Functionalist, Strain And Subcultural Theories Flashcards
1
Q
Durkheim, functionalism, crime and deviance
A
- the idea that deviance is just behaviour that breaks social norms, whilst crime breaks the laws that reflect these norms, is based on the belief that society is essentially consensual - that is, the idea that the vast majority of people share similar values. Indeed, it was this approach regarding was used by Durkheim in his functionalist explanation of deviance and its relationship to crime. Durkheim suggests that every society shares a set of care values, which he called the collective conscience. The more behaviour differed from these core values, the more likely it was to be viewed as deviant. According to Durkheim a strong collective conscience, backed up by a fair legal system that compensated those harmed by deviant behaviour and punished offenders, formed biases for social order
- however, Durkheim, perhaps surprisingly identified two sides of crime and deviance influencing the functioning of society:
- a positive side, which helped society change and remain dynamic
- a negative side, which saw too much crime leading to a social disruption
2
Q
Positive aspects of crime: social cohesion
A
- according to Durkheim crime - or at least a certain amount of crime - was necessary for any society. He argued that the basis of society was a set of shared values or collective conscience. The collective conscience provide as a framework, with boundaries which distinguishes between actions that are acceptable and those that are not. The problem for any society is that these boundaries are unclear, and also that they change over time. Crime can play a role in clarifying boundaries between what is seen as acceptable and unacceptable and, where necessary, can initiate change. Specially, Durkheim discussed three elements of this aspect of
1. Reaffirming the boundaries
2. Changing values
3. Social cohesion
3
Q
- Reaffirming the boundaries
A
- every time a person breaks a law and is taken to court, the resulting court ceremony, and the publicity in the newspapers, publicly reaffirms the existing values. This is particularly clear in societies in which public punishment take place - e.g, where a murderer is taken out to be executed in public or adulterer is stone death
4
Q
- Changing values
A
- on occasion some individuals or groups deliberately set out to defy laws that they believe are wrong. Sometimes, these people are ahead of their time and defy laws that will eventually be seen as outdated. Such groups are known as functional rebels because they help to change the collective conscience, and laws based on it, for the better, anticipating and helping to produce changes that will help society to function more effectively and fairly. E.g, the former ANC leader, the late Nelson Mandela, who opposed and helped to overturn the racist apartheid system in South Africa
5
Q
- Social cohesion
A
- Durkheim points out that when particularly horrific crimes have been committed, the entire community draws together in shared outrage, and the sense of belonging to a community is thereby strengthened. This was noticeable, e.g, in the uk following the July 2005 London Underground bombings
6
Q
What have other writers suggested about positive factors of crime
A
- the functionalist Davis suggested that crime could be useful as safety valve which allowed minor criminality or deviance to avoid bigger problems. E.g, the institution of marriage could be stabilised by some married men buying the services of sex workers.
- cohen suggested that Cronin could boost employment and the economy by creating jobs for police officers and others who work in criminal justice, not to mention criminologists. He also believes that crime can act as a type of early warning mechanism showing that society, or institutions within it are, going wrong. These can then be corrected before too much damage is done and, in the process, crime is brought back under control
7
Q
Left realists - lea and young
A
- stress that crime can cause real problems for victims, especially those who are already disadvantaged.
8
Q
Right realists - Wilson and kelling
A
- stress the harm that crime can do to community cohesion and informal social control. If left unchecked, crime can lead to the breakdown of law and order, with disastrous consequences for those living in the affected area
9
Q
Right realists - Wilson and kelling
A
- stress the harm that crime can do to community cohesion and informal social control. If left unchecked, crime can lead to the breakdown of law and order, with disastrous consequences for those living in the affected area
10
Q
The negative aspects of crime: anomie and egoism
A
- while certain limited amount of crime may perform postive functions for society, according to Durkheim, too much crime has negative consequences. Excessive crime could be the result of two problems with the collective conscience - anomie and egoism
11
Q
What is anomie
A
- anomie occurs when there are periods of great social change or stress, and the collective conscience becomes uncleared. During a revolution or rapid economic and social change, and old values and norms may come under challenge without new values and norms becoming established. In this situation, there is uncertainty over what behaviour should be seen as acceptable, and people may be partially freed from the social control imposed by the collective conscience
12
Q
What is egosim
A
- egosim occurs when the collective conscience simply becomes too weak to restrain the selfish desires of individuals. It occurs in industrial societies where there are many specialists jobs so that people have very different roles in society. Soldiers and nurses, e.g, have to have very different values to carry out their jobs successfully. If individuals are not successfully socialised to accept collective values, e,g, through the education system, they can end up putting their own selfish interests before those of society as a whole and committing crime
13
Q
Egoism and anomie
A
- egoism and anomie can be countered, according to Durkheim, by a strengthening of the collective conscience; but when this is not done effectively, crime rates can become excessive, preventing the healthy functioning of society
- durkhiems concept of anomie was later developed and adapted by Merton, which suggested that durkhiems orginal idea was too vague. Merton, provided the foundation for the development of later subculture theory
14
Q
Evaluation of durkhiem
A
- Newbury argues that two aspects of durkhiems work have been central in the development of sociological thinking on crime
1. Durkheim was the first to suggest that some level of crime is normal in society
2. Durkheim had the sociological insight to see that crime was linked to the values of particular societies and these values could change - however, Newbury thinks that Durkheim paid little attention to how the powerful could have undue influence on what acts were seen as criminal. Durkheim exaggerated the extent to which there was a collective conscience in society. Not everyone agrees with laws and morals, not least many criminals themselves. A further criticism is put forward by Taylor, Walton and young who argue that crime itself is not functional for society. It is instead just the publicising of crime and public punishment that help to untie a society; critics have nites that most serious crime such as murder or sex crime/abuse is far from beneficial. Nevertheless durkhiems work has been very influential, as the section on strain theory demonstrates
15
Q
Strain theory
A
- in the 1930s, Merton tried to develop an explanation of deviance within a functionalist framework. However, Merton did not agree with other functionalists that all aspects of society were always beneficial: aspects of society could become dysfunctional and needed to be changes to get society running smoothly again. For Merton, crime and deviance were evidence for a poor fit between the socially accepted goals of society and the socially approved means of obtating those desired goals. The resulting strain led to deviance. Unlike later theorists, Merton was not a subcultural theorist. This just a point of difference between him and cohen: Merton focused on individual rather than group responses to strain.
- Merton argued that all socties set their members certain goals and, at the same time, provided socially approved ways of achieving these goals.
- however, Merton was aware that not everyone had the same opportunity to achieve these gaols. In an unequal class based society, those in high classes had more opportunity to succeed than others. They had, e.g, access to better schools and more wealth to back them if they wanted to start a business. Merton believed that the system only worked well as long as there was a reasonable chance that a majority of people were able to achieve their goals. However, in a very unequal American society, many among the population were unable to achieve the socially set goals, and they become disenchanted with society’s.