Gender Identity Flashcards
Parsons (1950s) FUNCTIONALIST
developed the concept of sex-role differentiation, went some way in supporting the biological determinist argument. Suggests genders are socialised into taking on different roles. men = instrumental, women = expressive
Stanley and Wise (2002)
says gender is socially constructed. they argue biological makeup (male/female) amy not lead to masculine/ feminine behaviours, such as aggression or caring
Blackman (1995) FEMALES
lower middle class and working class New Wave Girls in a secondary school were a highly visible group. They used their sexuality to challenge male culture, subordinate/ passive identity and the traditional ways girls should behave e.g. being quite, demure and submissive.
Jackson (2006b) FEMALES
study on Lads and Ladettes, describes normative femininity (the view that there is a socially acceptable way for women and girls to dress and act).
McRobbie (2007) FEMALES
suggests that some aspects of female subcultural behaviour is more rage against than resistance to the current expectations placed upon girls.
Archer (2003a) MALES
suggests to talk of one homogenous hegemonic masculinity hides the range of experiences and behaviours of what it means to be a ‘man’ in the contemporary UK.
Nayak (2006) MALES
argues that in the 1950s and 1960s working class males had ‘body capital’, seen as male breadwinners, did hard physical jobs and as a result were able to opt out of domestic duties
Willis (1977) MALES
group of 12 lads ‘learning to labour’, for them school was a place to ‘have a law’, doing as little work as possible and disrupting lessons.
Jackson (2006) MALES
the reason for the adoption of the laddish behaviour in her study was down to fear of academic failure resulting in defensive laddish behaviour.
Burdsey (2004) MALES
research on young Asain footballers, found ‘fitting in’ was important in deciding when they would ‘drop’ and hide their Asian identity.
Connell MALES
Apart form normative and hegemonic masculinity, identifies 3 others:
- complicit masculinity = new men, shared role in family
- marginalised masculinity = changing nature of labour market over last 40 years lead to, sense of loss of manual work, unemployed
- subordinate masculinity = gay men behaving differently to expectations of dominant hegemonic masculinity.
Seidler (2006)
argues young males growing up in the 1950s knew what it meant to be male. They would do what their parents did, get married, have children and follow their fathers footsteps.
Oakley (1970s) - Family
Gender shaped by:
- verbal appellations = ‘brave little solider’, ‘little princess’
- different activities/ accepted behaviours = boys don’t cry
- canalisation of media = Bratz dolls directed at girls, Bob the Builder/ cars directed at boys
- manipulation = clothes given by parents, girls in dresses/ ribbons/ handbags, boys in waistcoats/ superhero coats/ guns
Mitchell and Green (2002) - Family
found evidence of mother- daughter bond being strong in WC women they interviewed, especially after the daughter had a baby.
Frosh et al. (2002) - Family
found when boys talked about their parents they described their mothers as sensitive and emotionally closer than their more distanced and detached fathers.