Forms Of Utilitarianism Flashcards
Define Multi-level Act Utilitarianism
Act utilitarianism as the criterion of correctness (right), with rules of thumb to aid in simplifying the decision procedure which are generally the right responses to a situation but have no inherent value as principles in themselves and can be disregarded when necessary
Define Act Utilitartianism in its most basic form
An act is only right if it produces at least as much overall happiness or more than any other possible action
Define Rule Utilitarianism in its most basic form
An act is only rights if it confroms to a rule which generally leads to the greatest happiness
How does Mills approach character
Although never mentioned directly, rather than believing in certain character qualities he would most probably believe one should have the character which results in one performing those actions which maximise happiness
OR
a character which itself maximises happiness
Define Actualism
Perspective held by Mills:
Taking account of only what actually happens - the right action is only that which ACTUALLY produces the greates possible happiness
Define Actualism
Perspective held by Mills:
theory of righness doesn’t directly effect how we should do the right thing practically
Taking account of only what actually happens - the right action is only that which ACTUALLY produces the greates possible happiness
So long as a medical procedure with a 1% chance of success does succeed and it improves the quality of life, it is the morally right action
What is the alternaqtive to Mills Actualism?
Probablism - theory of righness doesn’t directly effect how we should do the right thing practically
Takes the probability into account for rightness - what the agent is justified in believing at the time the action occurs
welfare outcome x probability of succeeding = goodness
Positives of adopting Probabilism
possible response to consequences which stretch into the future (Hitler’s ancestor example)
Negatives of adopting probabilism
Unintended good and bad consequences cancel eachother out
the ‘tendency of actions’
Mills argues for act utilitarianism but bases this on generalised rules, making reference to secondary principles
IMPORTANT: no inherent good in these rules do not morally absolve you if you choose wrong
Demandingness Objection
if all that matters is maximising overall happiness, and your happiness only counts as much as anyone else’s, then pursuit of others happiness could outweigh development of personal projects/ relationships - Mills undersells the commitment asked of utilitarianism
Why the demandingness objection is wrong
The Sheriff example - any example which seems to go against utiltiarianism actually doesn’t because of long term cause/effect
example of the sheriff
The sheriff can either kill an innocent or allow a riot which would kill many- mill would say keep the rule and don’t kill innocent, seems to go against act utilitarianism but actually doesn’t
Define Supererogatory Actions
actions which go beyond the call of duty
Why supererogatory actions are not relevent to utilitarianism
Mills isn’t interested at this point in what is deserving of punishment and whether it is punishable wrongness -
he is interested in analysing the notion of wrongness itself???
Mills also sees punishment as something which should maximise utility - what can be learned from the blame of an individual (objection: paternalistic, no moral standard)