Forgetting Explanations - retrieval failure + Eval Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is retrieval failure

A

the inability to access memories from LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

even though LTM duration and capacity are potentially unlimited why does retrieval failure take place

A

there are no cues to trigger recollection of memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the cue theory known as

A

Encoding Specificity Principle (ESP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who came up with the ESP

A

Tulving and Thompson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the ESP

A

memories are most efficient in the presence of cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are cues

A

anything present during the encoding of memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tulving and Pearlstone (1966)

A

= participants learn 48 words
- G1 = no cues (free recall) 40%
- G2 = cues recall 60%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tulving and Pearlstone conclusions

A

therefore RF is more likely during the lack of cues - especially ones with a meaningful link)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Context and State dependent cues

A

someone’s emotional state / environment may act as cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contextual scenario cues

A

any kind of contextual situation present during encoding = cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State dependent cues

A

similar mental state may prompt memory retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

state dependence (Goodwin et al)

A

2 states
drunk and sober
4 conditions
1. learn sober - recall sober
2. learn sober - recall drunk
3. learn drunk - recall drunk
4. learn drunk - recall sober
found 1 best yet 3 =second best
consistent mental state = best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Eval = good

A
  • wide range of supporting research
    lab = clear cause and effect
    field = real life scenarios - ecological validity
  • applicable - exams
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Eval = bad

A
  • cues effectiveness = questionable
    more meaningful info ‘outshines’ simple cues
  • ESP is not falsifiable - lacks scientific methodology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Supporting research - context cues

A

Abernethy = students tested in 4 different conditions
1 = tested usual teaching room same teacher
2 = usual room different teacher
3 = different room same teacher
4= different room different teacher
same room / teacher = best results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Supporting research - environmental cues

A

Godden and Baddeley = scuba divers learn and recall word list
1 = learn on land recall on land
2 = learn on land recall underwater
3 = learn underwater recall on land
4 = learn underwater recall underwater
best results = consistent environment

17
Q

what is the relationship between Interference and Retrieval Failure

A

RF occurs
interference disappears when there is a presence of cues - proves that information is never permanently lost but temporarily unavailable (I) however when there are cues info more likely recalled (no RF)