Forensic Psychology Flashcards
The Problems in Defining Crime
Culture (where). Historical Context (when). Age (who).
Culture as a problem in defining crime
What is considered a crime in one culture may not be considered a crime in another. For example, in the UK it is illegal to have more than 1 wife, whereas in the Philippines this is legal.
Historical context as a problem in defining crime
What is considered a crime at 1 point in time may not be considered to be a crime at another. For example homosexuality in the UK is now legal whereas prior to 1967 it was an illegal offence.
Age as a problem in defining crime
At what age are people responsible for criminal actions? For example a 2 year old child should not be prosecuted for picking up a packet of sweets and walking out of a shop without paying for them. In the UK the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years.
Ways of measuring crime
Official Statistics. Victim Surveys. Offender Surveys.
Official Statistics
Government records of the total no. of crimes reported to police and recorded in the official figures. These are published by the home office every year. Allows the govt to develop crime prevention strategies and policing initiatives as well as to direct resources to those areas most in need. Officially recorded crime is affected by police recording rules which can vary between police forces.
Reasons why crimes are not reported
There is no victim. Too trivial. Can’t be bothered to. Mistrust police. Perpetrator is friend/family.
Reasons why crimes are not recorded.
Insufficient time. Crime too trivial. Not a priority. Victim withdraws charge. Lack of evidence. police recording rules.
Research on recording crime
Farrington and Dowds 1985 - Found that Nottinghamshire police were more likely to record thefts of less than £10 value in contrast to Staffordshire and Leicestershire police forces.
Victim Surveys
Record people’s experience of crime over a specific period. The Crime Survey for England and Wales asks people to document the crimes they have been a victim of in the past year. Each person is interviewed using a fixed set of questions. 50,000 households are randomly selected. Published on an annual basis.
Offender surveys
Involves individuals volunteering the details of the no. and types of crimes they have committed. These tend to target specific groups of likely offenders based on ‘risk’ factors such as previous convictions, age social background etc. The Offender Crime and Justice Survey which ran from 2003-6 was the 1st national self-report offender survey in the UK. As well as measuring offending, it looked at indicators of repeat offending, trends in offending, role of co-offenders. The OCJS involved interviewing 10-25 year olds about anti-social behaviour and drug use in a longitudinal study.
Evaluation of Official Statistics
Practical Application - Allows govt to direct resources to tackling specific crime in certain areas. Not reliable figures - Only shows those crimes that are recorded, People may not report crimes.
Evaluation of Victim Surveys
Reliance on memory - as seen in memory topic, EWT is not very accurate. More Accurate than official statistics - Highlights crimes that are not reported to the police.
Evaluation of Offender Surveys
How many people - Offer insight into the no. of people responsible for certain offences as a small group or single individual may have committed many crimes. Unreliable - Individuals may conceal crimes they have committed or exaggerate them for bravado. Targeted nature of the survey means that types of crimes such as burglary are over represented as opposed to corporate crime such as fraud.
Offender profiling
A method of working out the characteristics of an offender by examining the characteristics of the crime and crime scene. Aim is to generate hypotheses about the probable characteristics of an offender.
The different approaches to offender profiling
UK = Bottom up US = Top down.
The Top-down Approach
Concerns matching what is known about the offence and offender to a pre-existing template. Originated in the US as a result of the FBI’s interviews with 36 sexually motivated serial-killers. Offenders are classified in one of two categories.
Categories of the top-down approach.
Organised. Disorganised.Based on the idea that serious offenders have a certain modus operandi which correlate with a particular set of social and psychological characteristics that relate to the individual.
Crime Scene Characteristics of an Organised offender
Evidence of planning. Victim is a stranger. Controlled conversation. Use of restraints. Removes weapon from the scene. Body is hidden.
Likely personality and behaviour of an Organised Offender
Average to high intelligence. Socially competent. Skilled employment. Sexually competent. Living with partner.
Crime Scene Characteristics of an Disorganised offender
Little to no evidence of planning. Victim is known. Little conversation. Leaves evidence - blood, semen etc. Little use of restraint. Body in open view.
Likely personality and behaviour of a Disorganised offender.
Below average intelligence. Socially inadequate. Unskilled employment. Sexually incompetent. Lives alone and close to crime scene.
4 main stages to constructing an FBI Profile
Data Assimilation - Profiler reviews evidence. Crime scene classification. Crime reconstruction - hypotheses in terms of sequence of events, behaviour of the victim etc. Profile generation - hypotheses related to the likely offender.
Research on Top-Down Approach
Canter 2004. Used info from 100 murders by 100 Serial Killers in the USA. Statistical technique ‘smallest space analysis’ was used to test for the co-occurrence of the 39 variables that distinguish between organised and disorganised. Found that organised characteristics were typical of most serial killers. Disorganised characteristics were much rarer and not frequent enough to be considered a type.