FORMULATING HYPOTHESIS Flashcards

1
Q

must be a controlled procedure

A

INTERNAL VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

presence vs absence
amount or degree
category

A

LEVEL OF IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CONFOUNDING

A

problem if there is no random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

observable operation, procedures, measurements in context of an experiment.

A

OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION

A

definition of the cited info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explains the precise meaning of IV; describe exactly what was done to create various treatment conditions of experiment.

A

EXPERIMENTAL OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

unseen processes to explain behavior; provided definitions involving variables that can be observed.

A

HYPOTHETICAL CONSTRUCTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

agreement between measurements of same responses from different observers.

A

INTERRATER RELIABITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

comparison of scores who have been measured twice with the same instrument.

A

TEST - RETEST REALIABITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

measures internal consistency; measures single construct variable

A

INTERITEM RELIABILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

actually studying the variables that we intend to study.

A

VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

provides evidence to validity of an experimental procedure

A

MANIPULATION CHECK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

measure what it intends to measure

A

FACE VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how content of our measure fairly reflect the content of the quality we are measuring

A

CONTENT VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ability of the instrument to predict future behavior based on the score they obtained.

A

PREDICTIVE VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

whether scores on a measuring device correlate with scores obtained from another method.

A

CONCURRENT VALIDITY

17
Q

transition from theory to research application

A

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY

18
Q

test result should highly correlate with scores on tests measuring same construct

A

CONVERGENT VALIDITY

19
Q

test result should not highly correlate with scores on tests measuring other constructs.

A

DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY

20
Q

type of prob in internal validity wherein factors that are note the focus of the expe can influence the findings?

A

EXGTRANEOUS VARIABLES

21
Q

type of prob in internal validity wherein it sabotages an experiment, ext. variable changes systematically across diff conditions of expe

A

CONFOUNDING

22
Q

proposed by Donald Campbell; all quasi-experimental studies contain one or more classic threats

A

CLASSIC THREATS TO INTERNAL VALIDITY

23
Q

type of threat where it involves an outside event that happened before the experimentation; which can cause the experimental effects.

24
Q

internal changes in subjects; studies that take months/ yrs to finish

A

MATURATION

25
effects on the DV produced by previous administration of the same test/ other measuring instrument.
TESTING
26
type of threat that happens when some features of the measuring instrument changes during experiment
INTRUMENTATION
27
regression towards the mean; extreme scores tend to have lest test - retest reliability; issue w/ d result
STATISTICAL REGRESSION
28
type of threat where researchers does not assign subjects randomly to diff conditions of the experiment.
SELECTION
29
happens when occurence of subjs dropping out of the experiment.
SUBJECT MORTALITY
30
occurs when selection threat combines with another threat
SELECTION INTERACTION