Forensics: Cognitive explanations (levels of moral reasonings + distortions) Flashcards

1
Q

Who created levels of moral reasonings?

A

Kohlberg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are levels of moral reasonings?

A

A series of progressively more logically consistent stages. An individual uses their own value system to think about whether an action is right or wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Kohlberg’s theory about levels of moral reasonings?

A

Criminal offenders are more likely to be classified at the preconventional level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 levels of moral reasonings?

A

Level 1: Pre-conventional
Level 2: Conventional
Level 3: Post-conventional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the pre-conventional level?

A
  • Right and wrong determined by rewards/punishment
  • Stage 1: Whatever leads to punishment is wrong.
  • Stage 2: The right way to behave is the way thats rewarded.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the conventional level of morality?

A
  • Views of others matter. Avoidance of blame: seeking approval.
  • Stage 3: Behaving in ways that conform to ‘good behaviour’.
  • Stage 4: Obedience to authority. Importance of ‘doing one’s duty’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the post-conventional level of moral reasoning?

A
  • Abstract notions of justice.
  • Stage 5: Difference between moral and legal right. Recognises some rules should be broken.
  • Stage 6: Individual principles of conscience. Takes account views of everyone affected by a moral decision.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the method of Kohlberg’s study on levels of moral reasonings?

A

Conducted a longitudinal study over a period of 12yrs

  • 75 young American males aged 10-16 at start of study and aged 22-28yrs by end.
  • Compared USA to Canada, UK, Mexico, Turkey and Taiwan.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the findings of Kohlberg’s study?

A
  • Found criminals have a lower level of moral reasoning than others.
  • Criminals don’t progress from pre-conventional level.
  • Serious offenders have a moral outlook that differs from that of the law-abiding majority.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are AO3 points of Kohlberg’s study?

A
  • Kohlberg showed his moral stages were universal as he also looked at Britain, Mexico etc.
  • Development was slower in non-industrial countries.
  • Sample was based off of males, suggesting an issue of beta bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are supporting studies for Kohlberg’s theory?

A

Hollin (2002) - criminals are most likely to be at the pre-conventional stage.
Palmer and Hollin (1998) - Offenders showed less mature moral reasoning than less delinquent people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can levels of moral reasoning be applied to the real world?

A

Understanding how low moral reasoning is associated with offending behaviour can be useful in shaping intervention or treatment programmes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AO3 points on levels of moral reasonings?

A
  • Supporting evidence: Hollin, Palmer and Hollin, Kohlberg.
  • Sampling issues and generalisation due to Kohlberg’s focus on males.
  • Cultural bias (Western bias)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is cognitive distortions?

A

Faulty, irrational ways of thinking which can cause individuals to perceive themselves, others or the world inaccurately, and usually negatively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are cognitive distortions in the case of criminals.

A

In the case of criminal behaviour - these distortions lead to offenders denying or rationalising their behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two main factors of cognitive distortions?

A
  1. Hostile attribution bias

2. Minimalisation

17
Q

What is hostile attribution bias?

A
  • What we think when we observe someones action and inferring what their actions mean.
  • People may be perceived as being confrontational when they’re not.
  • E.g. ‘He’s giving me a funny look’.
18
Q

What is minimalisation?

A
  • Downplaying the seriousness of an offence.

- ‘Euphemistic labelling’, e.g. burglars are just “doing a job” or “supporting their family”.

19
Q

What study supports hostile attribution bias?

A

Wergrzyn (2017) - Hostile Faces

20
Q

What was the hostile faces study?

A
  • 62 males - 30 violent criminals, 15 history of sexual abuse in children and 17 controls.
  • Shown 20 ambitious faces: 10 male and 10 female and asked rate fear and anger.
21
Q

What are the results of hostile faces study?

A

Violent criminals shown to have a hostile attribution bias as they rated the faces as angry more often than control and sexual abused.

22
Q

What study shows minimalisation?

A

Barbaree (1991): showed it to be common among sexual offenders.

23
Q

What was the Barbaree study?

A

Among 26 incarcerate rapists, 54% denied they had committed an offence at all and 40% minimised the harm they had caused the victim.