gender and communication Flashcards
what are the 4 approaches of gender in language?
- deficit
- dominance
- difference
- diversity
the deficit model
- argues that womens language is lacking in some form
- women cannot do certain things that men can because of a lack of ‘something in their language’
- womens language is more emotional than intelligent
the dominance model
- contrasts to the difference model
- linguists argue that language of men is more dominant in society
- language of men holds more power than of womens
the difference model
- idea that language of men and women are simply different
- neither is superior- just the style of speech adapted by a woman is in contrast to a mans
- still assumes that women and men speak differently because of their biological sex
the diversity model
- suggests that gender and sex are different things
- argue that ones biological sex has NO influence on language
- instead- society and socialisation affect our language
- there is a diverse range of factors that contribute to language use
what is Lakoff’s approach to the deficit model?
male language is seen as the norm and women’s language is viewed as different and deficient to mens language
what are somet things that lakoff suggests?
deficit model
- women are not just kept in their place by the way they use language themself
- they are socialised to use language that makes its users sound silly & powerless
- labelled womens spoken language in a way that implies it is completely different to mens
- characterised female language as having linguistic features that highlight womens uncertainty
hedges + examples
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- hedging propositions to make them sound less forceful
- sort of, i think, “im just going to the shops”
super-polite forms + examples
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- making requests indirectly and avoiding swear words
- e.g. “would you mind if…”
tag questions + examples
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- phrasing statements as tag questions, as if seeing others’ approval for ones own opinion
- e.g. “you like it, don’t you?”
intonational emphasis/emphatic stress + examples
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- could mean speaking in italics to emphasise certain words
- such as ‘very’ or ‘so’
empty adjectives + examples
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- using adjectives to over-describe something, making evaluations that are emotional rather than intellectual ones
- e.g. “divine” “adorable”
hyper-correct grammar
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
they use correct grammar with very clear articulation
direct quotation
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
because men paraphrase more
use of diminitives more than men + example
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- shortened versions of words
- e.g. Nick for Nicolas
indirect commands and requests + e.g.
LAKOFFS WOMENS LANGUAGE FEATURES (WLF)
- off record indirect
- e.g. “isnt it cold in here”- wanting the heater to be turned on
limitations of Lakoff’s theory
- ideas argued as outdated
- ideas very general about genders- not representitive of everyone
- did none of the research herself
- the WEIRD problem (white, educated, industrialised, rich, democratic)
what theorists support the dominance model?
- zimmerman and west (1975)
- Geoffrey Beattie (1982)
- Esther Greif (1980)
- pamela Fishman (1978)
key points of dominance model
- sees men as dominant because of their social and political power
- men seen as using language as a means of reinforcing or maintaining their power in conversations.
what was Zimmerman and West’s study
dominance approach
- college campus study
- recorded conversations with mixed and same genders
findings of zimmerman and west’s study
dominance approach
- men were responsible for 96% of interruptions in conversations
- men didnt let women speak & overlap them
- men rarely interrupt other men and had delayed minimal responses
- concluded that men must be attempting to dominate gender
criticims & limitations of the Zimmerman and West’s study
dominance approach
- small reseach group (not generalisable about wider population)
- only used all white, middle-class men under 35
- only counted the mixed gender conversations
why does Geoffrey Beattie’s study go against Zimmerman and west’s?
dominance approach
- he found that men and women interrupted with equal frequency
- claimed that interruptions do not necessarily have to reflect dominance but instead reflect the interest and involvement of participant in conversation
- implies that context of the conversation is crucial when analysing dominance of conversation.
what was Grief’s (1980) study?
dominance approach
- examined sex differences in the use of interruptions and similtaneous speech, during conversations between parents and pre-school children.
- each pair engaged in in semi-structured play for 30 mins
findings of Greif’s (1980) study
dominance approach
- there was no significant differences between boys and girls in the the use of 2 conversational techniques
- fathers interrupted more and spoke simultaneously more than mothers did
- these results indicate power differences between men and women- shed light on the socialisation of children into gender roles