Fla. Civ. Review 2 Flashcards
Attaching Copy and Exhibits to Pleadings
Any exhibit attached to a Pleading MUST be considered a part of the Pleading
COMPLAINT BASED ON A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT DOES NOT STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION UNTIL THE INSTRUMENT OR AN ADEQUATE PORTION THEREOF ATTACHED TO COMPLAINT
Time to Answer varying on who Def is
Civilian Defendant=20 DAYS TO RESPOND*
Gov’t Defendant=40 DAYS TO RESPOND IF NOT A TORT
Gov’t Defendant=30 DAYS TO RESPOND IF A TORT*
If court denies motion directed toward complaint how long to respond with Answer?
10 days (or when Court says it’s due)
The Filing of a Motion Based on the 7
Grounds Listed in 1.140 (b) Tolls the Time
for Serving an Answer..what are the 7?
1) Lack of SMJ
2) Lack of PJ
3) Improper venue
4) Insufficiency of process
5) Insufficiency of service of process
6) Failure to state a cause of action
7) Failure to join indispensable parties
What is waived if not raised in preanswer or answer?
Venue and PJ
Defense of lack of SMJ can be raised when?
Anytime
Motion to dismiss for Failure to Stae a Cause of Action
Court limits its Analysis to the “Four Corners” of the Complaint
All Allegations of the complaint must be taken as true
Any motions to dismiss that are granted are invariably granted with “Leave to Amend”
Preferred method to deal with Insufficiency of Process and Insufficiency of Service is…
Motion to Quash
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
- -Motion made after the pleadings are closed
- -Pleadings are closed until the last pleading directed toward the Complaint Has Been Filed
-In other words, the motion cannot be filed until there has been an answer and, Reply or the Time for Filing a Reply has elapsed - All factual allegations are taken as true in favor of Non-Moving Party
- Judge Cannot Consider Depositions, Answers to Interrogatories, or Affidavits
- Motion should only be granted when the court concludes that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
How Judgment on the Pleadings is different from Motion to Dimiss and Summary Judgment?
- DIFFERS FROM A MOTION TO DISMISS IN THAT THE COURT CAN CONSIDER AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN THE DEF’S ANSWER
- DIFFERS FROM MOTION TO DISMISS IN THAT THE OUTCOME IS NOT DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
- DIFFERS FROM SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THAT NO EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IS CONSIDERED
Sham Pleadings PE
There are two main requirements for a pleading to be a sham, the pleading must be palpably and inherently false, and the falsity must be known to the party interposing it to be true. A Defendant can move to strike a pleading that is alleged a “sham”. The motion must contain the following:
1) be verified,
2) set forth facts showing why the pleading is sham, and
3) be supported by an affidavit or deposition testimony.
After the motion is filed, the court must hold an evidentiary hearing and there must be notice given on the evidentiary hearing. The motion must also be heard before the trial.
Compulsory Counterclaims
if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject of the main claim
Use the “Logical Relationship Test”: same aggregate of facts serves as the basis for both claims
-If the Former Cross-Claim is later brought as an independent action, then the opposing party cannot claim that it should have been brought as a counterclaim
-Compulsory counterclaim MUST be raised in Original Answer or in Amended Answer after Leave of Court
-Statute of Limitations DOES NOT BAR A COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM
Permissive Counterclaim
one that does not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence
o SOL WILL BAR A PERMISSIVE COUNTERCLAIM
o Must have a sufficient jurisdictional basis
-Counterclaim may be asserted for damages in excess of the amount claimed in the initial claim or action
Crossclaim
A claim by ONE defendant against ANOTHER defendant
o Crossclaim is NOT compulsory
o Always permissive
-Examples: Indemnity
When can you bring a third party claim without leave of court?
within 20 days of Service of Answer, otherwise need leave of court
Third Party Claim is NOT compulsory
Claims agasint the 3rd party are NOT waived if they are not asserted in the third-party claim
When can you amend a pleading?
Once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed on the trial calendar, may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served
You can amend with leave of court after motion or written consent of adverse party
Amendments to Conform with the Evidence
-This happens at trial via an Ore Tenus Motion (oral)
-Can occur through express or implied consent of the opposing party
-Implied consent may be found in the pretrial statement, opening statement
of counsel or presentation of evidence
-Main issue is whether there is prejudice to the opposing party; Prejudice may be in the form of failure to do Discovery on the issue or failure to be prepared to present evidence on the issue
Objection of Relevance/Materiality should be made at trial for evidence presented on an issue not plead
If seeking approval by court for an amended pleading, do you need to attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading to your motion to amend?
Yep
Relation Back
Set forth transactions, events which have happened since the date of the original pleading
Must arise out of same occurrence or does not relate back
Supp. Pleadings Do NOT relate back, they set forth transactions which have happened since the date of original pleading
Punitive Damages
A motion for leave to amend a pleading to assert to claim for punitive damages shall make
a reasonable showing, by evidence in the record or evidence to be proffered by the claimant, that provides a reasonable basis for recovery of such damages-SUPPORTED in form of affidavit, deposition
Parties
1) “Real Party” party who has actually beeb injured, OR as a
2) Nominal Representative Party (stands in shoes of injured party)
Although a claim for personal injury of a minor child must be brought by the parent or guardian of the minor, the MINOR is the real party in interest
Interventions -FACTORS
An interest in the matter of the Litigation, Such that the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment
1) size of the interest,
2) potential for conflict or new interests, and
3) source of the interest.
Misjoinder and Nonjoinder of Parties
Misjoined claims may be severed and proceeded with separately
Consolidation-FACTORS
When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions
1) Whether the litigation will be accelerated due to the consolidation
2) Unnecessary costs and delays
3) The possibility of inconsistent verdicts
4) Whether consolidation would eliminate duplicative trials that involve substantially the same core of operative facts and question of law
5) Whether consolidation would deprive a party of a substantive right
Motion must be made before trial