Friendship and romantic relationships Flashcards

1
Q

What did Baumeister & Leary, 1995 say about the fundamental need to belong?

A

An evolutionary basis for seeking relationships –> the idea is that we are somehow biologically evolved to seek out contact

The need to belong is universal –> there seems to be a universal tendency – we don’t know of any culture or society that prefer to live in isolation or try to minimise social contact

The need to belong guides social cognition

The need to belong is satiable –> the longing can be satisfied by social contact

There will be profound negative consequences if the need is not met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What reasons are there for affiliating?

A

Hill 1987

Reduce uncertainty through comparing with others
Be positively stimulated
Obtain confirmation and recognition
Receive emotional support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is social support have a buffer effect?

A

Cohen & Hoberman, 1983

As expected, people that reported being more stressed were suffering from more physical symptoms. However, this relationship was far more pronounced for those who reported not having any social support.

Social support can function as a buffer so you can cope with a lot more stress in your life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the relational self-theory?

A

Anderson & Chen, 2002

This theory argues that we have a portfolio of sets of identities that we build up in relation to other people. You’re not exactly the same person, but you behave in a certain way towards your mum, friends and teachers etc. If you meet someone who reminds you of one of these people, you start acting like you did with that person.

  • Relational selves are build in interactions (together with associated beliefs, feelings, etc.)
  • People who remind us of prior significant others activate these relational selves
  • We start behaving and feeling towards them as we did to the prior significant other

This is almost similar to the Freudian concepts of projection and counter transference. This is where you bring things from your past and project it onto someone in the present even if it’s not necessarily appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are attachment styles and what do they show?

A

It’s a developmental basis for how we conduct our relationships (Ainsworth, 1970).

They identified three main attachment styles.

Secure - finds it easy to get close to others, comfortable with mutual dependence, doesn’t worry about being abandoned.

Avoidant - uncomfortable being close, difficult to trust and doesn’t like to depend on others

Anxious - feels others are reluctant to get as close as one would like, worries that the partner doesn’t really love them, extreme desire to merge with other which might put them off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of relationships are there?

A

Clark & Mills, 1993

There are exchange relationships and communal relationships.

Exchange relationships are very business-like, it may be beneficial towards both people. They could continue for as long as it’s beneficial and then they can move on. They feel no obligation to take care of one another’s wellbeing etc.

In comparison in communal relationships, they feel mutual responsibility. The support that people require is defined in terms of the need principle rather than the equity principle. You look for what support the person needs and help them with whatever they require which wouldn’t happen in the workplace. E.g., with family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is social exchange theory?

A

(Thibault & Kelly, 1959)

According to social exchange theory, social behavior involves social exchanges where people are motivated by obtaining something of value (reward) in exchange for forfeiting something else of value (cost).

Relationship satisfaction depends on comparison level –> you compare with relationships from the past and see if you are faring better or worse. This also depends on perceived alternatives

The idea of the social exchange theory is that we enter relationships with others if we can maximise our own utility. Maximising your own utility is when your rewards outweigh your costs. Relationships can be costly, but you also get something in return – you know that these people will also help you when you need it.

Sometimes you see a mismatch in terms of age and perceived attractiveness in relationships, but often the two are getting something out of it. There are other dimensions brought to the relationship that can balance it out e.g., in monetary terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a limitation of the social exchange theory?

A

People do not always act in self-interested ways (i.e., maximizing rewards and minimizing costs). For instance, in intimate relationships, people act communally, working for the benefit of their partner or relationship, sometimes even at great cost to oneself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is imago theory/therapy?

A

Hendrix 1980

This theory explains why we choose a specific partner that resembles our parents because it’s a chance to heal childhood wounds.

It allows people to relive areas of their childhood that weren’t that positive such as aggression, violence, alcoholism, being ignored and other negative experiences. They look for a romantic partner that puts them in the same situation to overcome the challenge in a better way, because as children we weren’t well equipped to deal with a lot of negative things we were faced with. E.g., if someone grew up with an alcoholic parent, they’re more likely to have a romantic partner later on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the halo effect?

A

Thorndike, 1920

The halo effect is a type of cognitive bias whereby our perception of someone is positively influenced by our opinions of that person’s other related traits.

e.g., if someone is physically attractive, everything else will appear in a more positive light – it affects judgement on totally unrelated issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the effects of physical attractiveness?

A

Signal & Landy, 1973

Someone’s physical attractiveness is also dependent on who they affiliate with.

Two confederates behaved as a couple or as if they didn’t know each other at all. The female confederate was made to look attractive and ugly using makeup and clothing. Participants had to rate the male confederate.

Researchers found that if the female confederate was made to look attractive and if she was portrayed to be his girlfriend, then the male confederate was judged as much more physically attractive. This is an example of how our perception of the world is informed by what we know about each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What evidence is there of physical arousal being misattributed due to attractiveness?

A
  • Participants were told that they would be given electrical shocks
  • A female confederate was present
  • Men who expected severe rather than light shocks thought the woman was more attractive!
  • –> Misattribution of physical arousal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the matching hypothesis?

A

Goffman 1952

Relationship aspiration = desire for goal + perceived probability of goal attainment
This theory argues that we seek relationships with others that we think are of a similar attractiveness to ourselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the different types of love?

A

According to Aronson 1952, there are different types of love; passionate and companionate.

Passionate
•	Intense longing
•	Physiological arousal
•	Feelings of great fulfilment and ecstasy when reciprocated 
•	New romantic relationships/ Limerence 
Companionate
•	Intimacy and affection
•	Deep care for the other
•	Not necessarily passion or arousal in their presence 
•	Mature romantic rel’ships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Sternberg’s triangular theory of love?

A

Sternberg 1986

There are three components; commitment, passion and intimacy.

Intimacy and passion leads to romantic and passionate love.

Intimacy and commitment leads to companionate love.

Lastly, commitment, passion and intimacy leads to consummate love.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do ideas of marriage differ across countries?

A

Our ideas of love are culturally informed, they are not objective.

In Europe, before this last century it wasn’t very typical to marry someone out of love. People married because they were expected to work well together in a relationship.

In some Asian cultures, the idea of marrying without love isn’t alien at all. You take the advice of your parents, and you marry someone who you think you’re going to be able to form a successful union with in the long run.

17
Q

What is the difference between love reported in year 1 and a decade later for arranged and love marriages?

A

For arranged marriages, the satisfaction in the beginning tends not to be so good but 10 years later it’s much higher. They found the opposite for love marriages. People were very satisfied to begin with but stopped being satisfied in the long run.

This may have something to do with expectations, for those going into an arranged marriage people may have very low expectations and end up pleasantly surprised. Whereas if you’re madly in love you expect it to be amazing forever but most people are difficult to love with.

18
Q

How many marriages end in divorce?

A

Feldman 1998

In the UK, roughly half of all marriages end up in divorce.

Historically, throughout the decades divorce has become more prevalent (not always the case). This may be due to shifting social norms, as divorce is more accepted now. Furthermore, women in heterosexual relationships are not as financially dependent as before.

19
Q

What are the different predictors of marital dissatisfaction?

A
  • Neuroticism
  • Sensitivity to rejection - people that are sensitive to criticisms
  • Lower SES - people have more stresses in low SES areas, this puts more demands on your partner and can cause overwhelming feelings.
  • Financial and work-related problems
  • Negative attribution patterns - attributions being explanations people have for someone’s else’s behaviour. Some people have chronically negative attribution patterns, so every time something happens, they look for ways to attribute it to something negative. There are different patterns e.g., negative global patterns like assuming people are forgetful people after one occasion of them forgetting something.
  • Marrying at young age
  • Lack of conflict-management styles
20
Q

What beliefs contribute to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships?

A

Zagefka & Bahul, 2021

  • Mindreading expected
  • Belief in destiny
  • Aversion to disagreement

The literature suggests that if you expect your partner to have mindreading abilities (expecting them to know what you want without having to verbalise it) there are detrimental effects. However, in this particular study this finding couldn’t be replicated.

The belief that you were meant to be together and that you don’t have to work on the relationship since it’s due to fate has been linked to relationship dissatisfaction (but also could not be replicated in this study).

Aversion to disagreement is when people feel uncomfortable about conflict and think it’s best not to talk about it in fear of upsetting people. People who have a higher aversion for disagreements and who believed that signs of disagreement meant there was something wrong, tended to have less happy relationships. Disagreements are a very normal thing in relationship.

21
Q

How is the way that couples interact be a powerful predictor of dissatisfaction and divorce

A

(Gottman & Levenson, ’92)
The way couples interact can be a powerful predictor of dissatisfaction and divorce
Harmful behaviours:
• Criticism
• Defensiveness
• Stonewalling (refusal to deal with problems)
• Contempt
93% predictive accuracy over 14 yrs in Indiana study  they can predict divorces that happen as long as 14 years away.

22
Q

What does Rusbult’s (1980) model of relationships look at?

A

They looked at why women who get repeatedly beaten up by their partners do not leave. One explanation is that there are a lack of alternatives and nowhere else to go.

There are four factors that are important when trying to explain commitment.

  • Rewards
  • Alternatives
  • Investments
  • Satisfaction
23
Q

Explain the four factors that are important when trying to explain commitment according to the model of relationships (Rusbult, 1980)

A
  • Rewards
  • Alternatives
  • Investments
  • Satisfaction
  • The first factor is rewards, (also mentioned in the social exchange theory). There may be financial rewards, help with childcare, social esteem if their partner is well regarded.
  • The second is whether they have any viable alternatives, often people break-up when someone else comes into the scene.
  • The higher the previous investments into the relationship, the greater the reluctance to leave. This also depends on someone’s age, e.g., young people may have low investments into their relationships whereas an older couple that have been married for several decades with children and a mortgage have much higher investments into the relationship.
  • Lastly is satisfaction, how people feel about their relationship will inform whether they are committed to stay or not.