gender differences in achievement Flashcards
The gender gap in achievement:
what is the gender gap in achievement (use sociologists)
2013- teacher assessments of pupils at the end of Yr1 showed girls ahead of boys by 7-17% in literacy, language, maths, personal, social and emotional development.
Department of Education (2013)-
At AS and A-level girls get higher grades than boys e.g 46.8% of girls gained A or B grades at A-level, but only 42.2% of boys.
On vocational courses a larger proportion of girls achieve distinctions in all subjects including engineering and construction where girls are a tiny minority of the students.
Gender differences in achievement:
how has the impact of feminism affect girls achievement (use sociologists)
EXTERNAL FACTOR
McRobbie’s (1994) study of girls’ magazines. In the 1970s, they emphasised the importance of getting married and not being ‘left on the shelf’, whereas nowadays, they contain images of assertive, independent women.
these changes encourage girls to try harder at school to be like the people who they see in the magazines.
Gender differences in achievement:
how has the impact on changes in the family impact girls achievement (use sociologist)
EXTERNAL FACTOR
An increase in the divorce rate, an increase in cohabitation and a decrease in the number in first marriages, an increase in the number of lone parent families
smaller families all lead to girls achieving more.
An increased number of female-headed lone parent families may mean more women need to take on the bread winner role. This creates a new role model for girls to be the the financial independent women. To achieve this independence women need well paid jobs and therefore need good qualifications.
An increase in the divorce rate may suggest to girls that it is unwise to solely rely in a husband to be their sole provider. This encourages girls to look at themselves and their own qualifications to make a living.
Gender differences in achievement:
how does women’s change in employment impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
EXTERNAL FACTOR
Equal Pay Act (1970) this makes it illegal to pay women less than men for work of the equal value
The Sex Discrimination Act (1975) - means that women aren’t allowed to be discriminated against because they are a woman. (outlaws discrimination at work) e.g since 1975, the pay gap between men and women has halved from 30%-15%
The proportion of women in employment has risen from 53% in 1971 to 67% in 2013. The growth of the service sector and flexibility part time work has offered opportunities for women
These changes have encouraged girls to see their future in terms of paid wok rather as housewives. Greater career opportunities and better pay for women and the role model that successful career women offer provide incentives for girls to gain qualifications
Some women are no breaking through the ‘glass ceiling- the invisible barrier that keeps them from out of high professional and managerial jobs.
Gender differences in achievement:
how have girls changes in ambition impacted girls achievement (use sociologists)
EXTERNAL FACTOR
Sue Sharpe’s (1994) interviews with girls in the 1970s and the 1990s show a major shift in the way that furls see their future.
In 1970s, the girls had low aspirations they believed educational success was unfeminine and that appearing to ambitious would be considered to be unattractive. By the 1990s, the girls ambitions had changed and Sharpe found that girl were more likely to see their future as an independent woman with a career rather than as a dependent on their husband and his income.
Some girls from Fullers (20011) study, educational success was a central aspect of their identity. They saw themselves as creators of their own future and had an individualised notion of self.
They believed in meritocracy (equal opportunity for every individual to achieve) and aimed for a professional career that would enable them to support themselves.
Gender differences in achievement:
how does gender, class and ambition link together (use sociologists)
EXTERNAL FACTOR
Some w/c girls continue to have gender stereotypes aspirations for marriage and children and expect to go into traditional low paid women’s work
Reay (1998)- argues this reflects the reality of the girls class position. Their limited aspirations reflect their limited job opportunities they perceive being available to them. Being a mother and married is both attainable and offers them a sort of status.
Biaggart (2002)- found that w/c girls are more likely to face precarious position in the labour market and to see motherhood as the only viable option for their futures. See less point in achieving in education.
Gender differences in achievement:
how does equal opportunities impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
policies such as GIST (Girls into science and technology) and WISE (Women into science and engineering) encourage girls to pursue careers in these non-traditional areas. This helps girls to aim high and therefore get more qualifications.
The introduction of the National Curriculum in 1988 removed one source of gender inequality by making girls and boys study mostly the same subjects, which was often not the case previously. This means that girls aren’t being singled out and can achieve anything they want to.
Boaler (1998)- many of the barriers have been removed and schooling has become more meritocratic (based on equal opportunities) - so that girls work harder and achieve more.
Gender differences in achievement:
how have positive role models in school impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
INTERNAL FACTOR
There has been an increase in the proportion of female teachers and heads. These women in senior positions may act as role models for girls, showing them women can achieve positions of importance and giving them non-traditional goals to aim for.
To become a teacher, you need high qualifications and a successful education and therefore girls will see that and want to achieve the same thing. .
Gender differences in achievement:
How have GCSEs and coursework impacted girls achievement (use sociologists)
INTERNAL FACTOR
Gorard (2005) found that when GCSEs were introduced the gender gap increased. GCSEs brought coursework as a major part of nearly all subjects. Gorard concludes that the gender gap in achievement is because of coursework being introduced which lead to the failing of boys.
Mitsos and Browne (1998) conclude that girls are more successful in coursework because they are more conscientious and better organised than boys and this allows them to do better compared to boys which is unfair.
With GCSEs there are also oral exams and girls also do better than boys on these as well because girls often have a ‘bedroom culture’ which allows them to talk lots and therefore have a better developed language skills compared to boys.
Gender differences in achievement:
how does teacher’s attention impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
INTERNAL FACTOR
Jane and Peter French (1993) - found that boys received more attention because they attracted more telling’s offs.
Swann (1998)- found gender differences in communication styles. Boys dominate in whole-class discussion, whereas girls prefer pair-work and group-work and are better at listening and cooperating e.g take turns while speaking compared to shouting over each other.
Teachers are more likely to respond positively to girls, who they see as cooperative compared to boys who they see as disruptive.
This leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy in which successful interactions with teachers promote girls’ self-esteem and raise their achievement level
Gender differences in achievement:
how does challenging stereotypes in the curriculum impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
INTERNAL FACTOR
In the 1970s and 80s textbooks portrayed women as housewives and mothers and physics books showed them as frightened by science, and that maths books.
This helps to keep that barrier there for girls and women and means that they will be more likely to be compliant with being a housewife.
Gaby Weiner (1995) argues that since the 1980s, teachers have challenged such stereotypes. Sexist images have been removed from learning materials. This enables women and girls to continue to do well in education as there is no longer that barrier there stopping them.
This may have helped to raise girls achievement by presenting them with more positive images of what women can do.
Gender differences in achievement:
How have selection and league tables impacted girls education.
INTERNAL FACTOR
Marketisation policies have created a more competitive climate in which schools see girls as desirable recruits because they achieve better exam results.
Jackson (1998)- the introduction of exam league tables has improved opportunities for girls e.g high-achieving girls- attractive to schools low-achieving boys are not. This creates a self-fulfilling prophecy- because girls are more likely to be recruited by good schools, they are more likely to do well.
Slee (1998) argues that boys are less attractive to schools because they are more likely to suffer from behaviour issues. Because boys give the school a negative image they are less likely to be accepted.
Gender differences in achievement:
Different feminists views on girls achievement
INTERNAL FACTOR
Liberal feminists - celebrate progress made improving achievement. Believe that more progress will be made by continuing development of equal opportunities policies, encouraging positive role models and overcoming sexist attitudes and stereotypes.
Radical feminists- recognise that girls are achieving more, they emphasise that the system remains patriarchal and conveys the clear message that it is still a man’s world e.g Sexual harassment of girls continues at school.
Weiner (1993) - the secondary school history curriculum as a ‘woman-free zone’. Women are under-represented e.g history
Although there are now more female head teachers, male teachers are still more likely to become heads of secondary schools.
Identity:
How can symbolic capital impact girls achievement (use sociologist)
Archer (2010) - found that by performing their w/c feminine identities, the girls gained symbolic capital from their peers. However, this brought them into conflict with school, preventing them from getting educational capital (qualifications) and economic capital (middle-class careers).
Symbolic capital refers to the status, recognition and sense of worth that we are able to obtain from others.
Identity:
How can a hyper heterosexual feminine identities impact girls achievement (use sociologist)
The girls’ use of this feminine identity brought status from their female peer group and avoided them being insulted.
However, it also brought them into conflict with school e.g they were often punished for having the wrong appearance: too much jewellery, the wrong clothing or makeup and so on.
Teachers saw the girls’ preoccupation with appearance as a distraction that prevented them engaging with education. This led to the school ‘othering’ the girls - defining them as ‘not one of us’, incapable of educational success and thus less worthy of respect.
Archer- from the school’s point of view, the ‘ideal female pupil’ identity is a de-sexualised and middle-class one that excludes many working-class girls.
Identity:
How do boyfriends impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
Having a boyfriend brought symbolic capital, it got in the way of schoolwork and lowered girls’ aspirations.
This included losing interest in going to university, in studying ‘masculine’ subjects such as science or in a professional career.
These girls aspired to have children and work locally in w/c feminine jobs such as childcare.
Identity:
How can being loud impact girls achievement (use sociologists)
Some w/c girls adopted ‘loud’ feminine identities that often led them to be outspoken, independent and assertive.
e.g questioning teachers’ authority. This didn’t match the school’s stereotype of the ideal female pupil identity as passive and submissive to authority and brought conflict with teachers, who interpreted their behaviour as aggressive rather than assertive.
Class:
What is the w/c girls dilemma and how does this impact girls achievement
W/C girls are often faced with two choices, they can either gain symbolic capital from their peers by conforming to a hyper-heterosexual feminine identity or gain educational capital by conforming to the schools middle-class notions of a respectable, ideal female pupil
Some girls tried to cope with this dilemma by defining themselves as ‘good underneath’. This reflects the girls’ struggle to achieve a sense of self-worth within an education system that devalues their working-class feminine identities.
Archer argues that working-class feminine identities and educational success conflict with feminine identities