EU Law Supremacy Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

In the founding treaties of the EU is supremacy mentioned?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where was the doctrine of supremacy established?

A

by the court of justice of the EU in its case law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

in what case can the earliest definition of supremacy be seen?

A

Van Gend en Loos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the court conclude in Van Gend en Loos?

A

not that EU law is supreme but that national law is no longer at the top of the hierarchy

member states have limited their national sovereignty for the benefit of the European Community

this established direct effect rather than supremacy

recognised EU as a new legal order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was concluded in Costa v ENEL - second milestone judgement

A

established the doctrine of supremacy of EU law

Court told us that the EEC created its own legal system - own institutions, own legal personality and legal capacity

the COJ tells us giving preference to the unilateral and subsequent measure of one of these national governments or one of these national parliaments that goes against EU law cannot stand

member states have limited their sovereign rights creating a new body of law which binds nationals and themselves

sovereignty of EU takes priority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was concluded in Internationale Handelsgesellschaft (IHT)?

A

that EU law has supremacy even over national constitutional law
protection of fundamental rights forms part of the general principles of EU law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was concluded in the Simmenthal Case 1978?

A
  • existing incompatible domestic law is automatically inapplicable
  • precludes valid adoption of new national legislative measures incompatible with EU law
  • conflicts of law are to be settled by EU law, not domestic law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the two approaches to constitutionalism?

A

constitutional monism
constitutional pluralism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the two levels that the approaches to constitutionalism can operate at?

A

descriptive and normative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the descriptive claim of constitutional monism?

A

according to constitutional monism all law and political power of a given territory derive in some ultimate sense from a single and ultimately hierarchal source of constitutional authority

that territory’s sovereign people and their constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the normative claims of constitutional monism?

A
  • singular source of constitutional authority in any given legal system
  • hierarchy - legal and political authority must derive from one ultimate source
  • rules from this source trump all other rules
  • demos - one people must form one state on the basis of one constitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the CJEU say about the European Union in terms of constitutionalism?

A

that it is a constitutional legal order
EU law has supremacy over national law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the monist argument of the member states?

A
  • that there is ultimate authority in state territory
  • constitutional law of member states is hierarchically superior to non-constitutional legal order of the EU
  • member state = masters of the treaties
  • no European constitutional demos
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the descriptive claims of constitutional pluralism?

A
  • no single authority (supreme and final)
  • no supreme interpreter in cases of conflict
  • heterarchy
  • two legal orders are co-equal, co-existent, interactive, overlapping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the normative claims of constitutional pluralism?

A
  • constructive dialogue as a means of resolving conflict
  • openness, mutual respect, accommodation of difference
  • views plurality of actors and changes in legal terrain as an opportunity for interaction and integration
  • democratic legitimacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what cases show evidence of constitutional pluralism?

A

Omega [2004]
Grogan [1991]