Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

EU law > FMOG > Flashcards

FMOG Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

What are Goods

A

Com v Italy

“products that can be valued in money and which are capable of forming subject of commercial transactions”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a QR: Geddo v Ente Nazionale Risi

A

“Measures which amount to a total or partial restraint of imports, exports, or goods in transit”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Quantitative restriction examples

A

R v Henn & Derby - UK did not allow sexually explicit material, absolute ban on entry = QR

ex. Parte Hedley Lomas - not granting export licence = QR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rosengrad & Others

A

state monopoly is not automatically a QR

but will be a QR if there is no counter-balancing obligation (like allowing individuals to request state to buy for them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a MEQR? Commission’s View

A

Can be found in (no-longer applicable) Dir/70/50

- includes max/min prices, hindering purchases, payment conditions, etc.,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a MEQR? Courts view

A

Dassonville
“all trading rules capable of hindering trade, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade”

  • discriminatory intent is not required
  • “rule of reason” established (reasonable restraints are not caught by art.34)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Categories of MEQR:

A

DISTINCTLY APPLICABLE - discriminates as a matter of law

INDISTINCTLY APPLICABLE - two forms
a) INDIRECTLY discriminatory - discriminates as a matter of fact

b) NON-DISCRIMINATORY/mutual recognition - cassis de dijon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fachverband der Buch-und

A

Austrian law = books imported cannot fix price lower than retail fixed price or publisher’s RRP at state of publication = MEQR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Com v France (Postal Franking Machines)

A

DISCRIMINATION IN FACT
- french authorities refused to approve British machines
- administrative discrimination = MEQR
(can be delay or refusing approval)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Com v Ireland (water supply pipes)

A

Irish council bid to tender incl. clause that said only use pipes complying with Irish standard (which only approved one company - Irish one)

INDISTINCLY APPLICABLE MEQR - restricted pipe supply to Irish manufacturer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cassis de Dijon

A

Obstacles of trade = MEQR

1) NO discrimination needs to be intended
2) rule of reason confirmed
3) HOME STATE CONTROL - mutual recognition

  • no dual burden
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Com v Germany (german bier)

A

Labelling law = MEQR

- mutual recognition, home state power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ministère Public v Deserbaus

A

French edam has to be 40%, germany tried to import 34.3% and call it edam

  • french cannot restrict
  • MEQR, mutual recognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rau

A

Belgium required margarine to be in cube packages

- MEQR, more difficult for importers to comply without incurring extra costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Exports?

A

Same rules
but only applies if there is discrimination, and seems like if it is DISTINCTLY applicable (discrimination as a matter of law)
- Criminal Proceedings against Marco Gill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cinematheque

A

yes SELLING ARRANGEMENTS are a MEQR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Torfean Borough Council v BBQ

A

Selling arrangements are MEQR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Sergus Oebel

A

Selling arrangements are not MEQR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Keck & Mithourard (confirmed in Tankstation)

A

SELLING ARRANGEMENTS ARE NOT MEQR

- no extra burden or cost

20
Q

Opening hours = selling arrangement

A

Punto Casa SpA v Sindaco del Commune de Capena

Tankstation tHeustke

21
Q

Familiapress

A

if its to do with composition of product, that is dual burden

not selling arrangement so MEQR

22
Q

Dynamic Median Vetriebs

A

if you need to adapt product it isn’t a selling arrangement

23
Q

Tommaso Mellato v Commendi Padova

A

Italian rule on how to package bake off bread was a selling arrangement = NOT MEQR

  • because packaged at point of sale, so not a product rule
24
Q

Alfa-Vita Vassilpoulous

A

national rule that bake off bread sellers have to have a fully equipped bakery even though its not necessary for baking bake-off bread

  • NOT SELLING ARRANGEMENT SO MEQR
  • governs production process of product
25
Q

QUALIFYING KECK

A

1) rules concerning sales characterised as a product rule (relating to product)
2) can still be a MEQR if it discriminates in law or in fact

26
Q

de agostini

A

selling arrangement is MEQR if it is discriminatory in law or fact

  • ban on TV adverts to children under 12 and for skincare products = MEQR
  • affects importers more
  • outright ban on promotion = greater impact on importer
27
Q

Gourmet International

A

swedish restriction on advertising alcohol except to traders
= MEQR
discrimination in fact because domestic consumers are more familiar with domestic products so affects trade

28
Q

Doc Moris NV

A

German prohibition on pharmaceuticals being made available on the internet
- MEQR
affects importers more (german sellers may have dispensaries)

29
Q

Herber Kamer

A

prohibition on advertising from insolvent estate
= NOT MEQR
not discriminatory, not broad ranging enough

30
Q

Com v Italy (motorcycle trailers)

A

measures restricting end uses of products can be discriminatory and thus a MEQR if it hinders access to market

3 categories:

1) product regulations - MEQR, Cassis
2) Selling arrangements - Keck
3) Residual category - incl. end use regulations

31
Q

Michelson v Roos

A

measures that restrict product use strongly = MEQR

test: hinders market substantially

32
Q

ART.34 = NO HDE … exceptions?

A

EMANATION OF THE STATE - ex. party association of pharmaceutical importers

APPLIES TO CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF PRIVATE BODIES - Fra.Bo

APPLYING TO STATE RE: INDIVIDUAL DOING MAIN ROLE - Spanish Strawberries, Schmidberger v Austria (MS has to take appropriate steps to ensure FMOG in territory even if obstacle created by private bodies)

33
Q

Kohl v Ringelhan, UHT milk

A

Art.3 6is interpreted narrowly

34
Q

Mandatory requirements

A
  • protection of working environment (oebel)
  • cultural expression (cinematheque)
  • plurality of press (familiapress)
  • protection of environment (recyclable bottles)
  • preventing risk of undermine social security (decker v casse)
  • fundamental rights (Schmidberger)
  • protecting children (dynamic median)
  • consumer protection (bier)
  • public health
35
Q

Tobacco Advertising I

A

TWO situations where art.114 can be used:
1) elimination of obstacles to exercise of fundamental freedoms

2) removal of appreciable distortions in competition
- both can be actual or future, and must be appreciable

36
Q

Swedish Match , Arnold Andre

A

total bans can be adopted under art.114

37
Q

Commission in World Farming

A

in minimum harmonisation measures

- UK cannot impose stricter standards re: export

38
Q

NV v United Foods & PUBA

A

Proportionality - “suitability”

measure to be suitable to achieve its objective

39
Q

Com v Denmark (recyclable bottles) - proportionality (2nd)

A

least trade restrictive = acceptable

for environmental protection, this measure is the least trade restrictive means of achieving objective in question

40
Q

Com v Germany (bier) - proportionality

A

not least trade restrictive

consumer protection can be done by labelling requirements

(controversial! it is the least trade restrictive for level of protection germany wanted)

41
Q

Fiete

A

labelling requirements may be a MEQR in itself

42
Q

Eugen Schmidberger

A

Motorway closure = fine (least trade restrictive)

couldn’t just ban it (that would breach FOS)

43
Q

Com v Denmark (recyclable bottles) - proportionality (3rd)

A

STRONG proportionality - cost benefit balancing

measure’s additional good has to be worth more than the additional bad

(the extra requirement that drinks sold must be in Danish state approved containers if sold over certain threshold not additional good outweighing additional bad)

44
Q

Heavy Lorries

A

procedural approach

45
Q

Com v Netherlands (Vitamins)

A

precautionary principle - if scientific uncertainty, MS enjoy discretion

  • only if evidence is more than mere conjecture

EU law (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions