Freedom of Expression Flashcards

1
Q

First Amendment

A

The government may neither censor all categories of speech nor engage in content-based discrimination among different categories of speech (even if that speech is offensive), with some exceptions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A
  • The government will face strict scrutiny if it engages in content-based discrimination
  • To win, gov’t would have to show the regulation is necessary and serves a compelling gov’t interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Unprotected Speech

A

Regulation of unprotected speech is permissable

HAFWOUD

Hostile Audience

Fighting Words

Obscene speech

Unlawful action

Defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hostile Audience

A

Speech that elicits imminent violent response against the speaker by a crowd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fighting Words

A

To fall within this category, the speech must be more than annoying or offensive; there must be a genuine likelihood of imminent violence by a hostile audience.

Requirements:

  1. Direct personal insult
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Obscene Speech

A

For speech to be considered obscene, the following three-part Miller test must be satisfied:

  1. the average person, applying contemporary comunity standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals tothe prurient interest (a national standard is not used);
  2. the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
  3. the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value (note that a national standard is used to determine this value).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Unlawful Action

A

Gov’t can prohibit the speech if the speaker intends to produce imminent unlawful action; and the speech is likely to produce imminent unlawful action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Defamation

A

Constitutional restrictions apply to defamatory speech where the plaintiff is either:

  • a public official or public figure, or
  • where the defamatory statement involves a matter of public concern.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Plaintiff is private person & subject matter is of private concern

A

standard defamation law applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Plaintiff is private person & subject matter is of public concern

A

Plaintiff must prove negligence about the truth or falsity of the statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Plaintiff is public official or public figure

A

plaintiff must prove:

  • the state law requirements of defamation AND
  • actual malice (knowledge of the falsity or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the statement)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Commerical Speech

A

Commercial speech is protected by the First Amendment if:

  • it is not false or deceptive and
  • does not relate to unlawful activity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When can gov’t regulate commerical speech?

3 part test

A
  1. it must serve a substantial governmental interest;
  2. it must directly advance the substantial governmental interest; and
  3. it must not be more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sexual or Indecent Speech

A

Is protected but can be regulated on the basis of secondary effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Secondary Effects Regulation Requirements:

A
  1. regulations must serve a substantial government interest, and
  2. leave open reasonable alternative channels of communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conduct regulation, creating an incidental burden on speech

A

Is allowable, if:

  • The regulation furthers an importance gov’t interest that is unrelated to the content of the speech
  • The incidental burden imposed on the speech is no greater than necessary
17
Q

Time, Place, and Manner Regulation

A

Reasonable regulation of the time, place, or manner of speech is allowed.

18
Q

3-part test is used to determine the constitutionality of time, place, or manner regulations

A
  1. be content-neutral as to both subject matter and viewpoint (i.e., the regulation cannot prefer some messages over others);
  2. be narrowly tailored to serve a significant (important) government interest; and
  3. leave alternative channels of communication open.
19
Q

Non-public forum

A

gov’t can regulate non-public forums under rational basis review

20
Q

When can an individual be denied public employment based upon membership in a political organization?

A

When the position is a high-level policy-making position

21
Q

Requirements for denying an individual public employment for political association

A

An individual may be deprived if:

  1. he is an active member of a subversive organization;
  2. such membership is with knowledge of the illegal aims of the organization; and
  3. he has a specific intent to further those illegal ends (e.g., violent overthrow of the government).
22
Q

Oath requirement for public entry

A

The gov’t can require employees to take an oath to:

  1. Support the constitution
  2. Oppose illegal overthrow of the gov’t
23
Q

Public employees can be disciplined or fired for speech if:

A
  1. The speech is not a matter of public concern
  2. Speech is potentially disruptive of the workplace
24
Q

Vagueness

A

Statute void for vagueness if it fails to provide a person of ordinary intelligence with fair notice of what is prohibited

25
Prior restraints on speach in advance of its expression
• Invalid unless there is a **particular harm** to be avoided and certain **procedural safeguards** are provided to the speaker, for example o Narrowly drawn/reasonable/definite standards o Promptly sought injunction o Prompt/final decision on validity of restraint • Burden on government to prove censored material not protected speech
26
Campaign related speech
* Statutes limiting campaign contributions subject to intermediate scrutiny * Restrictions on campaign expenditures on communications during election campaign regarding a candidate subject to strict scrutiny
27
Government speech
**7.** **Government speech** • Need not be viewpoint-neutral, but is subject to the Establishment Clause
28
Regulation of media's right to publish matters of public concern
Regulation of right to publish matters of public concern subject to strict scrutiny
29
Media Gag Orders
Subject to prior restraint analysis and rarely upheld
30
Attending Trials for media/public
Right to attend may be outweighed by overriding interest that can’t be accommodated by less restrictive means
31
Media have right to protect source?
no constitutional right
32
Broadcast rights
Greater responsibility to public, thus more closely regulated than print and other media