis?

A

Three explanations may account for a co-translational cleavage associated with such a short sequence:
I) FMDV 2A functions as a substrate for a cellular proteinase, which, would need to be closely coupled to translation
II) the FMDV 2A sequence in some manner disrupts the normal peptide bond formation during translation
III) the FMDV 2A sequence possesses an entirely novel type of proteolytic activity

36
Q

Mechanism of FMDV 2A/2B processing

A

(i) Addition of the ultimate 2A- residue
* Peptidyl-2A-tRNA is translocated to the P-site
* Ingress of prolyl-tRNA
* Prolyl-tRNA is unable to attack the peptidyl-2A-tRNA ester linkage
* Hydrolysis of the glycyl-tRNA ester bond and nascent peptide release
* Translocation of prolyl-tRNA to P site. Synthesis of the remaining peptide C- terminal of 2A would proceed as normal.