Gender Legal Theories Flashcards
general opening quote - Simone De Beavoir + history
‘one is not born but rather becomes a woman’ - subjects of law have been historically male orientated and thus gendered in this way (i.e tort law = “reasonable person” generally referred to as white able bodied male)
This idea of gendered legal conduct can be seen in the use of sexual history evidence concerning rape; undermines credibility of victim/witnesses by using past evidence of similar (uniquely) sexual events to justify D’s assumption as “reasonable”.
General intro on what gender theories have aimed to do + example of where they have positively impacted an area (chapkis quote)
expanding gender theories have attempted to redefine acts previously condoned & manipulated by patriarchal structures in a way that encompasses the universality, equality and social justice that our current legal framework fails to do.
e.g. Chapkis: describes prostitution as “a potent symbolic challenge to the confining notions of womanhood and conventional sexuality” = elevates prostitution from the “sub-human” class it was assigned, as a means of justifying acts of sexual violence against women and provides the recognition of its validity as a legitimate form of work in recently that should be regulated. (e.g. beginnings of such leniency can be seen in legalised red light district of Holbeck)
Liberal Feminism (MacKinnon quote + background of lib fem)
women excluded from public discourse/institutions largely because men set standards of entry and presumed domesticated life for women.
BUT, lib fem provided strong political platform/inspirational mentality = “anything men can do women can do” - MacKinnon
examples of historical movement in Liberal Feminism + example of other topics it has impacted
suffragettes movement’ similarities of men and women to secure the vote, higher education and inclusion in workplace
e.g. can be seen in legal profession with 42% trainees entering profession and over 50% studying law.
BUT, only 24% partners = glass ceiling allowed entry into male sphere but not defining that sphere.
problem with liberal feminism: extending franchise
extending franchise to women has not led to equal political representation of them:
- 6% in European parliament
- 6% in house of commons
not clear increase of women in political sphere has created more female friendly policies/laws = idea of playing male.
problem with liberal feminism: individualistic
obscures general trend in society (i.e. women likely to be subject to sexual violence and obscures clearly social and cultural pressures present) -
e.g. highest morbidity rate for women 19-44 is domestic violence and further affected by social/cultural pressures across women = BME women victims less likely to seek legal help; 9 out of 10 survivors preferring support from specialist refugee services that understand their needs)
problem with liberal feminism: expectations of woman hood
expectation of women to leave work to care for child and being given more gov. money/leave than men encourage this
BUT, equality and human rights commission outlines strategy to improve pay imbalances between men and women = all jobs to be advertised with flexible working hours and giving fathers additional paternity leave
problems with liberal feminism: negative freedom + gidden quote
idea of laisse faire whereby lib fems see freedom as something that can be established amongst people themselves, but this has historically led to public/private divide and consequences include high rates of Domestic violence (1 in 4)
“the home is in fact the most dangerous place in society” - Gidden
Liberal Feminism problem: same v difference debate
lib fems see men and women as same and so treats them the same
but just formally opening laws up to women and throwing them into the mix does not necessarily lead to substantive equality (i.e. equal pay BME women; 13% solicitors, 16% barristers, 24% admission to law)
Problems with Liberal Feminism: formal equality v Substantive equality (prostitution example)
lib fems see prostitution as redefining concept of womanhood and so valuable asset in restructuring societal attitudes between men and women.
BUT, regulating such work and decriminalising it may only provide a formal equality because of present structural inequalities between men and women
(survey: 59% think prostitution is a reasonable choice to have - but fails to protect sex workers from all serious harms as a result of very inevitability of prostitution (80% think it exploits them))
inevitability includes economic restraints influencing women’s entry into jobs, including reduced labour market options and need for flexible working hours to accommodate women’s working practices are alike those shaping entry of many women into sex work.
problem with liberal feminism quote (young)
assimilating women into an unchanged male sphere is like “coming into a game after the rules have been set, already begun and having to prove oneself according to these rules and standards”
Cultural/relational feminism: what is it? (gilligan)
focus on difference between men and women - Carol Gilligan found young boys and girls approach dilemmas requiring moral reasoning in different ways:
Boys = ethics of justice
Girls = ethics of care
female moral reasoning different but not deficiant
positive of C/R feminism - Rhodes
research of Gilligan recognises values associated with women and demands “these values be valued”
positive of C/R feminism - its objective
objective = inclusion; celebrate women’s difference/experiences and bring reform accordingly in context of work, family and politics
problem with C/R feminism - essentialism/all women same (plus positive in response)
empirical merits that all women are different may not reflect all women - study from a small unrepresentative sample
BUT, still good grounds to suspect that women will, on the whole, experience and reason differently to men and if patriarchal society been grounded on a way not all men possibly think then surely bringing in consequences of how women reason will help equalize society/law
positive of C/R feminism = where essentialism is good (prostitution - Gruz quote)
useful in drafting regulations on prostitution - “formal inclusion is no guarantee of protection” - Gruz
embrace of ethics of care could allow for women’s experiences to influence regulation/protection of sex workers and how regulation is implemented.
problem with C/R feminism (ethic of care = internalised gender stereotypes)
these difference may be a consequence of internalised gender stereotype that have contributed to women’s disadvantage. - so relational approach risks affirming that which has distinguished women from men and used to justify subordination into private sphere (and see legal profession job sectors)
Dominance/Radical feminism MacKinnon quote + overview of theory
“difference is the velvet glove on the iron fist of domination” - domination established first, gender differences subsequently constructed as significant to justify/maintain patriarchal power.
question of whether female differences are affirmed/denied is irrelevant = those differences are defined by power - inequality no longer blips in an otherwise legitimate system but part of pervasive network that infiltrates every aspect of our gendered existence