Gene Cloning and Plasmid Vectors Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is gene cloning?

A
  • In vivo method to amplify DNA fragments, creating copies of a specific DNA sequence in large (µg-scale) quantities
  • In addition to producing specific DNA molecules/fragments in large quantities it also facilitates modification of these DNA molecules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does gene cloning apply to?

A
  • Generation of DNA probes
  • Detection of presence/absence of particular genes or mutations
  • Production of recombinant proteins (expression cloning)
  • DNA sequencing (Sanger method)
  • Investigate genetically engineered sequences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cloning Vectors for E. coli

A
  • Vector (an entity that transports something): plasmid vectors can carry recombinant genetic material into a cell
  • E.coli is one of the most widely used organisms used for cloning: wide variety of DNA delivery vectors are available for the replication of DNA in E.coli
  • They are based on 2 naturally occurring replicons: plasmids, bacteriophages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Plasmids

A
  • Double-stranded circular supercoiled DNA molecules
  • Naturally occurring plasmids are often genetically mobile: genes typically encode non-essential functions, can propagate in more than one bacterial strain, i.e. they enable horizontal gene transfer, allow e.g. antibiotic resistance to spread among multiple species
  • Artificial/engineered plasmids used in molecular cloning are typically specific to E. coli and carry a selective marker such as antibiotic resistance
  • Capable of autonomous replication: multiple copies/E. coli cell, contain an origin of replication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Introduction of Plasmid DNA into E. coli

A
  • Introduction of recombinant DNA into a host: transfection or transformation
  • A cell/organism that can be transformed is competent
  • Natural competence exists; disadvantage: naturally competent organisms are genetically unstable, undesirable for cloning
  • E. coli isn’t naturally competent, but can be transformed ‘by force’
  • Main methods of transformation for E. coli: heat shock, electroporation
  • Both methods rely on temporarily making E.coli cell membrane more porous, allow plasmid DNA to enter the cell
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

General Transformation Procedure for E. coli

A
  • heat shock or electroporation
  • recover: methods of transformation are stressful to cell, need for recovery in rich growth medium
  • transfer to selective growth medium (agar plates)
  • overnight growth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Production of Competent E. coli

A
  • Grow E. coli cells in liquid culture to mid-exponential growth phase: growth at lower temps (20-25oC instead of 37oC) is thought to result in higher competency, most likely due to altered membrane composition
  • Cool cells by placing the culture flask on ice prior to ‘competency enhancing procedure’
  • Competent cells can stored for several months at -80oC, provided they were immediately flash frozen (liquid N2) after production
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Transformation of E. coli: Heat shock

A
  • Actual transformation is triggered by incubating for a short period (30-60s) at 42oC
  • Increased temperature is expected to temporarily make the membrane more permeable/lower membrane potential
  • Possibly entry via Bayer’s junction on inner/outer membrane
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How are cells ‘made’ chemically competent?

A
  • by treatment with several chemicals or combinations thereof: divalent metal ions (e.g. Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+), polyethylene glycol (PEG), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
  • All ingredients are thought to either concentrate DNA on the cell surface (divalent metal ions, PEG) or make the cell membrane more porous (DMSO, divalent metal ions)
  • Early methods mainly used CaCl2: CaCl2-competent cells has become almost synonymous with chemically competent cells/heat shock treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Transformation of E. coli: Electroporation

A
  • Method: discharge of high voltage over a short distance temporarily causes the formation of membrane pores
  • Preparation of electrocompetent E. coli involves repeated washing of cells with ultrapure H2O containing 10% (v/v) glycerol
  • Repeated washing done to remove salts
  • Preparation procedure has no direct influence on competency, electroshock is what causes the competency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Origin of replication (Plasmid Cloning Vectors: Minimal Requirements)

A
  • confers the ability to propagate/replicate independent from chromosomal DNA
  • type of ori strongly influences number of copies/cell (copy number)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Copu number

A
  • the average or expected number of copies per host cell
  • Plasmids are either low, medium or high copy number
    copy number depends on three main factors: oriand its constituents – ColE1 RNA I and RNA II; size of plasmid and its associated insert, larger inserts and plasmids may be replicated at a lower number as they represent a greater metabolic burden for the cell; culture conditions: factors that influence the metabolic burden on the host.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of high-copy number

A
  • Increased yield from protein overexpression

- Cloning:Using a high-copy plasmid will generally result in greater yields from plasmid preps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advantages of lower copy number

A
  • Expression of ‘toxic’ protein product: a low-copy might be better to minimise toxic effects/energetic burden from protein expression
  • Expression to simulate ‘natural’ conditions for in vivo experiments: artificially high protein expression/RNA transcription may give rise to artifacts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Selectable marker as minimal requirement for plasmid cloning vectors

A
  • Coding for phenotypic traits e.g. antibiotic resistance (AmpR) or colour change in presence of medium components
  • Transformants must be distinguishable from non-transformants
  • Non-transformed bacteria have no vector (plasmid or phage) so cannot grow on media with antibiotic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Multiple cloning site (MCS) as minimal requirement for plasmid cloning vectors

A
  • Single region for large number of different, preferably unique restriction endonuclease recognition sites
  • Restriction enzyme digestion results in linearisation of plasmid vector rather than fragmentation into several fragments
  • Enables restriction fragments produced by numerous restriction enzymes to be cloned
17
Q

Plasmid Cloning Vectors: Smaller is Better

A
  • Transformation efficiency decreases with increasing plasmid size
  • Reduction in number of restriction sites outside the intended ligation site
  • Lower metabolic burden for plasmid propagation, i.e. replication of DNA costs energy
  • Typically higher copy number
  • Easier to purify
  • Less prone to fragmentation due to shearing
18
Q

pBR322

A
  • One of the first vectors to be developed
  • comparatively small in size - 4361bp
  • Reasonably low copy number ~15
  • contains 2 Antibiotic resistance genes (AmpR + TcR): each resistance gene contains unique restriction sites allowing non-recombinants to be distinguished from recombinants (insertion of DNA fragments in one of the respective resistance genes will abolish antibiotic resistance)
19
Q

pUC Series Vectors

A
  • Derived from pBR322 although only the AmpR gene and ori remain
  • Contains a proper multiple cloning site
  • High copy number (500-700)
  • Multiple cloning site located in the LacZa fragment which complements b-galactosidase
    blue/white screening
20
Q

pZErO-2

A
  • Contains the lethal E. coli gene, ccdB
  • Acts by poisoning bacterial DNA-gyrase (topoisomerase II)
    Prevents the unwinding of DNA
21
Q

Testing for Insert: Colony PCR

A
  • Marker to screen/select for successful fragment insertion not always possible (typically absent in plasmids designed for protein overexpression)
  • Colony PCR with flanking primers can be used: many plasmids have binding sites for sequencing primers on either side of MCS that can be used as primer pair for a PCR reaction
22
Q

Host – Vector Choice

A
  • Ease of cloning into MCS: are optimal sites for digesting your insert compatible with the MCS etc.
  • Propagating in the correct/optimal host (copy number, ori): expression in non-standard bacteria may be facilitated by use of shuttle vectors, i.e. vectors that can propagate in e.g. E. coli and the non-standard bacterium to take advantage of the easy of DNA manipulation in E. coli
  • Stability of produced DNA after purification: E.coli genotype endA1 doesn’t have Endonuclease I activity, less risk of DNA degradation while stored
  • Correct machinery for protein expression
23
Q

Using PCR to Introduce Cloning Handles

A
  • PCR can be used to introduce extra bases via extensions beyond target DNA sequence introduced at the 5’-end of both forward (F) and reverse (R) primers
  • This extra bit of sequence can be used to introduce cloning handles such as restriction sites or overlapping regions for Gibson Assembly
24
Q

General cloning strategy

A
  • DNA clean-up or gel extraction to remove restriction enzymes and unwanted fragments from plasmid
  • target gene added
  • joined by DNA ligase
  • forms recombinant plasmid
  • Transformation
    (DNA clean-up prior to transformation optional)
25
Q

Gibson Assembly - Principle

A
  • dsDNA fragments with overlapping ends
  • Gibson Assembly Master Mix (5’-exonuclease, DNA polymerase, DNA ligase)
  • 50oC for 1 hour
  • Fully assembled DNA fragment
26
Q

Gibson Assembly - Mechanism

A
  • 5’-exonuclease digests only a single strand from the 5’-end
  • DNA fragments anneal
  • DNA polymerase extends 3’ ends
  • DNA ligase seals nicks
  • Overlapping ends can be generated by including overlapping extensions in e.g. PCR primers
27
Q

Site-directed mutagenesis using Gibson Assembly

A
  • Perform two separate PCR reactions (A and B) to introduce a mutation into a fixed position in the gene using a sense (mS) and anti-sense (mAS) mutagenic primer
  • Combine PCR products A and B with relevant Gibson assembly compatible vector all in a single reaction
28
Q

Requirement for Cloning Procedures: Pure DNA

A
  • DNA needs to be ‘pure’ in order to be able to manipulate in vitro
  • Preparative restriction digest of PCR products: high salt, exonuclease activity of the thermostable DNA polymerase
  • Transformation of Ligation reactions: high salt can interfere with effective transformation to E. coli, in particular electroporation
  • Purity: interference of contaminants during the measurement of DNA concentration by UV/VIS spectroscopy prevents accurate determination
  • In particular digests and some PCR reactions can result in multiple DNA molecules, only one of which is desired and the other fragments may interfere with follow-up reaction
29
Q

DNA Purification for Cloning: Size/Type of Molecule

A
  • Purification of a DNA fragment of a particular size from other nucleic acids
  • MiniPrep: Selectively purifies plasmid DNA and removes RNA and chromosomal DNA
  • Separation of DNA fragments of a particular size using agarose gel electrophoresis followed by subsequent excision of the desired fragment from the agarose gel
30
Q

Plasmid purification from bacterial cell culture

A
  • Generally known as ‘MiniPrep’, can be purchased as a complete kit
  • Many suppliers using similar protocols
  • Selectively purifies plasmid DNA from genomic DNA
31
Q

Protocol/method of plasmid purification

A
  • Grow cell culture with bacteria propagating plasmid DNA overnight and harvest cells by centrifugation
  • Lyse the cells (detergent) + removal of RNA (RNAse added)
  • Neutralize (Proteins precipitate) and centrifuge
  • Apply supernatant to column, only plasmid DNA binds
  • Wash to remove contaminants
  • Elute into Ultrapure H2O or slightly basic (pH 8.5) very low strength buffer (e.g. 1 mM Tris)
32
Q

PCR/Restriction Digest/Ligase DNA purification

A
  • Generally known as ‘PCR purification kit’ or ‘DNA clean up kit’
  • Many suppliers using similar protocols
33
Q

Protocol/method of PCR/Restriction Digest/Ligase DNA purification

A
  • Dilute reaction mixture (PCR, DNA digest etc..) in DNA binding buffer and apply to column, DNA binds
  • Wash to remove buffer components, enzymes (DNA polymerases, Restriction endonucleass, Ligase) and small DNA fragments (Primers, small fragments that occur after digests etc..)
  • Elute into Ultrapure H2O or slightly basic (pH 8.5) very low strength buffer (e.g. 1 mM Tris)
34
Q

Protocol/method of gel extraction kit

A
  • Excise DNA fragment from agarose gel (if high % (>2% w/v agarose) so-called ‘low melting point’ agarose is used)
  • Mix gel slice with gel dissolving buffer and heat to dissolve agarose
  • Apply mix to column, DNA binds
  • Wash to remove buffer components and residual agarose
  • Elute into Ultrapure H2O or slightly basic (pH 8.5) very low strength buffer (e.g. 1 mM Tris)
  • Many companies sell the dissolving buffer as an add-on to their regular DNA clean-up kit (i.e. columns are identical)
35
Q

UV/VIS analysis

A
  • Nucleic acids have an absorbance maximum at 260 nm, whereas protein contaminants have their maximum at 280 nm
  • Increased Absorbance at 230 nm can be caused by proteins and/or other contaminants
  • Ratio between A260/A230 and A260/A280 used as indicators for DNA purity and should be in between 1.8-2.0
  • Conversion factor A260 to DNA concentration: A260 = 1 corresponds to [dsDNA] = 50 ng mL-1 (if pathlength = 1 cm)
  • This analysis does not inform on the homogeneity of the size of the DNA fragments
36
Q

Gel electrophoresis

A
  • Separation of nucleic acids based on differences in size and shape
  • Quantification of individual bands is possible (based on the amounts given for the marker), allowing for estimates as to which fragments are dominant in a mixture
  • Quality control of samples expected to contain a DNA fragment/molecule of a particular length
  • Destructive as an analytical method: the sample is lost after the analysis