formation of a contract Flashcards
what is the difference between and offer and an invitation to treat
an invitation to treat is negotiable and an offer is a clear offer
Gibson v Manchester city council
council told gibson house may be prepeared to sell the house to you. invitation to treat not offer.
Storer v Manchester City Council
storer received a communication from the council where the leter included words which showed it was an offer not an invitation to treat.
legal principle - a legal binding was made when the council got in contact with him
this case outlines offer is an expression of willingness to a contract on specified terms
With the intention that it is to be binding once accepted
exams may ask you to talk about the reasonable man test -
what are advertisements usually classed as
an invitation to treat unless it is a unilateral contract.
what is the case that sets the precedent of an invitation to treat via advertisements
Partridge v Crittenden
partridge v Crittenden
d was charged for offering a wild live bird which goes against the laws that protects birds. He had placed a an advertisement. he was found not guilty.
Legal princple – advertisement was seen as an invitation to treat and not an offer.
fisher v bell
a knife was displayed with a price in a shop to offer this is an offence against offensive weapon acts. d was found not guilty
legal principle - goods in a shop window are an invitation to treat not an offer
Pharmaceutical society of great Britain boots cash chemists
boots were charged with selling pharmaceutical products not under staffs supervision. however it was a self select shelf which then the pharmacy had to sell to the customers.
boots were found not guilty as the offer was made by the customer which the pharmacist had to approved
Legal principle - self check out is means offer was made by the customer which pharmacist had to approved Legal principle
auction
the bidder is the one to make the offer that teh auctioneer then acccepts or denies by the banging of their hammer. this means lots at an auction are are invitation to treat
British Car auctions v wright
auctioneers were prosecuted for offering to sell a unfit vehicle. However it was an invitation to treat not an offer.
harvey v Facey
farm. harvery wanted to buy a farm and asked for the lowest price.
legal principle - Request for information is not an offer
what contracts in advertisements are offers and not an invitation to treat.
unilateral contracts
what is a unilateral contract
if the person chooses to perform the act there will be a legal binding.
a one sided contract agreement in which an offeror promises to pay only after a completion of a task by teh offeree.
Carlill v Carbolic smoke ball
unilateral contract - the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, placed an advertisement in a newspaper for their products, saying whoever purchases and uses their product but still contracted influenza despite properly following the instructions would be entitled to a £100 reward.
legal priniciple - uniliteral contracts are performed based onif bthe person chooses to peform the act, there will be a binding unlitaral contract.
bilateral contract
requires both offeror and offeree to do something both have obligations
who can offers be made by
they can be made by anyone, to anyone a group of people or to the whole world they can also be made through machines and electronice via emails also a notice
Thornton v Shoe lane parking
mr thornton put money in the machine and got a parking ticket the offer was made by the machine on half of the company.
legal principle - acceptance was made by putting the money. whis was where the contract was made. terms displayed.
acceptance
when can an offer be made
An offer can be made when the offer is still open. t is essential to establish when the offer started and when it ends.
when does the offer start and when does it end
the offer strats when it is communicated to the offereee. communication is key
Key case for acceptance
Taylor V Larid
taylor gave up being a captain on the ship. He needed to get bcak to england so he decided to work s an ordinary crew memeber but recieved no wages for this. he did not get paid due to not communicating with the ship owner.
legal principle - clear communication needed for offer