Functions of education system Flashcards
Functionalist theories on education
-Positivist view that ed benefits individual and wider society
-Helps maintain value consensus (agreeing on same values by teaching children values of society
-System = meritocratic (gives everyone equal chance of success)
5 Functions of education (Functionalism)
-Secondary socialisation (Parsons)
-Social solidarity (Durkheim)
-Focal socialising agency (Parsons)
-Specialist skills (Durkheim)
-Role allocation (Davis and Moore)
Parsons secondary socialisaiton
-Learn norms + values beyond family
-Noms like queuing but also competition working hard + respect.
-Teaches first instrumental relatioships (those based off getting smthg off them , deferred gratification + meritocracy)
-Judged by ability + work ethic rather than family
Criticism of idea of secondary socialisation
-Feminists –> schools patriarchal
-Radical feminists –> male gaze : girls feel pressure to conform to stereotypes keeping subordinate to men
-Wrong –> ppl not puppets of system and pupils may reject values education attempts to pass on
Durkheim : Social solidarity
-Ed meets functional requisite by passing on to new gens the central or core values + culture of society
-Helps make sure students are integrated fully into society creating value consensus
-Hidden curric + overt curric
EXAMPLE usa–> children pledge allegiance to American flag
–> School assemblies and team sports
Criticism of social solidarity
-Marxist Bourdieu –> m:c institutions teaching m.c culture . m:c students fit into the mc habits
SO w.c children not integrated bec culture = devalued and ignored by education system . w.c children suffer symbolic violence in schools .
-Feminists : Passes on patriarchal values and disadvantages girls .
Parsons : Focal Socialising agency
-schools = ‘society in miniature’ (prepare young ppl for life in wider society)
-Takes over from family as they grow older
-Bridge between family and
wider society
-Family : particularistic standards (treated special which is given to them at birth –> ascribed status
-Wider society : universalistic standards (same standards apply to everyone + have to work to achieve status) –> achieved status
-Wider society = meritocratic + ppl earn status through individual achievements eg qualifications
-Schools bridge gap
-All work marked on same standards
Criticisms of idea of meritocracy
-Marxist Bowles and Gintis –> meritocracy is a myth
>Students social class background determines educational success
>w.c children lack cultural capital (set of tastes , values , interests and knowledge which lead to rewards
-Many inherit wealth
-Many upper class jobs where ascribed status ccharectaristics = important
Durkheim : Specialist skills
-Prep for payed employment
-Schools teach students specialist skills for work
-Range of qualifications which become more specialised
-GCSES give range of knowledge
-Post 16 : Fewer courses with more specialised knowledge
-Good for economy
-Vocational education w/ job specific knowledge eg BTEC hairdressing , childcare , catering etc
Criticism of specialist skills
-Employers often complain schools dont prep young people enough for work
-Vocational courses often seen as lower skilled courses in schools –> w.c children chanelleded into these ending up in low paid job
Davis and Moore role allocation
-Helps prep fit children into economy
-Shifts and sorts students into future roles through role allocation.
-example : student who gets a star in biology will go on to become a doctor
-Makes sure most talented and qualified allocated to most important jobs.
-Meritocratic + there is equality of opportunity
Criticism of role allocation
Marxists : No equality of opportunity : everyone doesn’t start at same point and not everyone has same chance of success
Feminists : girls role allocation determined by patriarchy + girls socialised into stereotypically ‘feminine’ subjects like health and social care.
-Doesn’t act as ‘natural sieve’
How does new right ideas also reflect functionalist ideas
Believe:
-Education = meritocratic
-Should train future workforce
-Should socialise children into shared national identity
BUT argue education should be controlled by gov not market forces
What do New right argue?
1.The problem with the education system
-ed system fails if controlled by state
-State schools run by bureaucracies which are accountable to elected politicians
-UK : called LEAS - Local Education Authorities
-G Tulloch : Producer capture
>Those who produce are in control rather than those who control
>Groups such as teachers + other employees in ed bureaucracies have interest in inc of expenditure on ed to make jobs more secure
Criticisms of N.R theories
Brown and Lauder : Reasons given above are excuses to cut costs –> educational achievement will be impacted (especially in disadvantaged areas)
- Solution to the problem : Marketisation
-Businesses + parental choice
-Market forces of sup + demand introduced
-Open days , school websites, prospectuses
-Competition –> raising standards to attract cosnumers
Criticism of N.R + marketisation
-Exam factories–> grade focus –> negative impact on wellbeing –> students sugaring from m.health concerns increasing
-A-C economy (gilbourn and youdel) –> students who have no chance of achieving c labelled as hopeless cases as won’t contribute to image of school
3.Solution to problem : Parentocracy
Chub and Moe:
-Parents should have vouchers w/ money to offer the school of their choice.
-Every school will work hard to improve teaching and exam results to appeal to new parents and students .
-soooo students will leave school w/ better exam results.
Criticism of n.r and idea of parentocracy
Gerwitz + Ball :
-Parentocracy = myth
-Only m.c parents have greater choice bec they have educational capital.
-Know how schools work etc
-Also can move into catchment areas of good schools as they can afford higher house prices (Selection by mortgage)
- Solution : Involvement of private companies
-Support of privatisation : taking state funded education out of state control and into hands of private companies
-EXAMPLE : exam boards = priv businesses and make profit from schools entering students for exams
-Privatisation would make ed system more efficient and improve standards
Criticism of N.R theories and involvement of priv companies
-ed became multi million pound business w/ companies attracting customers for money
-Competing exam boards –> schools will chose examinations that lead to better grades as they are evaluated on their league table options –> not increasing standards but rather a ‘race to the bottom’
5.BUT still some involvement of the state
-Some involvement of state needed to imposed judgement framework on schools.
-Ofsted , League tables and SATS .
-Will allow schools to compete and be compared to by parents
Criticisms of n.r theories and the idea of imposed judge work frameworks
-Means state is deciding what a ‘good education’ looks like so not a ‘free market’
–> summer hill (school founded on lib perspectives w/ progressive teaching methods) failed by Ofsted despite it being pop w/ parents and then later won a court case to overturn the judgement.
6.To transmit a shared culture through the national curriculum
-n.r argued schools should teach British values through subjects such as History and religious studies w. emphasis on single set of values and move away from multiculturalism
Criticisms of N.r theories and idea of imposed framework
-Contradictory –> emphasis on letting schools give education that parents / pupils choose (academies don’t have to teach natural curriculum)
-Marxists: Other cultures devalued
Bowles and Gintis
-Argue education system supports capitalism in three ways :
>Myth of meritocracy
>hidden curriculum
>Correspondance principle
Bowles and Gintis - Myth of meritocracy and legitimation of inequality
-Education system not meritocratic
-Students don’t have equal chance of success
-Achievement determined by students social class background not effort or ability
-W.C more likely to fail or get poor exam results bec they’re disadvantages
-Made to believe m.c is meritocratic so they don’t challenge the system
-Pupils blame selves for educational failure and accept their lot in life
-Reproducing social class inequalities and reproduction o labour power .
Criticism of B+G Marxist theories + beliefs meritocracy is a myth
–Func –> meritocrrati all students have equal chance . grades are down to work (equality of opportunity)