Forgetting II Flashcards

1
Q

why are we motivated to forget?

A
  • environmental cues bring to mind traumatic memories
  • forgetting is beneficial
  • retain a positive outlook towards life: positivity bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

positivity bias

A
  • tendency to recall more pleasant memories than either neutral or unplesant ones
  • increases over the lifespan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

positivity bias study: Charles, Mather, and Carstensen (2003)

A

Charles, Mather, and Carstensen (2003)

task:
- younger and older adults viewed pictured of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant scenes
- recall the pictures - after 15-minutes delay

result:
- older adults recalled about twice as many positive than negative images
- recognition, however, was equal for both positive and negative images

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why does positivity bias increase with age?

A
  1. as wer get older our focus:
    - shifts away from future goals
    - maintain a sense of well-being
  2. older people are more skilled in emotion regulation:
    - goal-driven moniitoring
    - evaluating, altering and gating (letting in or out) emotinoal reactions and memories
    - better control of what we remember

motives alter what we remember and we get better at it with age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

motivated forgetting terminology

A

Repression: (Freud)
- psycological defense mechanism aimed at rejecting
- keeping out of consciousness
- repressed material still influences behaviour
- unconscious

supression:
- conscious process
- intentional, goal directed
- “intentional forgetting”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Psychogenic amnesia

A
  • profound forgetting
  • psychological in origin
  • often triggered by trauma
  • lacks observable neurobiological basis
  • memory for public events and general knowledge often remain intact
  • ability to form new memories intact

possible mechanism:
extreme psychological distress -> involuntary suppression retrieval in relation to certain stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

limit encoding

A

way to control what we remember
- look away from stimulus
- focus on pleasant aspects
- stop elaborative thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

prevent retrieval

A

way to control what we remember
- intentionally shift to new thought
- avoid cues/reminders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

stop retrieval

A

way to control what we remember

in the face of a reminder
- actively suppress the unwanted memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Directed Forgetting: Item Method

A

Basden and Basden (1996)
Directed forgetting is observed on:
- recall tests
- recognition tests

effect reflects differences in episodic encoding (instuction before encoding)
- remember instructions: elaborative
- forget instructions: release attention

suggested “forget” instruction engages an active process that disrupts encoding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

encoding suppression

A

active process adopted at encoding and restrict which experiences we allow into memory
- RT evidence + fMRI evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why do we need encoding suppression?

A
  • regulates which experiences will be allowed into memory
  • life has difficulties -> reducing the footprint of negative experiences is always good
  • bias in remembering more positive than negative characteristics about oneself, but matched when relating to another (Sedikides & Green, 2000)
  • regulate memory to protect self image
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Directed Forgetting: List-Method

A

learn new list - interference with old
Geiselman, Bjork & Fishman, 1983

instruction to forget: (after encoding)
costs - forget instructions impair recall of items from first list
benefit: reduce proactive interference expected on the second list

differences in retrieval, not encoding
- disappear in recognition tests
- appear in implicit tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

naturalistic diary study

A

task:
- students recorded 2 events/day in a diary for 1 week
- 1 group asked to forget previous weeks entries and focus on new events in second week
- 1 group asked to remember events from 1st week and new events in second
- recall events from both weeks

results:
the forget group had relatively poorer memory for
- first week events
- example items that neither group thought they would have to recall
- both negative and positive mood events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Retrieval inhibition hypothesis - mechanism of list method directed forgetting

A

forget instructions inhibit list 1 items
- reduces the activation of unwanted memories
- however they remain available

representing forgotten items restores their activation levels
- explains why items can be recognized but not recalled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

context shift hypothesis - mechanism of list method directed forgetting

A

forget instructions mentally separate list 1 and list 2 items
- the mental context shifts between the lists
- list 2 context lingers into final test
- new context is a poor retrieval cue for list 1 items

may involve inhibition of the unwanted content

17
Q

context shift hypothesis study: Sahakyan and Kelley, 2002

A

context shifts led to worse recall of a former list (even without forget instruction)

  • part of the directed-forgetting effect arises from as shift in mental context
18
Q

Inhibitory control: Behaviour/action control

A

the ability to initiate, discontinue, or prevent motor actions based on goals

Go/No-Go Task:
measures inhibitory control over action
- press a button whenever a letter appears on the screen
- if the letter is an “X” (rare) withhold the response

19
Q

inhibitory control: cognitive control

A

the ability to flexibly control thoughts in accordance with our goals - includes ability to stop unwanted thoughts from entering mind

Think/No-think task:
- measures inhibitory control over memory
- can people use inhibitory control to prevent unwanted memory?

20
Q

think/no think paradigm

A

total control effect:
- think>no think
- intentional control yields lasting retrieval consequences

positive control effect:
- think > baseline
- reminders without intention to suppress facilitate memories

negative control effect:
- no think > baseline
- reminders with intention to suppress inhibit memories

21
Q

memory suppression (think no think)

A
  • suppression increases with more suppression trials per event
  • replication with various stimulus combos
  • suppression occurs with neutral and unwanted memories, but unclear if emotional memories are more/less suppressible
  • after a single suppression forgetting lasts at least 24 hours
  • people with diminished cognitive control show less suppression induced forgetting
22
Q

inhibitory control and PTSD - Catarino et al., 2019

A

is inhibitory control impaired in PTSD

hyp - PTSD patients will be less able to suppress

results:
- suppression was diminished in the PTSD group conpared with the control group
- retrieval suppression was most compromised in people with the most severe symptoms

23
Q

spontaneous recovery (memory)

A

the re-emergence of a previously extinguished conditioned response after a delay in classical conditioning (Pavlov)
- increases with time, though rarely returns to full strength
- suffers diminishing returns with increasing recovery/extinction cycles
- occurs in conditioned emotional responding
- the stronger the initial memory, the more likely to recover

24
Q

why do memories recover spontaneously?

A

if retroactive interference reflects inhibition of responses that had previously been relevant:
- forgotten memories recover when inhibition is gradually released

  • MacLeod and Macrae found that inhibition appears to decrease over time
  • retrieval induced forgetting is significantly reduced after a 24 hour delay
25
Q

repeated retrieval attempts study - Ballard, 1913

A

task:
- children memorised poems
result:
- successive recall attempts led to recalling previously forgotten ones
conc:
- people often display reminiscence - remembering again the forgotten without relearning
- could be gradual after multiple attempts

26
Q

hypermnesia

A
  • improvement in recall arising from repeated testing sessions on the same material
  • increases with more recall tests
  • largest effects on free recall, but also appears for cued recall and recognition

can be considered a condition

Erdelyi and Kleinbard -
arises from visualisation and reconstruction

27
Q

Hypermnesia study - Erdelyi & Kleinbard, 1978

A

task:
- studied 40 pictures or words
- repeatedly tried recalling items over a week
results:
- recall improved over testing days
- reversed forgetting curve
- larger effects for pictures that less imageable words
conc:
- hypermnesia arises through visualisation and reconstruction

28
Q

Cue Reinstatement

A

biasing attention away from certain aspects of experiences can lead to forgetting of the unattended elements
- but encountering the right cue can lead to memory recovery

29
Q

cue reinstatement study - smith and moynan, 2008

A

results:
- without cues memory for non-reviewed categories was impaired
- providing the category cues eliminated the forgetting effect
- true for negative as well as neutral memories

conclusion:
- selectively avoiding reminiscing about memories can cause forgetting
- but can be overcome given the right reminders

30
Q

avenues of memory recovery

A

suggestive therapy
- may reflect therapists suggestions
- lack corroborative evidence

spontaneous recovery
- more likely to be genuine
- more likely to be corroborated