GARRET CUME Flashcards
Define Mass resolution
For two peaks of equal height M2 -m1 is about full width half max of either peak alone
What is mass resolving power
m2 / (m2-m1) where m2-m1 is the mass resolution
(so can also be m / (FWHM) for 2 peaks equal height
What are some excpetions for resolution and resolving power
Multiply charged ion - m is replaced by m/z
What is considered “HIGH MASS RESOLVING POWER”
greater than 10k
What is RMS difference
error in ppm
Mass measurement precision - what is it
m/rms(error in ppm - from a large number of repeated measurements (so can be increased by sampling more data
Talking about mass measurement precision why are TOF’s so accurate?
Do to their fast digitizers means more points per peak width which means more sampling - = better mass measurement precision
External vs internal calibration
2x3 times less accurate than internal calibration
What resolving power do you need to resolve things of the same nominal mass but different elemental comp
200 k
What are some major factors that make TOF usable today as a high res high accuracy intstrument
Delayed ion extraction to deal with KE spread
Fast digitizers
MALDI and MALDI imaging
Orthogonal acceleartion to deal with positional and velocity spread (also ion accumulation)
Reflectron/Multipass - longer flight time means more resolution T/2dt
What is multipass TOF
has 4 electric sectors and essentially the ion goes in an elliptical shape and can do a number of turns (eg 500) can achieve 130k resolution but has limited mass range
What are the major advancements in TOF detectors
going from MCP to things that have more sensitivity at higher mass range (MCP are based on velocity and higher mass have lower velocity) - so these nanomembrane, nanomechanicl resonator and cryogenic detectors are better at this high mass
also TOF TOF so high resolution first analyzer
Where does TOF shine in comparison to other MS
No theoretical upper limit for M/Z
also fast response/scan rate
Applications for TOF?
Tox screening - fast scan speed good for LC-ESI TOF MS, additionally most tox applications are low res so this is an improvement
MSI - again fast scan speed good here - good sensitivity
Aerosol analysis - again coupled to 2d GC - really SMALL /fast peaks so fast rate is key here
Polymers - top down analysis - HIGH mass range key here - can USE ESI for intact top down approach, can do MS^2 in QTOF,
Basics on how FT and orbitrap work
1) Produce ION packets
2)CYCLOTRON motion from the magnet traps radial - brought into coherence with dipolar RF excitation
3)orbitrap achieved by injecting in a short time compared to ion oscillation frequency
orbi is 2 electrodes one around the other - in ideal kingdom field the axial motion is m/z dependant -
- ICR spatial coherence maintained through confining with magnetic and electrostatic fields whereas orbitrap does it and radial coherence is lost as it form a rotating ring
4) detection done from the periodic motion - from detector plates creates an IMAGE CURRENT
5) detect ions - time domain subject to transformation - frequency domain then to mass
6) resolution based on transient time
Major advances in FT’s and orbis
FT - using higher field strenght magnet (15 and 21 T)
Orbi - based off equation can either change ratio of R2 and R1 (radius of outer barrel vs ratio of inner spindle)
Both also have geometries that can be optimized/overcome imperfections from requires ions to pass through
better calibration equations to deal with ion abundance/systematic error (Adding an ion abundance term
Phase correction (using absorption vs magnitude)
Imrpoved data stations with lower latency ,
Other FT improvements
Phase correction(?) dont understand need to read again
Also Data workstations have gotten lower latency - allow for more control to increase res
Ways Fragmentation can be done in FT and orbi
CID or ETD for orbi, outside
CID (internal or external) , ECD, IRMPD in FT
FT and orbi applications
Top down proteomics - High res and mass accuracy really key to resolve isotope distributions from peptides, high charge states and isobaric peptide compositions (can also use LC-ESI for more fractionation or MALDI for high mass, less charged ions)
also good for bottom up and shotgun
middle down protoemics (for large proteins that do not fragment in gas phase efficiently - do partial protein digestion - LARGE peptides
Protein quant - SILAC,
Metabalomics
Lipidomics - elemental composition from isotope fine structure
RNA/DNA analysis - can look at synthetic, RNA sequencing, can also see interferences s, tRNA PTMS, etc - looking at nucleic acid contaminants of asphaltene during crude oil processing
ENviro and food safety - trace contaminants, analogs etc c
Difference between bottom up and shotgun
Bottom is seperated on a gel first, shotgun isnt
Strengths and challenges of metabolomics vs proteomics
Strengths -
many metabolites can be common across species
Dynamics fast - reflect changes well
Sample prep relatively simple (can be more complex if needed)
Challenges:
False discovery rates difficult to ascertain, ID cannot be inferred from fragments, many metabolites being common can make it discern biological origin in a study
Targeted vs untargeted appraoch/goals
Targeted is typically quantification/detection of a known limited panel (hypothesis driven)- validation , absolute quant, ms/ms compared to standard
Untargeted is not limited- as many as possible - acquire features - ID them and try to review known and unknown metabolic changes (hypothesis generating)- discoveryrelative ,
biased by sample prep.
quant ms/ms compared to library qualitative ID
2 approaches to untargeted metabolomics
DDA - data dependant we scan Q1 and then go back and do MS/MS of the highest intensity ions
- cleaner spectra - bias for high intesnity
DIA - Data independent - scan Q1 and then MS/MS of everything
various strategies such as MS^E - do everything or SWATH - do in m/z buckets
a lot messier but gets everything somewhat intensity independent
Common instrumentation for metabolomics
LC, I/M, GC, CE, MS or NMR
LC–MS is popular , polar non polar, sensitivity, lots of good literature,
I/M becoming more popular for enantiomers etc
What are some strengths of ion mobility
increased peak capacity
faster than chromatography
determine CCS - another way to fractionate or separate -
hsycial property of molecule not setting dependant
More precise - inter lab CCS is less than 5% for awide range of molecules
General steps in Metabolomics data anlysis/ID
General steps
ncluding noise filtering, peak detection, peak deconvolution, retention time alignment, and finally
feature annotation.
What are the 5 levels of confidence
LVL 5- UNIQUE feature (eg mass measurement)
LVL 4 - Molecular FOrmula (charge state, isotope abundance , high accuracy)
LEVEL 3 - Tentative structure (MS1 m/z database match) -accurate mass and isotopic structure produce data base matches
LEVEL 2 - putative ID - MS/MS spectrum match (structura info))(almost like level1 without a reference standard - orthogonal info -mainly MS/MS)
LEVEL 1 - validated ID - reference standard confirmation with 2 orthogonal pieces of info
How to calculate mass defect
Exact monoisotopic mass - nominal mass (just adding up protons and neutrons)