Friedland Flashcards
Identify 4 stakeholders of reinsurers that require sound estimates of unpaid losses.
- Internal Management
Pricing, underwriting, strategic planning and financial decision making - Investors
Evaluate reinsurer’s balance sheet and income statement when making investment decisions - Regulators
Appropriate evaluate a reinsurer’s financial - Rating agencies
Issue strong financial ratings.
If a reinsurer experiences significant adverse development, it risks rating downgrade. This may make the reinsurer look less attractive to primary insurers.
Define bordereau
Detailed report of insurance premiums or losses affected by reinsurance.
Reinsurers often receive data by bordereau from cedants or the brokers of their cedants.
Describe the 5 primary reasons ceding companies purchase reinsurance
- Promote Stability
Reinsurance stabilizes the loss experience of ceding companies from YtoY by retaining smaller, more predictable claims and ceding larger, more unpredictable claims. - Increase Capacity
Reinsurance allows ceding company to assume more risk by ceding a portion of all of their policies or by ceding their larger policies. By increasing its capacity through reinsurance, pedants may be able to write quality accounts that are otherwise unattainable. - Protect Against Catastrophe
Reinsurance protects ceding companies from a single catastrophic loss event as well as multiple large loss events. - Manage Capital & Solvency Margin
Reinsurance passes risk from the pedant to the reinsurer. - Access Technical Expertise
Reinsurers can lend their expertise in the areas of underwriting, marketing, claims and pricing to insurers seeking to enter new lines of business or new regions.
Briefly define Treaty Reinsurance
Under treaty reinsurance, pedant enters into a contract with one or more reinsurers to cede all business from certain lines of business, subject to the retentions and attachment points specified in the treaty.
Reinsurer is not involved in the UW of the underlying policies written by the cedant.
Briefly define Facultative Reinsurance
Primary purpose of facultative reinsurance is to increase a pendant’s capacity by ceding large risks.
UW risk for the reinsurer is reduced under facultative reinsurance since reinsurer can conduct its own underwriting.
Briefly describe hybrid contracts
Some contracts include both treaty and facultative characteristics.
Ex: Facultative Automatic and Facultative Obligatory treaty
Briefly describe Facultative Automatic hybrid contract
Bordereau of risks ceded is submitted to the reinsurer, which has limited rights to decline individual risks
briefly describe Facultative Obligatory Treaty
Treaty under which the pedant has the option to cede or not cede individual risks. The reinsurer must accept any risks that are ceded.
Briefly describe Proportional Reinsurance
Under proportional reinsurance, the reinsurer typically pays a ceding commission to the pedant to reimburse for acquisition and UW expenses associated with issuing the underlying policies.
2 common types of proportional reinsurance:
1. Quota Share
2. Surplus Share
Briefly describe Quota Share treaty
Ceding company cedes to reinsurer and agreed % of each risk it insures that falls within LOB(s) subject to reinsurance contract.
In return, reinsurer receives fixed % of premium and losses for all risks ceded to QS agreement.
Briefly describe Surplus Share treaty
Unlike QS, surplus share does not have a uniform cession % across risks. Instead, the cedant cedes the surplus amount of risk above its retained line subject to a maximum ceded percentage and limit.
The retained line is the amount the pedant is willing to retain per risk.
The reinsurer’s share is expressed as a multiple of the pedants retained line.
Reinsurer’s share is expressed as a multiple of the pedants retained line.
State 3 typical uses of proportional reinsurance
- Manage capital and solvency margin (net premium-to-surplus ratios are typically improved)
- To increase capacity
- To protect against catastrophes
Briefly describe non-proportional (XoL) reinsurance
Non-proportional reinsurance can be written on a treaty or facultative basis.
Unlike proportional reinsurance, premium paid to reinsurer is not proportional to the limits of coverage.
Reinsurer pays for all losses above specified retention, subject to any specified limits.
Common types include XS per risk, XS per occurrence, catastrophe, annual aggregate XoL and clash reinsurance.
Briefly describe XS per risk reinsurance
Reinsurance indemnifies the cedant against the amount of loss in XS of a specified retention subject to specified limits on a per risk basis.
Typically used to protect property exposures and increase capacity.
Often includes ceding commutations, but those comm provide less surplus relief to the cedant because the reinsurance premium tends to be significantly less.
Briefly describe XS per occurrence reinsurance
Protects a cedant from an accumulation of losses due to a single occurrence.
The subject loss under XS per occ reinsurance is the sum of all losses arising from an insured event for all subject policies. This means insure’s retention only comes into play once rather than for each individual risk.
Briefly describe catastrophe reinsurance
Indemnifies the cedant for the accumulation of losses in excess of a specified retention arising from a single catastrophic event or a series of events, subject to a specified limit.
It is a special case of XS per occurrence reinsurance.
Briefly describe Annual Aggregate XS of Loss (Aggregate Stop-Loss) reinsurance
Total losses to the cedant cannot exceed a specified annual threshold (expressed as either a percent of premium or fixed dollar amount).
Typically used to protect net results (reinsurance kicks in after other contracts have already been applied) and protect insurer’s capital base.
The issue with this type of reinsurance is that it is often unavailable or very expensive.
Defin Clash reinsurance
Attaches above all other policy limits and is meant to cover exceptional events where traditional reinsurance contracts will not fully reimburse a cedant’s claims. This can occur when a cedant received multiple claims from multiple insureds arising out of the same catastrophe.
A clash event has 3 components:
1. Loss must arise out of multiple policies held by one insured or similar policies held by multiple insureds.
2. All damages must be traceable to a specific event
3. The event must take place in its entirety within specific timeframe
Explain why ceding commissions might provide less surplus relief for non-proportional reinsurance vs proportional reinsurance.
Ceding commissions are stated as a % of premium. It is often the case that non-proportional reinsurance premiums are less than proportional reinsurance premiums. The ceding commissions are smaller as a result.
Briefly describe policy limit restatements and reinstatement premiums.
Restatement: in the event of a full limit loss or some other amount specified in the reinsurance contract, cedants can obtain a restatement of the reinsurance policy limit.
Reinstatement premium: if a restatement requires an additional premium to be paid by the cedant to the reinsurer, it is known as a reinstatement premium.
Explain what is meant by reinsurance contract A inures to the benefit of reinsurance contract B
In this case, reinsurance contract A is applied first and reduces the loss subject to reinsurance contract B
Briefly describe finite risk reinsurance
Multi-year contracts that spread risk over time and take into account the investment generated over the period.
Describe 4 features of finite risk reinsurance
- Risk transfer and risk financing combined in a multi-year contract
- Emphasis on the time value of money with investment income explicitly included in the contract
- Limited assumption of risk by the reinsurer
- Sharing of the results with the cedant
Describe a loss portfolio transfer
A LPT is a form of reinsurance that transfers all or a portion of a cedant’s loss reserves present at a specific accounting date to a reinsurer.
Often used by cedants to withdraw from a specific line of business while meeting their obligations to policies they already wrote (timing is main element of risk)
Reinsurers could lose money on an LPT contract in the event that claims are settled faster than expected, resulting in less than anticipated investment income.
Describe adverse development cover
Alternative to an LPT where the cedant receives reimbursement from the reinsurer for losses in XS of a pre-agreed retention level.
Reserves are not transferred under these covers.
These covers are often used for M&A to transfer the risks of timing and adverse reserve development.
Describe 2 ways in which reinsurance covers claims
- Losses-occurring-during coverage
Provides reinsurance coverage for all losses that occur between the contract inception and expiration date regardless of when the cedant issued the underlying policy that resulted in the loss - Risks-attaching coverage
Provides reinsurance coverage only for those policies that began during the reinsurance contract effective period.
Briefly describe subscription policy
Policy in which multiple reinsurers share a risk subject to corresponding subscription %.
Useful ways for primary insurers to reduce credit risk by diversifying reinsurer pools.
Briefly describe commutation clause
Under a commutation, the reinsurer pays the present value of reinsurance recoveries not yet due to the cedant in exchange for full termination of all future obligations related to the reinsurance contract.
The commutation clause, lays out the terms and conditions for the estimation, payment, and discharge of all obligations of the parties to a reinsurance contract for the purposes of a commutation.
4 reasons why a cedant might pursue a commutation
- To exit a LOB or geo region
- To manage reserves for transfer or sale
- To avoid the credit risk associated with its reinsurer, especially if the reinsurer has experienced a ratings downgrade
- To better manage claims claims-related expenses
3 reasons why reinsurer might pursue a commutation
- To end a relationship with a cedant that is in runoff or one with which it no longer conducts business
- To protect itself from the potential insolvency of the cedant
- To avoid disputes when there are significant differences of opinion with respect to future loss development of subject losses
4 reasons why understanding commutations is important for the reserving actuary
- Actuaries are often involved in the analysis of reinsurance contracts that are subject to commutation
- Commutations affect the estimation of unpaid ceded losses. Thus, a ceding company’s actuary should be aware of commuted contracts.
- Commutations eliminate the corresponding liability to the reinsurer. Thus, a reinsurer’s actuary should also be aware of commuted contracts.
- Loss development patterns for commuted contracts could be different from con-tracts that remain in-force.