Fla. Civ. Review 3 Flashcards
Interrogatories
-Only on parties
-Only 30 W/O leave of court
-Responding party must object or answer fully and under oath within 30 days after Service
-45 Days to respond if served with Summons and Complaint
-Answers to Interrogatories CAN be admissible as substantive evidence
-May be able to examine business records
Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes
-each item described with reasonable particularity
-Not obligated to produce docs. within 30 days, just respond
-Scope: reasonably caluculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence
-Just produce what’s in possession, don’t have to create shit
Objections made to document requests should be:
-specific, boilerplate objections that are overly broad are insufficient
-Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse responding party from producing documents where no objection
Production of Docs adn Things WITHOUT Depo
The notice of production from Non-Party: notice of intent to issue subpoena for production from non-parties must be served a MINIMUM of 10 days prior to the issuance of subpoena
-Notice is sent to all parties of record
-ACTUAL SUBPOENA MUST MATCH PROPOSED SUBPOENA ON NOTICE -Party seeking the documents from the non parties is prohibited from sending the notice or proposed subpoenas to the non-parties
-HAVE TO WAIT 10 DAYS IN ORDER TO SEND TO NON-PARTIES (But if there is an objection than have to wait until the objection is ruled on)
Objection by Non-party for Documents
-If there are No Objections, either counsel or the Clerk can issue subpoenas for service on the non-parties to produce the documents
-If the Non-party does not object, the Documents are usually produced by Mail
-If the Non-Party DOES Object, the non-party objections cannot be resolved by the court
-If the Non-Party DOES Object the only recourse is to take a records custodian deposition
Examination of person
-Team Plaintiff IS generally permitted to attend
-Team Defense is NEVER permitted to attend
-Party being examined has the right to document the CME by stenographic recording, audio or video; Video or audio tape of CME should be considered work product as long as the recording is not being used for impeachment or use at trial
Request for admissions
-Carry the same 30 day response time as other discovery methods, extended to 45 days where the requests are served with the initial pleading, unless served with summons and complaint than 45 Days
Three Responses to request
o 1) an objection to the request;
o 2) a written response to the request (whether an admission, denial, qualified admission or denial, or statement of the responding party’s inability to admit or deny); or
o 3) no response at all (same as admission)
Four Written Responses to Requests
1) An admission,
2) Denial
3) A qualified admission or denial, or
4) A statement that the responding party is unable to admit or deny (Treated as a denial)
A party seeking either (a) to withdraw an admission for failure to respond, or (b) to amend a prior response, must seek such relief by motion
Trial courts have the discretion to allow a party to overcome technical admissions where the party can demonstrate that the failure to timely respond was a result of excusable neglect
Motion for Order Compelling Discovery
to be used when a party has failed to:
-answer a question at deposition;
-failed to answer an interrogatory,
-failed to produce in response to an RTP
-failed to appear for a rule 1.360 examination
The losing party shall be required to pay “reasonable expenses incurred” including attorney’s fees, in obtaining an order compelling discovery or successfully opposing the motion
Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Order Compelling Discovery
-If the trial court dismisses an action or enters a default as a sanction for discovery violations, a finding that the violations were willful or deliberate must be made
-The striking or a party’s pleadings is justified only where there is a “deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court’s authority”
Voluntary Dismissal
Under Rule 1.420, a plaintiff is permitted to dismiss all or part of an action before trial, but the motion must be made in writing.
DURING TRIAL A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL IS EFFECTIVE IF RECITED ORALLY AND ON THE RECORD
A party may have one free voluntary dismissal. (W/O Prejudice)
Second voluntary dismissal is with prejudice
In the event of dismissal under 1.420 the Defendant is entitled to an award of costs, Defendant MUST seek the award of costs in the dismissed action with 30 DAYS OF DISMISSAL
Involuntary Dismissals
-Provides a “directed verdict” like a motion in a non-jury case
-Motion for dismissal MUST be denied if the claimant has submitted a prima facie case
-Dismissal under 1.420(b) CANNOT be entered against a party before it has completed its presentation of evidence
Involuntary Dismissal for Failure to Obey a Court Order-PE
Under Rule 1.420, Court may dismiss a case for failing to obey a court order. The factors the court will consider when determing whether to dismiss the case include the following:
1) Whether the attorney’s disobedience was willful, deliberate, or contumacious or rather the act was due to neglence or inexperience,
2) Whether the attorney had been previously sanctioned
3) Whether the client was personally involved in the act of disobedience
4) Whether any delay prejudiced the opposing party through undue expense, loss of evidence, or in some other manner,
5) Whether the attorney offered reasonable justification for noncompliance, and
6) Whether any delay created significant problems of judicial administration.
Failure to Prosecute
-Dismissal can occur only after a party or the court moves for dismissal upon notice and hearing
-PLAINTIFF HAS 60 DAYS AFTER THE NOTICE TO TAKE ACTION OF RECORD AND THEREBY AVOID DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
-ANY FILING of record during the 60-day period is sufficient to preclude dismissal
Dismissal for Fraud on the Court-PE
Inherent authority of the court
Fraud must be shown by clear and convincing evidence
show the party knowingly set in motion unconscionable scheme to interfere with judicial ability to impartially adjudicate the matter
By influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering opposing parties claims or defenses
Permeate whole proceeding
In order to set aside a default, Def must show: PE
- Due Diligence; (Supported by affidavit or competent evidence at hearing)
- Excusable Neglect; and (Supported by affidavit or competent evidence at hearing)
- A Meritorious Defense (This type of defense is recognized by the court as having potential merit, meaning it could, if proven, effectively counteract or negate the plaintiff’s claims)
Both due diligence and excusable neglect must be verified or supported by affidavit or competent evidence at a hearing
The existence of a meritorious defense should be disclosed by tendering a defensive pleading showing the defense, or by a verified motion or sworn affidavit either (a) stating facts which, if proved, would constitute a meritorious defense or (b) showing legal grounds constituting a meritorious defense
Jury Trials
The right to a trial by jury is preserved by the Florida Constitution
THIS IS A RIGHT THAT CAN BE WAIVED (If waived, may NOT be granted without consent of all parties)
-You must Request a trial. By jury in the answer
Failure to request a trial by jury in the complaint or answer is NOT fatal
A party may request a trial by jury NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE LAST PLEADING DIRECTED TO THE ISSUE
-If trial by jury is waived, a jury trial may NOT be granted without consent of all parties
-Demand for trial by jury may NOT be withdrawn without the consent of the parties
Setting Action for Trial
For Streamlined cases and General Cases the court must enter an order setting the trial period NO LATER THAN 45 DAYS before the projected trial term outlined in the case management order
-For cases not subject to rule 1.200 or 1.201 the court MUST enter an order setting the trial only upon finding that the action is ready for trial
An order scheduling a trial term must schedule the trial to begin NO SOONER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE ORDER
-Motion MUST state whether the trial is on the original action
-Motion MUST state whether the trial is on the original action
-Motion MUST state whether it is a jury or non-jury trial
-Motion MUST state the amount of time requested for the trial
-Motion MUST state whether courts has authorized the participation of prospective jurors or empaneled jurors through audio-video communication technology under rule 1.430(d)
-Make sure you estimate the time required for the ENTIRE trial, not just your portion
Qualificiations of Jurors
1) At least 18 years old
2) Citizens of the United States and legal residents of Florida and their respective counties
3) MUST possess a driver license or identification card issued by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
4) Or who has executed the affidavit prescribed in § 40.011
Unless civil rights restored, not eligible if under prosecution for or convicted of a felony or certain other crimes
-Citizens 70 years of age and up not eligible unless they request to serve on juries
CIVIL TRIAL MUST HAVE SIX (6) MEMBERS
Voir Dire
-Voir Dire is a Right
Challenges for cause: the test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render a verdict solely upon the evidence presented and instructions on the law given by the court
Preserving your Cause Objections-PE
You MUST do the following to preserve your cause objections for appellate review:
1) Make your challenge for cause
2) Trial court refuses to strike the juror
3) You use a peremptory challenge to strike the juror
4) After exhausting all remaining peremptory challenges, you request an additional peremptory challenge to strike a specifically named juror
5) Your request for an additional peremptory challenge is refused
6) Before the actual swearing of the jury, you must again renew your objection so that the trial court will have one last clear opportunity to take the appropriate corrective action
7) in addition, you must be able to demonstrate to the appellate court that the objectionable juror actually was seated on the jury, and not merely as an alternate