Forms Of Business Organization - mod 11 Flashcards
Law of agency
- an area of commercial law dealing with a set of contractual, quasi-contractual and non-contractual fiduciary relationships that involve a person, called the agent that is authorized to act on behalf of another called the principal to create legal relations with a third-party
Agency
- results in a legally binding agreement between the principle and third party
- agency is an exception to the doctrine of privity
2 contractual relationships
- Main contract - between the principle and third party
2. Agency agreement- between the principle and agent
3 classes of agents
Lecture
- employees
- partners
- independent contractors
Textbook
- universal agents: hold broad authority to act on behalf of principle (lawyer)
- general agents: hold a more limited authority to conduct a series of transactions over a continuous period of time
- special agents: are authorized to conduct either only a single transaction or a specified series of transactions over a limited period of time
The agency agreement may cover:
- the scope of authority
- The duties to be performed
- the fees to be paid
Agency is usually created by contract
Actual authority
- actual authority is the authority an agent actually has
- two kinds: express and implied (or usual) actual authority
- an agent is only entitled to protection from the principal if they have an acted within the scope of their actual authority, and if they act outside of that authority they may be in breach of contract, and liable to a third-party for breach of the implied warranty of authority
Apparent authority
- apparent authority is the authority an agent appears to have
- also called ostensible authority, exists where the principle’s words or conduct would lead a reasonable person in the third-party’s position to believe that the agent was authorized to act, even if the principal and the purported agent had never discussed such a relationship
- If a principal creates the impression that an agent is authorized but there is no actual authority, third parties are protected as long as they’ve acted reasonably
- this is sometimes termed agency by estoppel or the doctrine of holding out, where the principal will be estopped from denying the grant of authority if third parties have changed their position to their detriment in reliance on the representations made
Apparent authority comes from
- the words or deeds of the principle (not the agent)
Liability of agent to third party
- if the agent has actual or apparent authority, the agent will not be liable for acts performed within the scope of such authority, as long as the relationship of the agency and identity of the principal have been disclosed
- when the agency is undisclosed or partially disclosed, however, both the agent and the principal are liable
- where the principal is not bound because the agent has no actual or apparent authority, the purported agent is liable to the third party for breach of the implied warranty of authority
Liability of agent to principal
- if the agent acts without actual authority, but the principle is nevertheless bound because the agent apparent authority, the agent is liable to indemnify the principal for any loss or damage
Liability of principal to agent
- if the agent has acted within the scope of actual authority given, the principal must indemnify the agent for payments made during the course of the relationship whether the expenditure was expressly authorized or merely necessary in promoting the principal’s business
Ratification
- if an agent exceeds their actual or apparent authority the principle can “ratify” or adopt the agreement
- ratification may occur by conduct (i.e bank gives you the loan)
Unnamed principal
- if the principle is unnamed (i.e. anonymous), then the agent has no apparent authority
Undisclosed principle
- if the principle is undisclosed (i.e. it is unknown there is a principal), then the contractual relationship is between the agent of the third party
Duties of the agent:
- fiduciary (best interests): highest duty in law, breach of trust, agent must act in best interest of principle
- duty of care (act reasonably): negligence may result
- contractual (honour the contract): agent must honour contract with the principle
Duties of the principle:
- contractual (honour the contract, pay the agreed upon fees)