FRE: Hearsay Flashcards

All ILT info in.

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

6 Exceptions to the rule against hearsay

A
  1. Admissions of party
  2. Former testimony
  3. Statement against interest
  4. Dying declaration
  5. Spontaneous statements (6 exceptions)
  6. Business records
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Six types of spontaneous statements

A
  1. Present state of mind in issue
  2. Statement of existing intent to prove intended act.
  3. Excited utterance
  4. Present sense impression
  5. Declaration of PRESENT physical condition
  6. Declaration of past physical condition.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Admission of a party

“Statement of an opposing party”

A

Declaration of a party offered against the party.

So statement of P against D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Vicarious Admission

A

Statement by the party’s agent concerning a matter w/i the scope of the agency, when made during the existence of the relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Former testimony

A

Admissibility requires:

  1. Meaningful opportunity to cross; and
  2. Unavailability of the declarant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statement against interest

A
  1. Declarant is unavailable
  2. Statement is against that person’s monetary, proprietary, or penal interest,
  3. At the time the STATEMENT WAS MADE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Limitation on statement against interest

A

A statement that:

  1. Tends to expose declarant to criminal liability and
  2. is offered in a criminal case by either the prosecution or defense

MUST be supported by CORROBORATING CIRCUMSTANCES that clearly indicate its trustworthiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Statement against interest v. Admission

A
  1. Statement against interest must be against interest AT THE tIME IT WAS MADE.
    (Admission: Against interest at the time of the trial.)
  2. Statement against interest may be made by anyone.
    (Admission: Only by the party)
  3. Statement against interest requires personal knowledge.
  4. Statement against interest requires unavailability.
    (Admission: Party is USUALLY there)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dying declaration

A

Statement made:

  1. Under sense of an impending death.
  2. Need not die, but must be UNAVAILABLE at time of trial.
  3. Only admissible in homicide or civil case
    (In IL ONLY in homicide case)
    4.Content MUST concern cause or circumstances of impending death.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Excited utterance

A

To be admissible:

  1. Must be a startling event
  2. Made under the stress of excitement
  3. Concerning the facts of the startling event.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Present sense impression

NOT A HEARSAY EXCEPTION IN ILLINOIS

A

A statement:

  1. Describing or explaining an event or condition
  2. Made while declarant was perceiving the event; or Immediately thereafter.

NO exciting event needed.
NO appreciable time lapse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Declaration of PRESENT pain, suffering, or physical condition

A

A declaration of a then existing physical condition is admissible to show the condition. “It hurts!”
Admissible by anyone who hears it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Declaration of PAST physical condition

A

Must be:

  1. Made to medical personnel, and
  2. Be pertinent to either the diagnosis or the treatment.

FRE: Even if the diagnosis is only for the purpose of giving testimony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Preliminary questions of fact upon which admissibility depends.

Concerning the qualification of a witness:

A

Shall be determined by the court (judge) - but court is not restricted by the rules of evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Impeaching hearsay declarant

A

Credibility of the declarant may be attacked by any evidence which would be admissible for that purpose if declarant had testified as a live witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Business records exception

A

Records made:

  1. At or near the time,
  2. By a person with knowledge,
  3. ARE ADMISSIBLE IF:
  4. kept in the regular course of business, AND
  5. if it was the regualr course of business to make the record.
17
Q

2 Questions to ask when thinking about business record exceptions:

A
  1. Is the record germane to the business?

2. Would the employee normally be able to testify to this?

18
Q

state of mind hearsay exception

A

Declarations of existing state of mind are admissible

(i) when declarant’s state of mind is directly in issue, or
(ii) if they are declarations of intent offered to show subsequent acts of the declarant.

19
Q

present sense impression

A

describes an event or condition happening contemporaneously with or immediately prior to the statement.

20
Q

To qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule, a statement against interest must meet the following requirements: (4)

A

(i) The statement must have been against pecuniary, proprietary, or penal interest when made.
(ii) Declarant must have had personal knowledge of the facts.
(iii) Declarant must have been aware that the statement is against her interest and she must have had no motive to misrepresent when she made the statement.
(iv) Declarant must be unavailable as a witness.

21
Q

The catch-all hearsay exception has three requirements:

A
  1. the statement must have “circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.”
  2. The statement must be more probative as to a material fact than any other evidence which the proponent can reasonably produce so that the “interests of justice” will be served by its admission.
  3. Finally, the proponent must give notice in advance of trial to the adverse party as to the nature of the statement.