Forgets Flashcards

1
Q

IRR rule if - CFS front/back loaded

A

front
IRR> r
back
IRR< r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

IRR assumes

A

all FCFs reinvested at IRR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MIRR 3 different approaches

A

Discounting
- disc all -CFS back to 0
Reinvestment
- put all CFS but CF0 forward to end
Combination
- both disc - CFS to 0 and put all other Cfs forwards to end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

NPV and IRR give same decision BUT

A

mutually exclusive (CFo and timing very different)
non-conventional CFs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Payback Period problem

A

NPV could be -

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PI helpful when

A

funds are limited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dep Tax Shield

A

Tc x Dep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 techniques for comparing mutually exclusive projects with different lives and which method to use

A

LCLife
NPV Perpetuity
Equivalent Annul Cost

  • identical r give all same
  • diff r use NPV perp first, LCF and NPV give different and then never use EAC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

scenario vs sensitivity analysis

A

sensitivity is effect of change of one avr and scenario is whole bunch of assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What about NPV at accounting BE?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Acct vs Finc BE

A

when net profit=0
sales when NPV=0 or IRR=r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

real and financial options represent ____ to __( end part diff for each)

A

the right but not obligation to
real: take some action in future
finc: purchase something in future for price set today

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 real options

A

expand, delay, abandon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what 4 things need to be true for options analysis to exist in real investment analysis

A

flexbility
uncertainty
learning
irreversibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 limitations to real options

A

increase capital investment values which increase agency risk
assumes perfect foresight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

goal for capital structure

A

minimize WACC, maximise firm value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

business risk

A

equity risk arising from nature of firms operating activities and is directly related to systematic risk of firms assets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

financial risk

A

equity risk arising from capital structure of firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

when earnings perform good and and with debt and what is BE

A

good: EBIT> BE pt
bad: EBIT< BE pt

BE pt: EPSu=EPSl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

why lev increases ROE if ROA>Rb

A

as ROA measures how efficiently a company’s assets can generate profits.
if RA>Rb it means the company is earning more from its investments than it is paying in interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Homemade leverage

A

Unlev + Lev
Not paying int but want to, Shint gonna be -
Borrow D/E of shares owned money from bank at same rate as firm and use to buy shares
CF going to be EPSU x new number shares (more than before) - SH int

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

De-lever

A

Lev + de-lever
Paying int but don’t want to so going to receive int
Sell D/V shares and put those into bank at same rate as firm
CF going to be EPSL x new shares owned(less) + SHint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

MM1,2,3

A

value, Rs, WACC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

MM1,2,3 with and without taxes

A

without
1
Vu=Vl, cap structure/debt is irrelevant
2
Rs is increased with D as shareholders need compensating
3
WACC u=WACC l=Ro
with taxes
1
Vl= Vu+ TcB (dtax shield), debt increases value of firm
2
cost of eq to lev firm is cost of unless firm plus risk premium
3
lev firm WACC is lower as increased value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Int tax shield
Rb x D x Tc
26
D/E to D/V
D/E/ 1+ D/E
27
D/V to D/E
D/V/ 1-D/V
28
2 critiques of MM props
personal tax disadvantage of debt makes corp tax advantage ineffective borrowers incur side costs of debt (bankruptcy costs and agency costs of debt) which can offset value of int tax shield
29
who bares future costs of bankruptcy?
shareholders
30
3 selfish strategies shareholders take and why?
underinvestment - shareholders would be wanted to put more money in so that increased debt holder value take large risk higher risk - -NPV projects destroy value to bondholders milking it out - pay out extra divs to decrease value to bondholders
31
2 ways to decrease agency costs of debt
repurchase debt prior to bankruptcy increase return to bondholders
32
trade-off theory of debt
trade-off between PV debt tax shield and costs of financial distress
33
optimal cap structure is ___ but firms are
static dynamic
34
debt 2 adv and disadvand their implications
adv - tax benefit (lowers taxable income), higher Tc higher advantage -reduced agency costs equity, increases cost of equity: FCF possible wasteful managers, makes them work harder , as sep between stock and managers increase, benefits ti using debt increase disadvantage - agency costs of debt(shareholders being sneaky), firms where lenders have control over how monry used should be able to borrow more - bankruptcy costs, firms with more stable earnings and lower bankruptcy costs should borrow more
35
MM and personal taxes
with Gain lev= TcB if TPs=TPb without Gain lev=0 if (1-Tc)(1-Tps)=(1-Tcb)
36
classical tax system
double taxation favours corp debt many outcomes depending on individuals tax rate and D/E ratio
37
imputation tax system
Tc=0 corporate profits are taxed at the corporate level, but the tax paid by the corporation is credited to shareholders when they receive dividends no tax adv of debt eq income oney taxed at personal tax rate debt is not attractive
38
if management know Veq
they will issue shares and @announcement investors learn so SP decreases
39
pecking order theory
ret earnings (cheapest), debt, equity
40
according to pecking order theory what should happen on announcement of debt
negative impact on SP
41
according to pecking order theory if internal CF> cap investment
surplus used to pay debt
42
3 conflicts of pecking order theory with trade-off theory
no target D/E profitable firms use less debt firms like financial slack and like to have cash readily avaliable
43
factors in D/E ratio
taxes type of assets uncertainty of operating income
44
When to use APV, FTE, WACC
APV when level of debt is known FTW when large levered firms WACC most common
45
working out D+S=V in APV
APV becomes V and D is amount of loan
46
APV and floatation costs
minus from loan amount and then add PV of Fcost tax shield so each years amont x Tc present values
47
NPVF of loan
+ in year 0 of loan, - AT int payments each year - principal loan at t
48
NPV all eq if depreciation is risk less
- price + EBTD x (1-Tc) x PVIFA + PV Deep tax shield(Dep x Tc x PVIFA), remember to disc dip tax shield at diskless rate
49
4 financing side effects
tax subsidy to debt costs of issuing new securities costs of financial distress subsidies to debt financing
50
3 ways to value a firm with debt
APV, FTE, WACC
51
NPVF for 3 diff financing side effects
tax subsidy to debt = PV (int tax shield) costs of issuing new securities = NPV (floatation costs) subsidies to debt financing = NPV (loan)
52
in a non-perpetual analysis FTE approach
LCF= UCF- AT financing expense at t LCF will be UCF- AT financing expense -loan discount LCF at levered Rs calc Rs by V=APV year0 - debt amount from initial years 1-t normal CF- at int payment year t -off whatever the loan amount
53
equity value can __ but debt __
flucuate can't
54
in a perpetual analysis FTE approach
net income/Rs (net income being Earning after interest after depreciation)
55
WACC method
discount UCF at WACC
56
scale enhancing project
similar to those of firms existing assets
57
non-scale enhancing project
different area
58
Asset B
B0=Ba=Bunlev
59
Equity B (lev B)
Beq=Bs
60
Beta infos with and without corp taxes
without Bd=0 with Bs>Bunlev
61
Bs is __ related to lev of firm
+
62
pure play
de-lever Bs to get Bo for PP using PP D/E re-lever Bo using D/E of projects firm
63
Opportunity cost
value of the best alternative forgone where, given limited resources, a choice needs to be made
64
Nominal CFs
actual dollar amount received
65
Real CFs
refers to CF purchasing power
66
after 1st year abandon project if __ and sales Q of this
PV of FCFS< selling amount equate PV FCFS to abandon value and solve for q
67
Net income for a firm with debt
EBIT- Int (Rb x D)
68
what happens to S.O in a share repurchase
decreases
69
return of divs
divs/owns stocks
70
increase in value of a firm with int
PV int tax shield (B x Rb) x Tc
71
value to shareholders/ of equity after payments to debt holders
is residual value after paid debt holders
72
make stockholders indifferent to debt holders increasing payment make
E(Ve) low vloatility= E(Ve) high volatility and make high vol one have x in it
73
promised vs expected return to debt holders
face value/MV debt - 1 expected value debt/MV debt -1
74
How to work out how many shares currently held will need to purchase a new share?
RI terms: shares on issue/number new shares
75
RI terms
1:16 or 16 means can buy one extra for every 16 held Shares on offer/ number rights given out (number of shares held to be entitled for a right)
76
n and r in theoretical value of a right formula
n is RI terms (number of shares held to obtain a right) r additional shares offered for each right (2:1 offering 2 for every 1 so additional is 2)
77
RI shareholder wealth after
bought RI x shares owned number of shares (new number shares owned x Pex) - (number shares bought x sub price)
78
RI options if or if not rennouncable
if : can sell their rights to maintain wealth level if not: prefer whichever plan decreases SP by littlest as RI can dilute shareholder wealth
79
Winner's curse
Profit if UV and OV = no shares*(UV amount)-no shares*(OV amount) but then UV only recieve half
80
Cash offer with x required sale proceeds
X*(1-UW %)=Raise
81
main reason to lease
tax deductibility of lease payments
82
operating vs financial lease
operating like a rental agreement, lessor still own and maintain lessee pay payments, can cancel, not fully amortised financial, lessor doesn't maintain more flexibility for them, fully amortized, lessee becomes owner at end
83
2 types of financial lease
sale and lease back leveraged lease
84
4 conditions for a financial(capital lease)
PV lease payments > 90% of Mv of asset Bought by lessee at end lease life>75% of assets life lessee has a bargain purchase option at expiry
85
2 things i forget for NAL
discount at after tax cost of debt if paid at start of year lay out which years are what for accurate PVIFA/discounting
86
lessor req payments
amount to be amortized= initial outlay- PV AT salvage- PV deep tax shield and amount amortized= PV AT lease income which = PVIFA x AT annual lease payment so lease payment =AT lease /(1-tc)
87
debt displacement and lease
The reduction in a company's ability to borrow because it leases its assets. debt displacement occurs when a company receives income from its leases, it prevents the company from using those assets as collateral for a loan. if lease not use as much debt as if borrowed to buy lend more to purchasing firms as they are using more debt capacity s can cover from int side of things
88
when to carry more debt under purchase option
AT CFs buy> AT lease payments
89
the NAL= ? when firms indifferent to buy or lease
NAL=0
90
recognise residual dividend policy
it is if CAPEX< EPS and any div, not if other ways round and paying div as investment funding would require more than earning so should not be any divs paid should all go to capex
91
recognise smoothed dividend policy
div payout ratio equal ish Payout: Div per share/EPS
92
recognise stable dividend policy
stable stream of dollar dividend payments, which are expected to increase over time in line with permanent increases in firm earnings. if EPS increasing and Div per share makes sense
93
low regular plus extra policy
pay low stable amount to give shareholders consistent income then extra if doing well
94
in finc206 does share repurchase change shareholder wealth
no as can sell shares for 46 or keep shares worth 46 as SP doesn't change
95
prefer extra div or shares repurchase
shares repurchase keeps SP high and gives options to sell or keep
96
MM irrelevance theory
dividend policy is irrelevant , payin div or issuing new shares DOESN"T change shareholder wealth or firm value
97
ex div day
owners on or after won't receive div
98
typically share price falls by
less than div amount due to taxation
99
div policy is trade-off
between retaining earnings for investment or paying out divs and issuing new shares to replace cash paid out
100
gain in div income for shareholders is
offset by loss of capital gains
101
in div imputation system how much does SP fall by?
> tan div due to value of franking credit
102
in div imputation system firm essentially
pays tax on div income on behalf of shareholder
103
non-tax relevance of div policy (
info signalling current income prefs div stability decrease in agency costs share issue cost for firm transaction costs for investors clientele effect ( firms adopt div payout policy for which there is excess demand)
104
Pcum
share price just before stock pays div
105
Current return for shareholders
(Divs(x growth rate maybe)/Shares) + growth rate
106
value of target firm to acquiring firm
number of shares outstanding times the price per share under the new growth rate assumptions
107
gain from acquisition
value of the target firm to the acquiring firm minus the market value of the target
108
NPV acquisiton
value of the target firm to the acquiring firm minus the cost of the acquisition
109
Max acquiring firm pay per share
value of the target to the acquirer divided by the number of target’s shares
110
share price in merged firm
MVA + value of B to A / Shares A+Shares B
111
for a stock offer to be equivalent to cash offer
set the value of the share exchange offer equal to the value of the cash offer: Vab*h= cash offer shareholders of target would be equally well off if they received this % of stock in new company
112
Ownership % of target shareholders in new firm
Ownership %= new shares issues/ (new shares issues+ current shares of acq firm)
113
exchange ratio
The exchange ratio is the number of shares of acquiring firm offered for each share of target firm Exchange ratio = New shares issued/ Existing shares in target firm
114
increase eco of scale
spread FC over more units
115
increase eco of scope
benefits from enhancing breadth of g/s
116
7 motives for acquisition
synergy creation, economic gain operating synergies financial synergies revenue enhancement cost reduction tax gains reduced capital requirement (disposal of duplicated fixed cap/WC)
117
CCC formula and each formula
Inv day+ A/R days- A/P days Inv days: Inv/ave daily COGS A/R A/R/ ave daily sales A/P A/P/ave daily COGS
118
commitment fee you pay on
unused portion pay int on total not fee then pay fee on unused
119
compensating balance
hold % in acct so only receive amount-holding pay int on full and maybe on balance too payback= (borrowed total+int)- (holding+holding int)
120
loan % IR 2 things
pay/recieved-1 and EAR it
121
if it says compensating balance on face value
amount + fees / (1-%)
122
123
Cfs for NPVF floatation cost loan/tax subs
if not loan just PV after-tax int payments floatation cost year 0 - float cost other years inc at end + float cost tax shield loan year 0 + loan given years 1-t -after tax int payments t inc after tax int payments, - principal pay back of loan