furcation management parts 1 and 2 Flashcards
Goals of Therapy
Arrest the?
Prevent further?
Regenerate?
Prevent?
Arrest the active disease
Prevent further loss of attachment
Regenerate lost periodontium
Prevent disease reoccurrence
Objectives of Furcation Therapy
Access for?
Access for?
Establish?
Access for home care
Access for maintenance
Establish physiologic bone and tissue architecture
Goldman-incipient or Glickman-Grade I furcations
- Pocket formation into the flute of the
furca, but the inter-radicular bone is
intact.
Goldman-cul-de-sac or Glickman-Grade II furcation
- Loss of inter-radicular bone with pocket formation of varying depths into the furca, but not completely through to the other side.
- Can be shallow or deep
Goldman-through and through or Glickman-Grade III
- Complete loss of inter-radicular bone
with pocket formation allowing probe to
pass completely to the other side
Glickman-Grade IV
- Loss of attachment and gingival
recession that has made the furcation
clearly visible to clinical examination
hamp classification, degrees?
Hamp- classification of the horizontal component of furcation involvement
* Degree 1: horizontal loss less than 3mm
* Degree 2: horizontal loss >3mm but not the total width of furcation area
* Degree 3: through and through
Tanrow classification
Tarnow: classification of the vertical component of furcation involvement
* Subclass A: vertical loss up to 1/3 of furca (1-3 mm)
* Subclass B: vertical loss up to 2/3 of furca (4-6 mm)
* Subclass C: vertical loss into the apical third (>7mm)
Grade/Class II or Grade/Class III furcation involvement automatically places patient into what stages of periodontitis
Stage III or Stage IV Periodontitis.***
Diagnosis of furcal involvement
Clinically probing the furcations
- Standard “straight” probing with a
straight probe only measures the vertical attachment loss, and the extent of the horizontal loss will not be detected - “Curved” probing (Nabers) with a curved probe will determine the horizontal attatchement loss
Location of furcation entrances for maxillary molar
- Mesial furcation toward palatal 1/3 so probe from palatal
- Distal furcation in mid 1/3 (under contact point) so probe from palatal (or buccal)
- Buccal furcation from buccal!
Radiographic and Clinical Diagnosis
Study looked at 72 pts with chronic
periodontitis and 90% of the 303 maxillary molars had furcation bone loss.
* % diagnosed by probing alone,
* % by radiographs alone and
* % diagnosed using both clinical and
radiographs.
Study looked at 72 pts with chronic
periodontitis and 90% of the 303 maxillary molars had furcation bone loss.
* 3% diagnosed by probing alone,
* 22% by radiographs alone and
* 65% diagnosed using both clinical and
radiographs.
Study evaluated 312 mandibular molars and 35% had furcation involvement.
* % were diagnosed by probing alone
* % diagnosed by radiographs alone,
* % diagnosed by a both of
radiographic and clinical examination.
Study evaluated 312 mandibular molars
and 35% had furcation involvement.
* 9% were diagnosed by probing alone
* 8% diagnosed by radiographs alone,
* 18% diagnosed by a both of
radiographic and clinical examination.
Cervical Enamel Projections
* Grades?
Incidence ranges? common demo?
Implications of CEPs:
- Grade I, II, III depending on extension
towards and into the furcation
Incidence ranges from 17-33% from
various studies, (mandibular second molar has highest incidence). Studies of Asian populations have far higher incidence.
Implications of CEPs: epithelial attachmen
CEP grades