full ev Flashcards
What do the 404-415 rules do?
These rules limit the admissibility of relevant evidence.
Examples:
*under 404(b), evidence of prior bad acts is sometimes excluded where it would cause prejudice against the accused.
*in Tort cases, 407 excludes evidence of subsequent remedial measures bc we don’t want to discourage litigants from fixing conditions that could cause more injuries in the future.
*408 excludes evidence of offers to compromise bc we want to encourage settlement thru full and frank negotiation
*409 excludes evidence of offers to pay medical expenses because we want to ensure that indigent or underinsured victims receive medical treatment as soon as possible.
What are the key rules in the 404-415 sections
The key rules are 404 and 405.
True or False:
under 404(b), evidence of prior bad acts is sometimes excluded where it would cause prejudice against the accused.
True
under 404(b), evidence of prior bad acts is sometimes excluded where it would cause prejudice against the accused
True or False:
in Tort cases, 407 excludes evidence of subsequent remedial measures bc we don’t want to discourage litigants from fixing conditions that could cause more injuries in the future.
True
in Tort cases, 407 excludes evidence of subsequent remedial measures bc we don’t want to discourage litigants from fixing conditions that could cause more injuries in the future.
True or False:
408 excludes evidence of offers to compromise bc we want to encourage settlement thru full and frank negotiation
True
408 excludes evidence of offers to compromise bc we want to encourage settlement thru full and frank negotiation
True or False:
409 excludes evidence of offers to pay medical expenses because we want to ensure that indigent or underinsured victims receive medical treatment as soon as possible.
True
409 excludes evidence of offers to pay medical expenses because we want to ensure that indigent or underinsured victims receive medical treatment as soon as possible.
Does FRE 401 and 403 Balancing test apply to evidence that meets other requirements under 404-415?
Yes. You must still use the balancing test even if your evidence meets all the other requirements under 404-415
What does rule 404 cover generally?
FRE 404 - Evidence of Character and Prior Acts
What does rule 404(a) cover generally?
FRE 404(a) - Use of character evidence to prove action on a particular occasion.
What is “character evidence” according to 404(a)?
Character Evidence means evidence regarding a person’s disposition or propensity to engage or not to engage in certain types of behavior
E.g
*a character for truthfulness or untruthfulness
*peaceableness or violence,
*recklessness or care
*drunkenness or temperace
What does it mean to use character evidence “to prove action on a particular occassion” ?
This is the most common use of character evidence.
Basically, the strategy is to suggest that a witness has a tendency to act in a certain way, so he probably acted that way on this occasion.
The proponent is asking the jury to draw a “propensity inference”: conduct on a particular occasion is to be inferred from general propensity.
What is the general rule under 404(a)?
Character evidence shouldn’t be used to show propensity.
“Evidence of a person’s character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait”
This prohibition applies in both criminal and civil trials.
Under 404(a)(2) - What are the exceptions to general exclusion of character evidence when offered to show propensity?
aka
When is character evidence allowed to be used to show propensity?
404(a)(2) allows the use of character evidence to show propensity in the following limited contexts:
Character of Accused
Character of Alleged Victim
Character of Witness
Explain the first of the contexts where character evidence is allowed to be used to show propensity:
404(a)(2) allows the use of character evidence to show propensity in the following limited contexts:
- Character of Accused*
- Character of Alleged Victim
- Character of Witness
404(a)(2) allows the use of character evidence to show propensity in the following limited contexts:
- Character of Accused*
404(a)(2)(A) - in a criminal case “a defendant may offer evidence of the defendants pertinent trait, and if the evidence is admitted, the prosecutor may offer evidence to rebut it”
404(a)(2)(B) - when the accused complains that the alleged victim has a certain trait, the prosecution can present evidence that the accused actually has that trait.
Basically, no evidence regarding the general character of a criminal defendant will come in unless the defendant himself “opens the door” by offering evidence of his good character, or by attacking the character of the alleged victim.
Explain the second context where character evidence is allowed to be used to show propensity:
404(a)(2) allows the use of character evidence to show propensity in the following limited contexts:
- Character of Accused
- Character of Alleged Victim*
- Character of Witness
404(a)(2) allows the use of character evidence to show propensity in the following limited contexts:
Character of Alleged Victim
404(a)(2)(B) - in a criminal case “a defendant may offer evidence of an alleged victims pertinent trait, and if the evidence is admitted, the prosecutor may….offer evidence to rebut it”
404(a)(2)(C) - in a homicide case “the prosecutor may offer evidence of the allege victims trait of peacefulness to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor”
None of this evidence will come in unless the defendant somehow opens the door, either by attacking the character of the alleged victim OR in a homicide case, arguing the alleged victim attacked the defendant first.
Note 412 - rape shield - might limit ability of defendant to sully reputation of accuser in sexual assault cases.