functionalist, strain and subcultural theories - topic 1 Flashcards
durkheims functionalist theory - inevitably of crime
crime is inevitable because of 2 reasons
1 not everyone is equally and effectively socialised into shared norms and values
2 diversions of lifestyle and values, so diff groups develop their own subculture
modern soc has a complex division of labour so individuals increase in differences from one another therefore weakening the shared culture and collective conscience
durkheims functional theory - boundary maintenance
crime produced is a reaction from soc
the function of punishment is to reaffirm society’s shared values and reinforce social solidarity
reaffirm the values of the law abiding majority and discourage others from rule breaking
durkheims functionalist theory - adaptation and change
all change starts with an act of deviance
1 too much crime threatens to tear the bonds of society apart
2 too little crime means society is repressed and member r being controlled too much which stifles the individuals freedom and prevents change
durkheims functionalist theory - other functions of crime (davis, polsky, cohen)
davis; prostitution acts as a safety valve 4 release of men’s frustration w/o threatening thr nuclear family
polsky; pornography safely ‘channels’ sexual desires away from alternative acts such as adulterer which could threaten the family
cohen; deviance acts as a warning that the institutions r not functioning properly - policies need to be changed
functionalist evaluation
1 fails 2 identify how much crime is too much crime so not clear when anomie begins
2 don’t explain how crime develops in the first place
3 ign that cr does not benefit the victim
mertons strain theory
1 American culture promotes the American dream but some people are not able to achieve the American dream due to a lack of opportunities as a result of inequality
2 most people have been socialised to believe that meritocracy is fair and success is a good goal to have
3 but not all people can achieve this in the same way which leads to the feeling of strain
what are mertons five responses to strain
1 conformity - accept goals and strive to do them legitimately
2 innovation - accept goals and strive to do them but illegitimately
3 ritualise - indiv gives up on trying to achieve goals but follows rules 4 own sake
4 rebellion - indiv rej goals and want to replace them w new ones to bring about revolutionary change
5 retreatism - indiv rej b goals/legitimate means so become drop outs of soc
evaluation of merton
1 takes OS at face value wh over rep the w/c cr so merton sees cr as a w/c phenomenon
2 marxists; he ign power of ruling class 2 make/enforce laws in ways that criminalise the poor not rich
3 assumes there’s a value consensus and that everyone strives for monetary success which ignores the possibility that many may not share that goal in the first place
4 only accounts for utilitarian crime 4 money not violent crime
travis hirschi - bonds of attachment
explains why maj people are law abiding citizens who don’t commit crimes bec of their bonds of attachment
1 attachment - how much we care about what others think
2 commitment - what have we got to lose
3 involvement - how involved are we with society
4 belief - to what extent do we believe obeying the law is the right thing to do
what is a sub cultural strain theory
theories sees deviance as a product of delinquent subcultures with different values from those of mainstream society
what does cohen critique merton on
1 merton sees deviance as an individual response to strain and ignores group crime, esp among young
2 merton focuses on utilitarian crime and ign those w no economic motive ie. vandalism/assault
cohen status frustration - subcultural strain theory
1 cohen focuses on deviance in w/c bs who face anomie in m/c dominanted education sys and suff fr cultural deprivation and lack of skills
2 leaves them at bottom of status hierarchy and so suffer status fust from given the low status given by mainstream soc
3 resolution is to rej mainstream m/c values and turn to others in the same situ forming delinquent subculture
cohen - alternative status hierarchy
1 delinquent subcultures invert values of mainstream soc
2 whatever soc condemns the subcultures praise, ex respect 4 property they will vandalise
3 subc provi an alternative status hierarchy which they will be able to achieve
4 bs create their own illegitimate opportunity struct, wins status from peer thru delinquent acts
5 cohens theory explains non economic delinquency
what is the criticism of cohens alternative status hierarchy
1 cohen assumes all w/c bs start off by sharing m/c success and goals and rej them when they fail he ign those who never shared them in the first place so never saw themselves as failures
coward and ohlin - 3 subcultures
1 they note that not everyone adapts to situ by turning to innovation
2 there’s unequal access in illegitimate opportunities too
3 arg diff neighbourhoods prov diff illegitimate opportunities 4 young people 2 learn criminal skills