FL Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Negligence: Duty

A

Duty: only owe a duty to foreseeable Plaintiffs.

If it is foreseeable, must act like RPP.

  1. Invited licensee FL: landowner has duty to warn, clean up, make safe.
    1. Business: duty of businesses to use reasonable efforts to keep the premises free of transitory foreign objects that could foreseeably lead to an injury. (banana peel in grocery store)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Breach

A

Failure to comply with the duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Causation: Actual v. Proximate Cause

A

Actual cause: defined by but for test. But for D’s actions, no injury would have occurred

Proximate cause: foreseeability test. What occurred would foreseeably lead to an injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Damages

A

actual, physical harm must occur. entitled to compensatory damages (lost wages, medical bills, pain and suffering, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intervening/superseding causes:

A

these causes occur after alleged negligence. applies in the other subsequent events that happen to P.

Intervening: any foreseeable subsequent injuries or accidents that occur to P after the acts of negligence. Original D will pay all of the damages.

Superseding: If something occurs that is considered unforseeable, the superseding cause will cut off liability.

superseding causes include: 1) acts of God, 2) intentional torts or crimes, 3) anything the facts say is foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pure Comparative Negligence: Defenses

ALWAYS put this in an essay

A

If P commits negligence themselves, their damages will be reduced by their percentage of fault and will recover the remaining damages.

If P is found to be legally drunk and is responsible for more than 50% of the accident then you recover nothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assumption of the risk (Defense to negligence)

A
  1. Know and appreciate the nature of the conduct/action and do it anyway. Cannot sue now bc you knew the risk.
    1. Does not come up at lot.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negligence per se

A

An individual violated an ordinance or statute,

the injured party was part of the protected class of people that statute was intended to protect,

and the injury was what the statute was trying to prevent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Florida Good Samaritan

A

No duty to rescue or come to someone’s aid. If you do render aid, owe them reasonable care.

A medical professional in FL rendering aid is not liable unless they were reckless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Vicarious Liability (rarely will there be a negligence essay where this is not brought up!)

A

Employer is liable for the negligent acts of their employees as long as the employee was acting in the scope of their employment.

FL Rule: Negligent hiring: Employer cannot be presumed negligent in hiring an employee if the employer did a background check on employee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY (ALWAYS PUT)

A

Joint and several liability has been abolished in FL.

Each Defendant must be sued for their percentage of fault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sovereign Immunity

A

The government is generally immune from the negligent acts of their employees.

Operational v Discretionary

Operational- while the employee is doing their job, if they commit negligence, they can be sued.

Discretionary/planning: employer is immune.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Medical Malpractice

A

Duty to act like other similarly trained professionals in that same community.

Do a negligence analysis here.

90 days to file suit.

If patient was unconscious at the time of the injury, medical malpractice is presumed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Punitive damages: rarely awarded.

A

Punitive damages are rarely awarded.

Punitive damages will be awarded when there is clear and convincing evidence that someone acted wilful, wanton, intentionally, or with gross negligence.

3x compensatory damages or $500K, whichever is greater.

there is no cap if it is intentional rather than gross negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Collateral source rule

A

In FL, your damages will be reduced by any other recovery from other sources (insurance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

IIED/NIED

A

argue this in defamation circumstance, intentional tort circumstance, or gross negligence circumstance

negligent infliction of emotional distress: negligent conduct, someone was in the zone of danger, and someone suffered severe emotional distress and some sort of physical injury.

intentional infliction of emotional distress:

intent or reckless conduct, severe and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional distress. No physical injury needs to occur

17
Q

Modified no fault

A

If an injured person has their own insurance, their insurance (plaintiff’s insurance) will pay the first 10K of the damages (PIP)

18
Q

Dangerous instrumentality in FL

A

If someone lends you their car and they crash it, the owner is liable for the damages. Not the person who crashed it

19
Q

Wrongful death statute

A

If an individual’s negligence caused a death, the personal representative of the decedent’s estate may be able to bring a suit on negligence on behalf of the deceased, for loss of companionship, etc

20
Q

survivor action

A

if one of the parties dies, the lawsuit survives. the PR of the estate will be able to continue the suit

21
Q

Products Liability: Negligence

A

Negligence: did someone act negligent and that is why the product is defective?

negligence analysis?

22
Q

Breach of warranty: Implied warranty of merchantability

A

a product is of quality equal to a generally acceptable standard and fit for ordinary purpose

23
Q

Implied warranty for fitness of particular purpose

A

A seller knew or should have known of a particular purpose for which the goods are sold and they buyer is relying on the seller’s skill or judgment to furnish those goods

24
Q

Strict Product Liability

A
  1. The product left the manufacturer in a defective condition. The condition was either a design or manufacturing defect.
  2. Sold by a commercial seller
  3. A foreseeable user used it
  4. Used for its intended purpose
  5. It was unchanged from its original condition
25
Q

Inadequate or failure to warn

A

Another cause of action arguing that the warning was inadequate or there should been a warning and there wasn’t.

26
Q

Legal Defense to strict products liability

A
  1. assumption of the risk
  2. pure comparative negligence
  3. misrepresentation (intentional or negligent)
27
Q

Intentional misrepresentation

A

Intentionally said or wrote something to induce reliance of a material fact

28
Q

Negligent misrepresentation

A

Comes up in a professional or business situation.

Forgetting to say something, etc.

Someone relied on what you did or didn’t say.

29
Q

Defamation: define what is defamatory

A

A statement is defamatory if:

1) it is a false statement of fact (not opinion)
2) about the Plaintiff
3) the statement hurts their reputation
4) with publication (third party heard and understood what was said)
5) Defendant is at fault
6) causes P damages

30
Q

Defamation: harm and publication

A

does not have to cause economic harm necessarily.

Publication= third party heard and understood what was said.

31
Q

Private person: negligence

A

Need to prove negligence. Standard is that D acted negligently.

32
Q

Public figure

A

Actual malice or reckless disregard of the truth. D knew or should have known what the truth was and wrote it anyway

33
Q

What kind of defamatory statement? Slander

A

Slander: spoken statement. if it is spoken, need to prove special damages (pecuniary damages). that was D said hurt your job/income.

34
Q

what kind of defamatory statement? slander per se

A

Slander per se: worse than regular slander. the statement is so bad that the damages are presumed.

statements made about profession, trade, chastity of a woman, loathsome disease, or accusing of a felony

35
Q

what kind of defamatory statement? libel

A

a statement in permanent form

36
Q

Defenses to Defamation

A
  • if statement is true
  • Qualified privilege

qualified privilege: statement made in good faith by someone interested in the subject matter and made in a proper manner.

person with qualified privilege thought they were telling the truth and were wrong.

37
Q

Defamation: IIED or NIED

A

always argue IIED in defamation essay