Gendered Environments Flashcards
3 main purposes of ecofeminism
- It interrogates the traditional cultural-conceptual association of woman and nature (e.g. mother nature)
- It observes that woman and nature have both traditionally been treated as objects of subjugation and control and studies their mutual domination
- It asks how the domination of woman and nature can be overcome
Answer 1 to overcoming domination: Feminism of uncritical reversal - 3 points
- Solution is to accept and celebrate woman-nature association
- Woman-nature understood in opposition to man-culture, but hierarchy should be reversed
- Woman-nature’s shared, special talents for reproduction, cultivation, and care should be esteemed and revered more than man-culture
2 general critiques of feminism of uncritical reversal
- It essentializes women as only nurturers and cultivators despite no innate link between woman and nature
- Naturalizes a narrow, traditional vision of who and what women are, and what they can do, leading to naturalize “a woman’s place is in the home” -> reinforcing oppression
Plumwood’s critique of feminism of uncritical reversal - 4 arguments
- Dualisms always incite domination because they define a dominant concept in terms of its non-identity to a subordinate concept; they are often stacked (woman-nature-animal-other); and operate through hierarchical exclusion (valuing one because it has no resemblance to the other)
- This distorts the image of men and women, who have many similarities
- Swapping roles of dominator and dominated isn’t genuine liberation
- Must get over dualism to overcome domination
Overcoming domination: Feminism of uncritical equality
Equate woman and man under category of ‘human’, thereby liberating woman by moving her over to the side of man (human-culture-self vs. animal-nature-other)
Plumwood’s critique of feminism of uncritical equality - 2 points
- Still maintains dualism, so also maintains domination and distortion
- Nature remains subordinate, now dominated by woman and man together -> freeing woman while continuing to dominate nature isn’t genuine liberation
Overcoming domination: Plumwood: Critical ecological feminism
Humanity must be reimagined as continuous with nature, conceptualized on the same spectrum of continuity
What 3 advantages does critical ecological feminism have, according to Plumwood?
- Doesn’t distort humanity or nature by claiming they are opposites
- Breaks down hierarchy between human and nature - if we’re continuous with nature, we cannot also be its master, thus removing need to dominate it
- Proximity to nature no longer means distance from humanity, e.g. woman (and man) can be close to nature and still fully human