Flash Cards UK Tort Pure Economic Loss

1
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Topic

A

Pure Economic Loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Principle

A

Economic loss due to negligence can be recoverable if caused by a physical event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Summary

A

Losses due to power cuts caused by the defendant’s negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Outcome

A

The court allowed a claim for economic loss caused by physical damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Topic

A

Pure Economic Loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Principle

A

No claim for pure economic loss unless there is physical damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Summary

A

Plaintiff sued for economic loss caused by defective construction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Outcome

A

The claim was dismissed as it did not involve physical damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Topic

A

Pure Economic Loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Principle

A

Liability for negligent misstatements can lead to economic loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Summary

A

Plaintiff relied on a negligent financial statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Outcome

A

The defendant was held liable for the economic loss caused by their negligent advice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Topic

A

Economic Loss Due to Misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Principle

A

Claims for economic loss due to misrepresentation are actionable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Summary

A

Plaintiff sued for economic loss caused by misrepresentation about business prospects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Outcome

A

The court found Esso liable for misrepresentation and economic loss.

17
Q

Case: The Aliakmon (1986) - Topic

A

Pure Economic Loss

18
Q

Case: The Aliakmon (1986) - Principle

A

No claim for pure economic loss arising from a negligent act unless there is physical damage.

19
Q

Case: The Aliakmon (1986) - Summary

A

Damage caused by negligence led to economic loss.

20
Q

Case: The Aliakmon (1986) - Outcome

A

No recovery for pure economic loss without physical damage.

21
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Principle

A

Economic loss due to negligent misstatement can be recovered if the defendant owed a duty of care.

22
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Summary

A

Plaintiff suffered economic loss after relying on a negligent reference given by the defendant.

23
Q

Case: Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964) - Outcome

A

The court held that a duty of care existed and allowed the claim for economic loss due to negligent misstatements.

24
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Principle

A

Economic loss due to negligence is recoverable only if it is connected to physical damage or property damage.

25
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Summary

A

Plaintiff’s factory suffered a loss of production due to power supply interruption.

26
Q

Case: Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co Ltd (1973) - Outcome

A

The court allowed the claim for economic loss linked to physical damage but not for the loss of profit.

27
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Principle

A

Economic loss due to defective building work is not recoverable in the absence of physical damage.

28
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Summary

A

The plaintiff sued the council for economic loss resulting from defective building foundations.

29
Q

Case: Murphy v Brentwood District Council (1991) - Outcome

A

The House of Lords ruled that the council was not liable for pure economic loss in this case.

30
Q

Case: White v Jones (1995) - Topic

A

Economic Loss Due to Negligent Advice

31
Q

Case: White v Jones (1995) - Principle

A

A negligent act causing economic loss can give rise to liability.

32
Q

Case: White v Jones (1995) - Summary

A

The plaintiff’s father’s solicitor failed to execute a will as instructed, resulting in loss.

33
Q

Case: White v Jones (1995) - Outcome

A

The court found that a duty of care existed between the solicitor and the intended beneficiary.

34
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Principle

A

Claims for economic loss due to negligent misrepresentation are actionable.

35
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Summary

A

The plaintiff relied on a misrepresentation made by Esso about the potential success of a petrol station.

36
Q

Case: Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon (1976) - Outcome

A

The court found Esso liable for the economic loss caused by its negligent misrepresentation.