free movement of goods II Flashcards
can national restrictions be justified?
in certain circumstances
in certain circumstances, free movement rights can be restricted in compliance with EU law, if …
a. for discriminatory or distinctly applicable restrictive measures, a derogation ground expressly provided for in the TFEU can be engaged;
b. for indirectly or non-discriminatory, that is, indistinctly applicable restrictive measures, an overriding requirement relating to the public interest that is capable of justifying a restriction of the fundamental freedoms established by the Treaty can be demonstrated; and
c. In both cases, the restriction also satisfies a proportionality test, that it, it is demonstrated to be both appropriate and necessary for achieving the relevant public interest objective
when can national restrictions that are caught by art 34 still be justified?
if they pursue a legitimate aim (protect a public good)
what are the two types of permissible restrictions?
art 36 TFEU
mandatory requirements - case law
what is art 36 available for?
all national measures, including discriminatory measures
not for arbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade
under art 36 what are the grounds that national restrictions can be justified by?
- public morality
- public policy
- public security
- protection of the health and life of humans, animals or plants
- protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value
- protection of industrial and commercial property
where does the burden of proof lie when relying on article 36 justifications?
with the member states that have infringed article 34
is the application of article 36 automatic?
no
CJEU will assess whether a measure falls within the scope of article 36 and will apply the general principle of proportionality to the measure in place
when are mandatory requirements available?
only for MEQR that are not discriminatory
where does the burden of proof lie for mandatory requirement?
with the member state
what is recognised under mandatory requirements post Cassis?
protection of environment - Commission v Denmark
pluralism of the press - Familiapress
freedom of expression and assembly - Schmidberger
there is a non-exhaustive list - the courts may recognise new mandatory requirements
what is the proportionality test for a national measure?
two step test
1. suitability - is the measure appropriate to the aim? Does it contribute to achieving the aim pursued?
- necessity - can the justification that is invoked by a MS be achieved with less restrictive means?