GBH Flashcards

1
Q

DPP v Smith

A

Defines GBH as really serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Burstow

A

GBH can be serious psychiatric harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Dica

A

GBH can be serious biological harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Brown and Stratton

A

GBH can be an accumulation of more minor injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Bollom

A

Age and health are factors that can be considered when deciding whether the injuries are serious enough to be GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Martin

A

GBH can be committed indirectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Pagett

A

Uses the ‘but for’ test, where the consequence would not have happened but for D’s conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v White

A

Uses the ‘but for’ test, where the consequence would have happened but for D’s conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Smith

A

Uses the ‘operative and substantial’ test, whereby D’s actions were significant in causing the consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Pagett (intervening act)

A

Acts of a third party will not break the chain of causation if they are reasonable and foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Jordan

A

Acts of a medical third party will break the chain of causation if they are unreasonable, unforeseeable and palpably wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Roberts

A

Acts of the victim will not break the chain of causation if they are reasonable and foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Williams

A

Acts of the victim will break the chain of causation if they are unreasonable and unforeseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Blaue

A

The Thin Skull Rule shows you must take your victim as you find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Mowatt

A

Direct intention or recklessness as to cause some harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Mohan (S20)

A

Direct intention is where D aims to cause some harm

17
Q

R v Cunningham

A

Reckless is where D realises the risk of some harm but carries on regardless

18
Q

R v Belfon

A

Direct or oblique intention to cause really serious harm

19
Q

R v Mohan (S18)

A

Direct intention is where D aims to cause serious harm

20
Q

R v Woollin

A

Oblique intention is where serious harm is virtually certain and D realises it is virtually certain

21
Q

R v Morrison

A

Causing GBH and/or wounding with intention to resist arrest and intention or recklessness as to causing some harm

22
Q

R v Latimer

A

The mens rea can be transferred from the intended victim to the actual victim

23
Q

R v Thabo Meli

A

If the mens rea has formed before the actus reus, the mens rea extends to all the actions done in between

24
Q

Fagan v MPC

A

If the mens rea has formed after the actus reus, the actus reus continues until the mens rea occurs