Flaps general Flashcards
ALT flap:
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons
1) Type B/C
2) Dominant (Descending branch of lateral femoral circumflex)
3) VC and Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (anterior and posterior branches)
4) ASIS Superolateral patella Midpoint along line with 3cm radius (perforators, Skin paddle 10cm distal to ASIS and 7cm proximal to patella, Width of 9-10cm = primary closure)
5) Pros: Minimal donor site morbidity, sensate flap possible
Cons: Intramuscular dissection (85%)
DCIA flap:
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) Type 1
2) Dominant: Deep circumflex iliac
3) Single vein accompanies the artery and Sensory: T12
4) ASIS
Ellipse centered from ASIS along curvature of the iliac crest (Cutaneous perforators clustered in area measuring 4x6cm, above midpoint of the iliac crest, 5cm posterior to ASIS)
5) Pros: Large bone segment, bulk, ideal for hemimandible reconstruction
Cons: Can be too bulky for H+N recon, risk of hernias, damage to LFCN
Variants: Myocutaneous (Rubens flap), Perforator DCIA, Osteomyocutaneous
Deltopectoral flap:
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) Type C
2) Dominant: 1st, 2nd, 3rd IMA perforators
Source: Internal mammary artery
3) VCs and Sensory T2-T4 intercostals
4) Superior border: Infraclavicular line
Inferior: Parallel and superior to nipple
Lateral: Deltopectoral groove
Delay: Extend onto deltoid, lateral to deltopectoral groove
5) Pros: Easy dissection, reliable for H+N recon.
Cons: Morbidity and chest wall distortion.
Variants: IMAP, delay
VRAM/TRAM/DIEP flap:
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) Type 3
2) Dominants:
Superior epigastric (2-3cm, 1-2mm, internal mammary)
Inferior epigastric (6-10cm, 1-2.5mm, external iliac
Minor:
Segmental intercostal perforators (7th-12th)
3) Veins: Superiorly, one vein predominates
Inferiorly, veins combine to form a large single vein before entering external iliac
Nerve: 7th-12th intercostals
4) Midline
Costal margin
ASIS
Pubis
5) None written
DUA (Dorsal Ulnar Artery) Flap:
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) Typa A
2) Dominant:
Ulnar artery (dorsal branch)
Source: Ulnar artery
3) Veins: 2 VCs
Diameter 0.8-1mm
1 vein connects to superficial system
Nerve: Sensory Dorsal ulnar branch
4) Ulnar artery axis: Medial epicondyle to pisiform
DUA perforator 2-4cm proximal to pisiform
Boundaries:
- Anterior : PL
- Posterior: EDC D4
Artery located within septum between FCU and ECU.
5) Pros: Does not sacrifice main artery,
Cons: Retrograde venous drainage, used for small deficits
Facial Artery Myomucosal (FAMM) flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) No type
2) Dominant:
Facial artery, angular branch
Source: External carotid artery
3) Venous plexus, but no VCs with the facial artery
4) Doppler identification of the facial artery/angular branch
Artery lies between buccinator muscle and overlying muscles of facial expression
Flap consists of mucosa, submucosa, buccinator muscle 5-8mm thick
Based superiorly (retrograde blood flow typically used for for palatal fistula recon), or inferiorly (more robust blood supply)
**If inferiorly based for palatal reconstruction, bite block required post-op until flap division 2-3 weeks later
5) Pros: Reliable anatomy, local tissues, robust, minimal morbidity if flap kept narrow
Cons: Small size, risk of cheek contracture if very wide flap harvested
Variants: Superior or inferior based design
FDMA/Quaba/DMA flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) Type A
2) Dominant:
Dorsal metacarpal artery
Source: Dorsal carpal arch
3) Veins: VCs
Nerve: Radial or ulnar dorsal sensory
4) The FDMA (kite) flap design runs from the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the index finger proximally to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the index finger distally, the radial and ulnar borders being the midlateral lines on either side of the digits.
The DMA/Quaba flaps have similar elliptical skin designs, with the longitudinal axis centered on the intermetacarpal space, spanning the level of the metacarpal heads to the distal wrist. The ulnar and radial borders of the skin paddle are determined by a pinch test and by the ability to close the donor site primarily
A handheld pencil Doppler probe can be used to identify the dorsal metacarpal artery, as well as the cutaneous perforator emanating from the DMA in between the metacarpal heads, which corresponds to the pivot point for both the DMA and Quaba flaps. The pivotal point of the flap is approximately 1.5 cm proximal to the leading edge of the web space.
5) Pros: Reliable anatomy, versatile, local option, thin tissue, sensate PRN
Cons: At risk for venous congestion, less reliable for ulnar sided defects
Variants: Composite flap (with tendon graft), sensate
Fibula flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant?
1) Type B/C
2) Dominant:
Peroneal artery perforators
Source: Peroneal artery/tibioperoneal trunk
3) Vein: VCs
Nerve: Sensory Superficial peroneal nerve
4) Peroneal head
Lateral malleolus remain ~6cm proximal to avoid destabilizing mortise
Axis = posterior crural septum between lateral and superficial posterior compartments
Skin paddle centered over septum in middle/distal third where majority of perforators located
5) Pros: Large segment of vascularized cortical bone, versatile, multiple osteotomies as needed (periosteal + endosteal blood supply)
Cons: Contraindicated in Peronea Magna (~1%), Risk of nerve damage
Variants: Osseous, Osteofasciocutaneous, Osteomusculocutaneous, Epiphyseal (based off of Anterior Tibial artery).
GASTROCNEMIUS flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type 1
2) Dominant:
Medial or Lateral sural arteries
Source: Popliteal artery
3) Vein: VCs
Nerve: Branches of the tibial nerve
4) 1) Midline stocking seam incision
2) 2cm posterior to fibula/tibia (overlying muscle belly)
Origin: Femoral condyles
Insertion: Calcaneus (Achilles tendon)
5) Pros: Medial head is larger, less risk of damage to peroneal nerve
Cons: Contraindicated if DVT
Variants: Musculocutaneous, functional muscle transfer
GLUTEUS flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type 3
2) Dominant:
Superior Gluteal
Inferior Gluteal
Minor:
1st perforator of profunda femoris
3) Vein: Superior and inferior gluteal veins
Nerve: Inferior gluteal nerve (L5-S2)
4) Origin:
- PSIS
- Coccyx
- Lateral sacrum
- Ischial tuberosity
Insertion:
- Greater trochanter
- IT tract
5) Pros: 50% of muscle can be used without deficit, can be re-advanced
Cons: Donor site
Variants: Semi-circular, functional muscle transfer, SGAP, IGAP, free flap
Gracilis flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type 2
2) Dominant:
Medial circumflex femoral
Source: Femoris profunda
Minors: Branches of deep femoral or superficial femoral (in the distal half of the muscle)
3) Vein: VCs
*Can include greater saphenous vein as secondary outflow
Nerve: Sensory: Anterior femoral cutaneous / Motor: Obturator
4) Pubic tubercle to medial femoral condyle adductor longus tendon
Gracilis lies 2cm posterior
- Skin paddle taken from proximal 2/3 as distal 1/3 is unreliable
5) Pros: Reliable pedicle, good arc of rotation, distal tendon available
Cons: Risk of lymphedema, limited/unreliable skin paddle, weak muscle, difficult in obese patients
Variants: Myocutaneous, TUG/TMG flap, Functional muscle transfer
Groin Flap/SCIA/SCIP
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) type A
2) Dominant:
Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery (SCIA)
Source: Superficial femoral artery
3) Vein: Single vein draining to the saphenous, Superficial to the SCIA
Nerve: Sensory T12: lateral cutaneous nerve
4) Femoral vessels
Pubic symphysis
ASIS
Inguinal ligament
Skin paddle centered over 1/3 super to ligament +
2/3 inferior to ligament
Vascular pedicle lies 3cm below and parallel to inguinal ligament
Random blood supply distal to ASIS
5) Pros: Good salvage option when micro not possible, hidden donor site, thin in low BMI patients
Cons: Short pedicle if free flap, thick for high BMI patients
Variants: SCIP perforator flap, Delay if needing to extend far beyond ASIS (q2weeks for delay)
IGAP flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type C
2) Dominant:
Perforator of inferior gluteal artery
3) Vein: VC
Nerve: Clunial nerves (superior, medial, inferior)
4) PSIS
Ischial tuberosity
Inferior gluteal crease
- Pedicle 2/3 distance from PSIS to ischion
- Paddle oriented along inferior gluteal crease
- Inferior incision 2-3cm caudal to inferior gluteal crease
5) Pros: Longer pedicle than SGAP, hidden scar in inferior gluteal crease
Cons: Increased risk of dehiscence, nerve injury, difficult
Lateral Arm flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type B
2) Dominant:
Posterior branch of radial collateral (PRCA)
Source: Profunda brachii
3) Vein: Deep VCs
Superficial to Cephalic
Nerve: Sensory Lower lateral cutaneous nerve
Branch of radial nerve
Perforates lateral head of triceps near deltoid
4) Deltoid insertion
Lateral epicondyle
Lateral intermuscular septum
**Anterior branch of radial collateral artery runs with radial nerve
5) Pros: Thin flap, reliable anatomy, easy dissection, sensate
Cons: Smaller width, short pedicle
Variants: Extended lateral arm, reverse (anastomoses of radial collateral artery with radial recurrent artery), fascial, osteocutaneous, vascularized nerve graft
LATISSIMUS DORSI flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type 5
2) Dominant: Thoracodorsal
Minor: Para-spinal and lumbar perforators
Source: Subscapular
3) Vein: VC
Nerve: Thoracodorsal (C6-8)
4) Midline
Posterior iliac crest
Anterior border of the muscle (posterior mid-axillary)
Scapular tip
Skin paddle must be 8cm superior to iliac crest
Superior muscle fibers located below scapula
5) Pros: Robust, large surface, reliable
Cons: Seroma, loss of function paralysis
Variants: Chimeric (LD+serratus), TDAP, Reverse, Fonctional, Hemi-LD
Masseter flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type 1
2) Dominant: Masseteric artery
Source: IMAX
3) Vein: Massteric vein
Nerve: Masseteric nerve (V3)
1-4 branches: multiple in 75% of patients
4) Zygomatic arch
Mandibular body
Mandibular notch
**Stensen’s duct runs superficial to the masseter, and deep to facial musculature
5) Pros: Local option, +/- expendable muscle of mastication, nerve used for facial reanimation
Cons: Minimal excursion, sacrificing functional muscle
Variants: Inferiorly based
MEDIAL PLANTAR flap
1) Type ?
2) Pedicule?
3) Vein and Nerve?
4) Markings?
5) Pro and cons and variant
1) Type B
2) Dominant: Medial plantar artery
Minor: Myocutaneous perforating vessels from the abductor hallucis brevis and flexor digitorum brevis
Source: Posterior tibial artery
3) Vein: VC
Nerve: Medial plantar nerve (L4-5)
4) Non-weight-bearing instep skin
Head of first metatarsal (distal)
Cubicle of the navicular bone (proximal)
5) Pros: Good padding, minimal donor site morbidity
Cons: Primary closure impossible, must skin graft
Variants: reverse V-Y advancement (1-2cm), myofasciocutaneous (abductor hallucis)