Functionalist explanations of crime and deviance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does Merton say about crime and deviance?

A
  • There are clearly defined goals in society, and clearly defined means to achieve these goals (e.g: hard work, skill)
  • If goals are emphasised more than the means to achieve them/if alternative means become accessible/acceptable/ preferred, anomie occurs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Merton’s strain theory?

A
  • There is sometimes strain towards anomie
  • The goal becomes more important than the means- people do whatever it takes to ‘win’
    5 responses to strain:
    1) Conformity (hard work, legitimate)
    2) Innovation (illegitimate means)
    3) Ritualism (lower goals- realistic)
    4) Retreatism (drop out of society)
    5) Rebellion (create own goals)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Durkheim say about crime and anomie?

A
  • Anomie= state of normlessness (no agreed rules= chaos)- damaging to society
  • Crime is an integral part of a healthy society
  • Some c+d is inevitable- people test boundaries
  • Socialisation prevents anomie
  • Small amounts of C+D can prevent anomie if it is punished (BUT, if permitted= breakdown of social order, state of anomie- threaten stabilty of society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Durkheim say about crime and social solidarity?

A
  • Social solidarity= sense of cohesion felt bt society (feel as part of a whole), e.g.: royal births/weddings, world cup, olympics
  • “Crime brings together upright consciences”
  • Discussed outrage about a small town scandal which led to the expression of ‘public temper’- promotes SS
  • Collective conscience- shared values and ideas about right and wrong= communities police themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do functionaists say about crime/deviance and boundaries?

A
  • Society’s members must learn the boundaries of what is acceptable behaviour
  • C+D shows members where boundaries of right and wrong are, through public condemndation and punishment
  • Any deviance must be identified and punished by agencies of social control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Erikson say about crime and deviance?

A
  • All community members participate in confrontations with a deviant, who transgresses the boundaries (i.e. public degradation ceremonies- public trial/media coverage)
  • Decline of public punishment with the development of newspapers (+ radio, TV, social media= role of condemners)
  • Boundaries are always shifting and changes may occur
  • Deviance help society progress, as it shows when anew value consensus emerges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Eisenstadt say about crime and deviance?

A
  • Youths commit crime and deviance as a means of letting of steam and releasing tensions
  • Small amounts are acceptable, as it reinforces boundaries, norms and values of society, therefore preventing worse crime and deviance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Davis say about crime and deviance?

A
  • Study of prostitution suggests goals of sexual behaviour in men are not inherently social but that societies need to restrict morally acceptable expressions of sexuality to the family context
  • Prostitution= safe outlet for sexual tension
  • Deviance= safety valve, let off steam
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluating Durkheim

A
  • Influential ideas, applied to real life examples
  • Did NOT explain why individuals commit crime, why some do so more than others and why different people are deviant in different ways
  • No consideration of negative effects of deviance on individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluating Merton

A
  • Financial success is not the only goal, there are many others reasons for deviance, deviancy could fall into more than one category
  • Taylor- slot machine analogy:
  • Conformists play and win fairly, innovators cheat, ritualists play mindlessly, retreatists give up, rebels play a different game
  • Taylor- Merton does not ask important questions of: who put the machine there in the first place? who’s keeping the profits?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly