Forensic psychology AO1+AO2 Flashcards
How is offender profiling used?
Offender profilfing aims to identify the person resposible based on the idea that key charateristcis of an offender can be deduced from the characteristics of the offence and the particulars of the crime scene.
What is offender profiling?
An investigative tool used by the police when solving crimes
* Aims to narrow down the list of suspects
* careful scruitiny of crime scene
* anaylisis of other evidence
Hypothesis about the offenders :
* Age
* Background
* Occupation
* Characteristics
What is the top down approach?
An American approach originating in the US as a result of the work carried out by the FBI.
* Conducted interviews with 36 sexually motivated serial killers
* Determined that data could be split into 2 categories : Organised and Disorganised
* From those categories certain predictions can be made
* Profilers gather data and then assign to a category
→Typology Approach
What are organised and disorganised types of offenders?
The organised and disorganised distinction is based on the idea that serious offenders have certain signature ‘ways of working’. These generally correlate with particular sets of psychological characteristics that relate to the individual.
What does an Organised offender look like?
- Evidence for planning
- have a type
- high levels of control
- Tidy - no clues of evidence
- above average intelligence
- skilled/professional employment
- socially and sexually competent
- Married, possibly with kids
What does a disorganised offender look like?
- Little evidence of planning
- Spontaneuous spur of the moment
- Little control
- Crime scene reflects impulsivity
- Below average intelligence
- Unskilled work or unemployed
- History of sexual/relationship dysfunction
- Lives alone/close to the crime scene
What are the 4 main stages in constructing an FBI profile?
1. Data assimilation
2. Crime scene classification
3. Crime reconstruction
4. Profile generation
Describe the stages in involved in constructing an FBI profile?
- Data assimilation
- Reviewing evidence
- Crime scene classification
- Crime reconstruction
- Hypothesis in terms of sequence of events, behaviour of victim and suspect
- Profile generation
- Hypothesis relating to the likely offender
What is a strength of using cateogries to identify the offender?
**There is support for a disticnt organised categoryy of an offender **
Canter et al. (2004) analysed 100 US murderers by different serial killers using the smallest space analysis
* Statsitcial method identifies behavioural correlations
* The study examined 39 aspects of serial killings, such as torture, body concealment and weapon use.
The results revealed a susbset if features aligning with the FBI’s organised offender typology, suggesting that this aspect of the approach has some validity
What is a weakness of using cateogries to identify the offender?
Many studies suggest that the organised and disorganised types may not be mutually exclusive
* Maurice, (2002) - It is difficult to classify killers as one or the other type
* Could have multiple contrasting characteristics
* High intelligence and sexual competence, but commits a spontaneuous murder leaving the body at the crime scene
Could mean that the typology is more of a continum rather, than one or another
What is a strength of the top-down approach?
A strength of the top-down approach is that it can be adapted to other crimes
Meketa(2017) reported that the top-down approach had been recently applied to burgulary →85% rise in solved cases
* Organised and disorganised remain
* Interpersonal and oppurtunistic have been added
Suggests that the approach has wider application than was originally assumed
What is a weakness of the top-down approach?
Flawed evidence
The top-down approach was based on interviews conducted with 36 murderers (25 serial killer)
* Then classified as either disorganised or organised
* sample is poor
* Unrepresentative
* Not randonm or large
* No standard questions →no comparisson possible
* Self report may not be the ideal given the sample
All suggests that the top-down approach does not have sound scientific basis
What is the bottom-up approach?
The aim is to generate a picture of the offender that does not use fixed typologies. Profilers work up from evidence collected at the crime scene to develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics, motivations and social background of the offender.
What is meant by investgative psychology?
An attempt to apply statistical procedures and psychological theory to the analysis of crime scenes.
* Aim is to establish patterns of behaviour that we are likely to occur across crime scenes
* Creation of a databases, as a baseline
* Details of a crime can then be matched to the database -> same offender?
What is involved in 5-Factor model?
- Interpersonal coherence
The way the offender behaves at the scene/with the victim is the same with other people in their lives ( Dwyer 2001 - Types of Rapists) - Time and Place significance
Location could be significant to the offender , possibly indicating where they live or work - Criminal Characteristics
How the crime has been commited suggests aspects about the offenders’ characteristics - Criminal Career
How offenders crime may differ due to experience - Forensic Awareness
Behaviour could indicate that they have been involved with the police in the past
What is Geographical profiling?
Uses information about the location of linked crime scenes to make inferences about the likely base of an offender.
What is involved in geographical profiling?
- Assumes locations are not random; A sense of spatial consistency meaning offedners will stick to a certain area > centre of gravity becomes clear
- Least effort principle : Multiple equal potential locations to commit the crime, offenders most likely to choose the one closest to a home base
- Distance Decay : the number of crimes will decreases further away from the offender’s base. However, there is a ‘“buffer zone” immediatley around the home base to avoid detection/recognition.
- Circle theory (Canter & Larkin, 1993) offenders operate according to limited spatial mindset crimes radiate out from their home base creating a circle
How does the distribution of offences allow us to describe offeders?
- Marauder
-operates in close proximity to home base - Commuter
- Travelled a distance from their usual residence
What is Jepoardy Surface?
This is a more complex version of criminal-geographic targetting suggested by Rossmo ( 1997)
* Creates a 3D map where offenders’ base may be
* Includes geographic data and features in the environment, such as rivers, lakes etc
What is a strength of Investigative Psychology?
Evidence for Investigative Psychology
One strength of investigative psychology is that evidence supportsits use.
* Canter and Heritage (1990) conducted an analysis of 66 sexual assult cases. The data examined using smallest space analysis and several behaviours were identifed as common in different in samples of behaviour, such as the use of impersonal language and lack of reaction to the victim
* Each individual displayed a characteristic pattern of such behaviours, and this can help establish whether two or more offences were commited by the same person
This supports one of the basic principles of investigative psychology, that people are consistent in their behaviour
What is a strength of geographical profiling?
**Strength : Evidence for geographical profiling **
Lundrigan and Canter (2001) collated information from 120 murder cases involving serial killers in the US. Smallest space analysis revealed spatial consistency in the behaviour of the killers.
- The location of each body disposal site created a centre of gravity,
- Offenders start from their home base they go in different directions each time they dump body, but in the end this creates a circular effect around the home base.
- The offenders base was invariably located at the centre of the pattern
- Especially with marauders.
This supports the view that geographical information can be used to identify an offender.
What is a weakness of geographical profiling?
Strength : Geographical information is insufficent
As with investigative psychology, the success of geographical profiling may be reliant on the quality of data that the police can provide.
- Recording of crime is not always accurate; Can vary between police forces; estimated 75% of crimes are not even reported to the police in the first place.
- Makes us question the use of an approach that relies on the accuracy of geographical data.
- Critics also claim that other factors are just as important in creating a profile, such as the timing of the offence and the age and experience of the offender (Ainsworth 2001)
This suggests that geographical information alone may not always lead to the successful capture of an offender.
What is a weakness of the bottom-up approach?
Weakness : Mixed results
The success rates for offender profiling and the views of police forces who have used the techniques suggest that what profiling can’t reliably do is identify an offender.
- It is a tool for narrowing down possibilities, not one that provides exact answers.
- There is a danger is sticking too closely to the profile.
- Rachel Nickell – stabbed 47 times and sexually assaulted on Wimbledon Common in 1992.
- Profile led to the wrong man being arrested.
While an offender profile can be helpful in narrowing down possibilities it must be used with great caution to avoid wrongful arrest and convictions.
What is the Atavistic approach?
The Atavistic approach is an early biological explanation for criminal behaviour advanced by Ceasare Lombroso