Abortion Law Flashcards
Feminist perspectives on abortion (pro-choice)
more reproductive freedom that abortion - women have a right to self determination, privacy and bodily autonomy and integrity.
not allowing abortion violates these rights.
rejects notion of competition between value of feotus & rights of women - rights of feotus is relational rather than absolute; value people for personality not mere existence
Borgman quote on abortion in law
‘moral aspect of abortion that we should see codified in law is a woman’s dignity and autonomy in making their own decisions about fate of her pregnancy and thereby her life’
Feminist perspectives on abortion (pro-choice; invasion of woman’s body) - Thompson
‘having a right to life does not guarantee having either a right to be given the use of or right to be allowed continued use of another body’
Feminist perspectives on abortion (pro-life)
supports anti-motherhood - views abortion as making women’s bodies as a tool of oppression for men; a reusable sex object.
“now you too can walk away from your responsibilities” - lowering women’s standards to a masculine viewpoint of a wombless male world.
UK right to abortion (SHELDON)
victorious in the legal right to abortion but not moral = essentially decriminalization and whole freedom of reproductive choice for women)
but Sheldon argued ‘british abortion laws cannot be considered liberal legislation’
Williams quote on balancing feminist abortion/anti-abortion
‘for all but most extremist anti-abortionists. The more arresting question is not whether a woman has a right to choose, but rather what appropriate limits or scope this right might be’
Abortion as crime legislation (OAPA 1861)
offences against persons act 1861, S.58; administering drugs or using instruments to procure abortion
S.59 prohibits supply of instruments with knowledge of what such objects were going to be used for
Abortion as crime case: R v Catt
mother aborted baby 1 week before due date - charged with murder - 8 years imprisonment
Abortion as crime case: R v Bourne (N. Irish case)
D gave abortion to 14 year old rape victim - court decided hadn’t acted unlawfully if acted in good faith to save girl’s life (i.e. preventing someone from becoming a mental/physical wreck) - D noted wanted all abortions to be legal in this respect, but would not have carried out abortion if been of prostitute mind (moral right not present)
Abortion as crime: infant life preservation act 1929 S.1
punishment for child destruction - killing unlawfully a child/feotus capable of being person (if feotus past 28 weeks used as evidence of potential life)
Infant life preservation act 1929 case examples - Carl Whant
raped and stabbed 19 year old to death, killing daughter due to be born in 2 weeks, given life imprisonment (judge emphasised name given to feotus and closeness to birth)
problem with removing abortion law on criminal convictions
if decrim, how would we measure feotus capability of being a person? mother can abort at 28 weeks then debatable what kind of criminal justice will prevail for pregnant women losing feotus to a crime. - may require courts to look deeper into intention of mother to keep child (i.e. medical reports, scans, purchasing of supplies)
legal status of feotus: St Georges NHS Trust v S
academic commentary
36 week feotus ‘not nothing, not lifeless and it is certainly human’ - feotus protected by law but does not have right that can be enforced by other people.
Paton: not possible to bring proceedings in name of feotus.
Art. 2 ECHR (right to life)
feotus is not protected under this article as outlined in Vo v France
Current Abortion Law (historical background)
unsafe back street abortions - “class clash” middle class women having safer abortions than working class.
1966; estimated 100,000 to 250,000 illegal abortions per year. - high number of women exposed to potential health risks pursuing abortions
rise of women’s rights in 60s: debates on equality and access to workplace beyond childbearing capacity and thalomide/german measles outbreak led to discussion of abortion where feotus is disabled/severly affected by disease.
Grounds for abortion - abortion act 1967
doesn’t provide right to abortion - made clear in drafting not a liberal free for all act. S.1 pregnancy not exceeded 24 weeks.
S.1(a) is classed as social ground and is most commonly used = continuance of pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if it were terminated, of injury to physical/ mental health of pregnant woman or existing children of her family.
S.1(d) is also important in determining removal of abortion act (disability ground) = substantial risk that if child born it would suffer from physical/mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.
Abortion act 1967 S.2 & S.4
may take into account woman’s actual/foreseeable environment and need for 2 medical practitioners may be discounted if termination seen as immediately necessary to prevent permanent injury to physical/mental health of woman. (S.2)
BUT, under no legal duty to participate in treatment except if necessary to save life/prevent personal injury (S.4)